Essay Instructions: Rhetorical Analysis Assignment
1. Critique children's literature for audience, tone, purpose, ethical, logical, and emotional appeals.
2. Analyze visual arguments.
3. Inorporate summary, quotation, and paraphrase effectively into writing.
Use the children's book : " Le Petit Prince" by Saint-Exupery
and based on The Pleasures of Children's Literature analyze the selected book to determine the author's purpos, how the text supports that purpose and link the rhetorical analysis to the broad study of Children's literature.
The purpose of the assignment is not to summarize the book , but to critique it using rhetorical analysis skills.
1. Who is the intended audience for the aricle?
2. What is the books main argument/message/purpose?
3. Does it appear that the author is approaching this book from a certain ideological standpoint?
4. What type of rhetorical tools ( logos, pathos, and ethos) does the book employ?
5. How does the book support its argument or main points?
6. Does the book have any images, such as graphs, or photographs, ? WHY DO YOU THINK THESE IMAGES ARE IMPORTANT? Are they effective?
THE PAPER SHOULD AT LEAST INCORPORATE ONE OR TWO QUOTATIONS TO SUPPORT THE MAIN ARGUMENT. ALL QUOTATIONS MUST HAVE IN-TEXT CITATIONS . YOU MUST USE MLA FORMATTING AND DOCUMENTATION. YOU MUST ATTACH A WORKS CITED (MLA) PAGE ON A SEPARATE SHEET WITH THE ESSAY. YOU MUST LINK AT LEAST ONE EXCERPT FROM THE PLEASEURE OF CHILDREN'S LITERATURE TO THE RHETORICAL ANALYSIS.
THE LINK TO THE PLEASURE OF CHILDREN'S LITERATURE WILL BE SENT IN AN E-MAIL BUT WHERE TO ?
There are faxes for this order.
Excerpt From Essay:
Essay Instructions: Rhetorical Analysis Paper
Your purpose this time is to investigate how the core reading is put together?paying attention to linguistic and rhetorical elements such as language, style, structure, imagery, evidence, authorial credibility, intended audience, etc.?in order to analyze how the author moves his or her readers to feel certain ways, agree or disagree with certain conclusions, understand the meaning or purpose of the writing, or decide on a particular course of action. What is the author trying to do in this writing, how does he or she go about it, and how well does he or she succeed?
To prepare, you will need to study rhetorical analysis carefully, and then critically understand the core reading with these new questions in mind.
As part of your rhetorical analysis, you will also be asked to find and use one outside source. Consider finding and using one of the following types of outside sources: an article about the author of the core reading; an article about the core reading itself; another writing by the same author that uses similar or different rhetorical strategies; an article about the same subject as the core reading, that may use different or similar rhetorical techniques to deal with the subject. This additional outside source does not need to be the major focus of your discussion. Instead, use it to shed light on or supplement one or more of your points about the author and his/her intentions or rhetorical strategies.
You?ll need to consider the nature of your own readers carefully. Keep in mind that your readers are not the same as the readers intended by the author of the core reading. Put some thought into the audience analysis activity before undertaking your first draft.
? 1200 words minimum, double-spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font
? Clearly developed main point (thesis) analyzing author?s intentions or rhetorical strategies
? Well-reasoned analysis of core reading?s rhetorical strategies, supported with evidence
? Audience awareness
? Observation of the conventions of Standard English
? Use of at least ten documented quotes (words, phrases, or key sentences) and/or documented paraphrases (key details or ideas rephrased in your own words), documented with correct in-text documentation in MLA style These quotes/paraphrases should come from both the core reading and the outside database source, in whatever mix is relevant to your analysis.
? MLA manuscript style with in-text documentation and Works Cited or References list citing your two required sources (this page does not count in the minimum word count requirement). If you make use of additional sources beyond the two required sources, you must include each in the Works Cited or References list as well.
? First draft must include a minimum 200-word audience analysis. This analysis should appear as the first item in your first draft, before page 1 of the actual paper. Audience analysis is to be removed from the final draft.
What claims about that core reading strike your classmates as believable? What seems unlikely to them? What needs more information before your readers can make something of it? Are there other writings that this reminds you of?
What can you find out about the author of the core reading? What else has this author written, and how does it compare to this work? Are there events, places, situations and experiences that might give insight into this author?s intentions, motivations, interests, or purposes here? What ?rings true? with what you might know about the topic/theme, and what seems contrived or not quite right?
2. SHAPE your writing.
Choose an organizational pattern. Possible patterns include using spatial or chronological order, comparison/contrast, definition and classification, or causal analysis. You might also consider organizing by listing the strategies you plan to talk about in order of importance, order of appearance, least-to-most effective, or most-to-least effective order.
Create a thesis statement. This should be your major claim about the rhetorical methods used by the author of the core reading. The thesis should be an analytical thesis that makes a claim about how, why, or how effectively the author communicates his/her purposes and intentions.
