Essay Instructions: A.
Refer to Order A2097703 for original work.
WOTKING TOPIC IS ; Establishing an NP led wellness and recover center for deinstitutionalized individuals in Bessemer, Alabama.
B.
This is graduate level work. Instructor found previous work not up to par.
1. Chapter three needs work. Needs to be re-written.
2. Can it just bi a descriptive study? If not, please cover required areas with more content and information. Data analysis plan is needed for chapter 3. Instructor feels paper contradicts several areas.
3. All required areas that must be addressed with clarity and per their instructions.
4. The instructor dos not want sentences to begin with ‘the’, ‘it’, ‘there’, ‘and’ , ‘this’.
5. The instructor does not like bullets…prefer numbers.
6. A table of contents is needed.
7. Appendices included. Should they be discussed in body of paper.
C,
Please refer to Order A2097703 for information bout paper.
Also sending draft of proposal defense for editing.
CHAPTER 3 IS A CONCERN. ORIGINALLY WAS DOING A BUSINESS PLAN, SO NEED TO WORK AROUND AND INCLUDE THIS.
Would be helpful to have same writer for all three items if possible.
Thanks.
To be clear:
1. Chapter three needs re-write and proposal data analysis. Actual analyses will be in next order, along with chapters 4 and 5.
2. I need a POWERPOINT presentation for project proposal.
3. I am ok to change title. But too late to do further research.
4. I don’t know what kind of study this is.
you don't have to use 50 references
reference page already included
Project defense checklist
PROBLEM
• The title is appropriate and fits within the DNP program objectives.
• The problem presentation includes background information.
• The subject of the problem is clearly identified and defined.
• The scope of project is realistic and appropriate. Notes:
ANALYSES/FRAMEWORK
• The nature of the project is clearly expressed and discussed.
• Project (research) question and hypothesis have substance influencing processes and/or systems that directly or indirectly affect professional practice.
• Theoretical/Conceptual/Practice Framework is evident and appropriate. Notes:
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
• Objectives are feasible and measurable.
• Evaluation measures are aligned with objectives.
• The significance of the project reveals elements/factors that impact health care services. Notes:
ACTION PLAN/METHOD
• The setting and group/population are clearly described.
• The tools and measures are described.
• The resources, supports and risks, and threats and benefits are noted.
• Analysis/evaluation plan is delineated.
• Timeframe is feasible. Notes:
APPROVALS
• Informed Consent, if necessary, meets human subject requirements.
• All required and mandated approvals are in place. Notes:
WRITING AND ORGANIZATION
• The APA format is followed appropriately.
• Writing is clear and concise.
• Manuscript design is acceptable. Notes:
DECISION
Signature of the Doctoral Capstone Committee Chair signifies final decision.
Proposal Acceptance
Conditional Acceptance With Revisions;
Without Repeat Proposal Defense
Conditional Acceptance With Revisions;
With Repeat Proposal Defense Recommendations
Proposal Rejection
DECISION DEFINITIONS
Proposal Acceptance (Level I) The Doctoral Capstone Committee Chair will file approval of the DNP Capstone Project Proposal on behalf of the student and doctoral capstone committee members. The Doctoral Capstone Committee Chair’s signature signifies approval of the doctoral student’s candidacy; implying that the student may use the Candidate status (C) next to his or her name as appropriate until graduation at which time the Candidate will be conferred the degree of Doctor of Nursing Practice (D.N.P.).
Conditional Acceptance
With Revisions; Without Repeat Proposal Defense (Level II) The student will file a final/revised project proposal to the Doctoral Capstone Committee Chair within six (6) weeks of the proposed defense meeting.
Conditional Acceptance
With Revisions; With
Repeat Proposal Defense Recommendations (Level III) The student will develop a significantly revised or new proposal. The Doctoral Capstone Committee Chair will work with the student on the revision. The Committee will reconvene and review the revised proposal and all prior steps will be repeated.
Proposal Defense and Approval with PPT presentation
Oral Defense Process
The student will begin by presenting a twenty to thirty minute power point presentation of the project.
In the remaining time, the students committee members will ask the student questions to ensure the student can defend the project results. After the committee completes the questioning, the student will be excused from the call while the committee makes its decision. The mentor verbally informs the student of the committees decision. The decision may include required changes in the Capstone or manuscripts. Committee members may elect to sign off, or wait to see the changes. The mentor will not sign until the student makes all changes.
If the student does not pass the defense, the students Capstone committee will develop a plan of action for the student to follow prior to scheduling another Capstone defense or alternately a plan of review. ?
Technical Requirements in Writing the Capstone
The DNP Program requires that Capstone papers be written according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed. Washington, DC.). The publication manual from APA serves as the official guide for papers, scholarly works, for both faculty and students at American Sentinel. Students are held accountable for following these guidelines in scholarly works/papers for grading and academic honesty purposes.
Lines of Communication
Capstone Data Guidelines
The Capstone may involve original research, secondary analysis of an existing database, or a joint study involving a faculty member or researcher. If the student conducts a secondary data analysis, the student will need to develop original research questions, use a conceptual framework or model, and develop a detailed data analysis plan. Ownership of Data/Authorship of Published Manuscript Guidelines Original Research: The ownership of data originating from a students original research rests with the primary researcher. Therefore, it is not mandatory for faculty to co-author any of the publications evolving from the research. However, the student may request a Capstone Mentor or committee member to be a co-author on publications if the student so desires.
Whoever originally plans and implements a study maintains ownership of the data unless a
written agreement to the contrary is negotiated prior to initiating Capstone proposal
development. If a secondary analysis is conducted, the owner of the data has the right to be a coauthor
on publications emanating from the data set.
A student performing a secondary analysis must be the first author on required Capstone
publications. To avoid confusion and conflict later, if additional publications are forthcoming from the secondary analysis, ranking of authorship must be negotiated and preferably put in writing prior to the initiation of manuscripts. Although the owner of the data may be listed as a co-author on Capstone publications, the individual may not write any portion of the manuscript since publications are the outcome of students Capstone work and must be evaluated by the Capstone committee.
?
EXAMPLE
Working Outline: Chapter 1
1.
Working Title
Differentiated Practice: A Model for Nursing Future
2. Problem Statement
The current model of acute nursing care delivery is not sustainable due to internal and
external pressures.
3. Background
The acute care patient has multiple co-morbidities increasing the complexity of care at
the bedside. Federal mandates to meet quality, technological requirements, and
satisfaction measures result in decreased reimbursement putting more pressure on acute
care organizations to redefine how they deliver care.
4. Purpose Statement
The purpose of this study is to implement and evaluate the viability of the Schmidt Model
of Differentiated Practice.
5. Significance of the Project ?
Given the trends and challenges for acute care executives, the need for a new model of
care delivery can not be understated. There is a need to develop innovative models that
leverage the educational level and preparation of bedside caregivers while preserving
costs, quality, and satisfaction. Differentiated practice gives the acute care executives
that option.
6. Nature of the Project
This study is a case study of the relationship between the Schmidt Model of
Differentiated Practice, cost effectiveness, quality outcomes, and patient satisfaction.
7. Hypothesis or Research Question
Is the Schmidt Model of Differentiated Practice a viable alternative to deliver low cost,
high quality care with strong patient satisfaction?
8. Theoretical Framework
The theories for consideration in this study include: Expectancy Theory; Donabedianís
Structure, Process, Outcome Theory; Bolman and Dealís Reframing Organizations
Theory; Balance Theory; Meleis Transitions Theory, and Likertís Theory of the
Participative Organization
9.
Definitions
Differentiated nursing practice
Models of nursing care
Innovative care delivery models
Associate degree nurse
Bachelor degree nurse
Registered Nurse
Licensed Practical Nurse
Certified Nursing Assistant
Nurse staffing models
Quality
Satisfaction
?
Reimbursement
Cost Effective
Value based purchasing
10. Scope and Limitations
The scope of this project includes three nursing departments (medical-surgical, telemetry,
intensive care) within a community hospital. This project will encompass 140 acute care
beds and approximately 200 FTEs. The study will compare cost, quality, and satisfaction
between the medical-surgical unit that implemented the Schmidt Model of Differentiated
Practice and the two departments with non-differentiated practice (telemetry and
intensive care). Limitations of this study include data availability, survey data
interpretations, and time constraints due to the infancy of the implementation of the
model.
Types of Capstone Projects
The program requires a research-based Capstone Project. The subject area will be determined by
the student in consultation with the Associate Dean/Doctoral Advisor and must meet the
academic standards of the University. All research is subject to the review and supervision of
the American Sentinel Institutional Review Board. Details are found in a subsequent section.
There are a number of types of Capstone Projects. Below is a list of acceptable types. Additional
types can be considered after discussion with the Associate Dean.
Traditional Dissertation
Case Study
Program Evaluation
Community Assessment
Business Plan
Quality Improvement Project
Theoretical Model Development
Each tittle heading much me included
CHAPTER 1
Chapter 1 is an overview of the project. This chapter contains no personal pronouns.
Introduction
The purpose of an introduction is to capture the attention of the reader, create a sense of urgency
about the problem to be investigated, and set the stage for the sections that follow. The
introduction:
1. Puts the project in perspective/context.
2. Establishes the need for the project.
3. Alerts the reader to what will follow.
4. Orients the reader to the crucial stages of the project.
5. Catches the attention and interest of the reader.
An introduction is usually between 2 and 4 pages.
Problem Statement
The problem statement section deals with the specific problem under investigation. The
statement itself is concise (between 100 and 250 words) but contains sufficient information to
persuade the reader that the project is feasible, appropriate, and worthwhile. The statement
relates to a current problem in the learners profession, and the problems solution involves
leadership skills. The project methodology, which guides the project, is both discernible and defensible.
?
Background
The length of the background section offsets the brevity of the problem statement section. It elaborates why the problem is of pressing societal concern or theoretical interest. The reader will be able to discern the seriousness of the problem and understand the need for its further elucidation. Such tools as situation analysis, gap analysis, previously administered instruments are among the tools that may be discussed as part of the introduction. This section is generally 35 pages in length.