Create a working outline of the points you want to make, and review this list before you start your rough draft. This list should follow your organizational pattern. You may find yourself returning to this list to revise it as you write. Edit any new ideas into your working outline so they don?t get lost or end up in confusing places in your writing. In the list identify the lines and passages that you want to quote, paraphrase, and discuss. As you select which passages to work with, think once again about YOUR purpose and audience. What terms might they need to have explained? Which ideas or events might they be familiar with, and which ones may need to be discussed further to make sense to this kind of audience?
3. DRAFT your writing using the list you created as a rough outline. Be sure you?ve noted passages from the core reading that support each point you are making.
Use MLA style in-text documentation.
Use topic sentences and transitions between paragraphs. Be sure body paragraphs have topic sentences that relate to the list of supporting claims in your working outline/list or the main claim/thesis in your introduction. Solid development may require more than one paragraph to discuss any one particular point from your list. When that happens, effective paragraph transition can give your readers a clear indication that you are still on the same general point or that you are moving on to a new point.
Excerpt From Essay:
Essay Instructions: Rhetorical analysis
1. Obama's speech(A more perfect union http://www.truthout.org/article/barack-obama-a-more-perfect-union )
2. Expalain briefly what kind of text it is, when and where it was first published or spoken, and its main argument
3. Make a claim about the text, which you support with close analysis
4. Analze the context. what other texts or events does it response to? who is the author? what motivated the author to write this text? what can you infer about the intended audience?
5. Analyze the appeals. what appeals to values and emotions are used? waht appeals to logic are used? Do you find any logical fallacies(begging the question, Either-or, false analogies, non sequitur, oversimplification, post hoc fallacy, rationlization,slippery slope)?
6.Analyze the organization and style. What are the major parts and how are they arranged? is the style formal, informal, satircal, or something else? are any metaphors used?
p.s---please wite as a plain essay! I am a international student
Excerpt From Essay:
Essay Instructions: HE INSTRUCTION THAT YOU HAVE TO USE:
The paper is all about Rhetorical Analysis of the article "Stick and Stones and Sports Team Names" by Richard Estrada.
You need to find the article online, not the recap of what others say about his article.
It has to be 6 paragraphs of essay. IT HAS TO BE 2.5 PAGES to 3 PAGES (NO MORE THAN 3 PAGES) with one inch space all around (MLA style)
-For introduction: start with general statement about the topic, and then lead to the thesis. The thesis MUST state the assessment of Richard Estrada argument. State author and name of his article. Give one-sentence summary of what he says. Then lead to the thesis. Need to have a good thesis to begin the papers.
-Body: perform rhetorical analysis on his argument:
The body MUST include:
one paragraph of PATHOS analysis
one paragraph of ETHOS analysis
one paragraph of LOGOS analysis
one paragraph of FALLACIES analysis (talk about Hasty Generalization and so on that are on his arguments, you have to analyze them) *ask to yourself these questions to help you to write the 5th paragraph, which is about the fallacies: are they any fallacies? and do they hurt his arguments?
-Conclusion- echo the thesis and wrap it up.
#Discuss and identify each Pathos/Ethos/Logos seperately: 1 paragraph each (must be clear and organized)
#One seperate paragraph for Fallacies (differentiate each of them, such as “Hasty Generalization” etc)
#DO NOT agree or disagree with what Richard Estrada said, and DO NOT summarize, and DO NOT say what he should have done- just CRITICIZE the arguments that are not strong enough and so on.
#Stay on the topic (Rhetorical Analysis of his argument)
#Discuss a little bit about his biography (I will type the biography that is given by my teacher at the very bottom of this page, do not copy it)
PS: you should be able to differentiate ethos, pathos, and logos, and fallacies
Read the book “Everything is An Argument” to be more clear.
PLEASE BE CLEAR & FLOWING
MOST IMPORTANTLY, FOLLOW ALL OF THE DIRECTIONS.
Let me know if you have any question.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS PAPER HAS TO BE SPECIFIC, YOU MUST FOLLOW ALL OF THE INSTRUCTIONS ABOVE.
BIOGRAPHY OF RICHARD ESTRADA:
Richard Estrada was the associate editor of the Dallas Morning News editorial page, and a syndicated columnist whose essays appeared regularly in the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, and other major newspapers. He was best known as a thoughtful, independent-minded commentator or immigration and social issues. Before joining the Dallas Morning News in 1988, Estrada worked as a congressional staff member and as a researcher at the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington D.C. In the 1990s, he was appointed to the US Commission on Immigration Reform. Following his death at the age of 49 in 1999, the Richard Estrada Fellowship in Immigration Studies was established in his honor.
Excerpt From Essay:
I really do appreciate HelpMyEssay.com. I'm not a good writer and the service really gets me going in the right direction. The staff gets back to me quickly with any concerns that I might have and they are always on time.
I have had all positive experiences with HelpMyEssay.com. I will recommend your service to everyone I know. Thank you!
I am finished with school thanks to HelpMyEssay.com. They really did help me graduate college..