Purpose
The purpose statement section details the reason why the project is conducted. It describes what is attempting to be accomplished by conducting the project. After reading the purpose statement, the reader will be able to judge the effectiveness of the approach and the importance of the project. The purpose will also be related to an important issue regarding leadership. In most proposals and dissertations, this section is about æ of a page.
Significance of the Study
The significance section elaborates on the purpose statement. It justifies the reason for the project and the contribution it will make to a discipline, a profession, and/or society at large. The
significance section establishes a global reason for doing a worthwhile project. This section will explain why the project is a unique approach and who will benefit from its completion. It articulates the specific sense in which an original contribution has been made to knowledge in the selected field. The significance section should be about one page in length.
The Nature of the Project
The Nature of the Project section (about 2-5 pages) is also called the synopsis of the design section. This section is a forum for distinguishing the methodology used to in this project from other possible methodologies.. This section puts the project in context with similar types, e.g. case study, historical, correlational, evaluative, phenomenological, experimental, quasi-experimental. It justifies the appropriateness of the approach and accomplishes the goals of the study.
Hypothesis or Research Question(s)
All projects have at least 1 research question. Depending on the project design, there may also be hypotheses. In either case, a clear research question is written to focus the project.
Theoretical Framework
In nearly every sub-field of every subject, there are a number of competing concepts and
theories. The concepts and theories selected shape the project. A theoretical framework helps to place a project in perspective and supports projects aimed at looking for relationships among variables, while setting limits. In order to meet criteria, the theoretical framework must demonstrate a thorough grasp of the important issues, perspectives, and controversies in the field under examination, as they relate to the project at hand, indicating where the current project will
fit within this logical landscape.
This section is usually 2 to 4 pages. A diagram of the theory is required.
Definitions
This section defines the terms that may be new to the reader. Some more common terms can be defined in the body of the paper. However, terms should be defined, according to the specific way they are used in the project. A good rule is to assume that someone internationally will be reading the paper; therefore, define the terms unique to the United States.
Scope and Limitations
The Scope and Limitations of the project are discussed in the same section because these items belong together. The project is bounded by these items. Scope refers to the inclusions and span of the project, while limitations refer to the exclusions and constraints of the project. For example, for a research project, Scope and Limitations are often conceptualized to delineate special characteristics of the sample and population used in the research. For instance, if the population is a sample by convenience and not randomized, then, it cannot be generally applied to a larger population, only suggested. If the focus is one aspect, such as achievement tests, then the information is only as good as the test itself. Limitations to the project can also be discussed within a conceptual framework; for instance, an examination of disciplinary action in a given
organization might be limited to the initial and second "offense" phases. Justification would be given for the boundary placed. Occasionally, limiting factors of a practical nature, such as constraints of time, money, and human resources, in as far as these have notable impact on the project, can be discussed. Limitations also include issues that affect the character of the data as well as the analysis and interpretation of the data. For example, brief indications of any important biasing encountered during the collection of data would be noted. Such items receive more detailed treatment in later sections of the dissertation.
This section is approximately one page in length.
Summary
A summary section should provide key points covered.
CHAPTER 2: Literature Review
Introduction ?
Since this is the plan for a research study, the proposal format might read: ìThe intent of Chapter II is to provide a review of the literature that will guide the research study or major treatise.î After opening with the researches purpose, the following topics, among others, are covered:
1. Historical overview
2. Current Findings
The order of these topics ranges from the general to the specific and relate specifically to the questions to be answered.
This chapter provides a synthesis of literature and research studies, including the theoretical rationale. There needs to be a differentiation between literature review and research review.
The literature review is not an annotated bibliography, a book report, or journal critique of prior work. Instead, it is an integrated document organized by the logic of the topic and its major themes or concepts. Seminal works in the field are examined in context along with current research. Authors are grouped into positions where appropriate. There is evidence of interpretations made by the learner that are separate from the commentary and analysis found in the published studies or reviews. Each study in the section is directly related to the topic and the problem under investigation.
Conclusion
The conclusion to Chapter 2 makes explicit how the literature review contributes to this research study or major treatise. This is a good place to reiterate the research question(s).
Summary
The summary reminds the reader of the major points covered in the review of literature.
CHAPTER 3: Methods
The project design is an elaboration of the Nature of the Research section from Chapter One. It clearly states and justifies the rationale for the use of a specific project paradigm. The project design logically derives from the problem under investigation, the theoretical framework of the study, and the purpose of the project. It shows sufficient details to solve the problem and answer the research questions. The type of project design is justified and appropriate for the desired outcomes. This section should also clearly delineate and explicate the type of methods used (e.g. correlational, historical, phenomenological, Delphi, etc.) Any deviation from the steps necessary
to fulfill the project design is explained and fully justified; otherwise, the reader may conclude that the procedure has been flawed. The design provides a clear and well-justified sequence of events. Uncontrollable eruptions of the real world occasionally may alter the intended methodological sequence. These changes should be fully explained and documented, along with the rationale for the resulting alterations.
?
Project Design
This section describes and justifies the rational for the use of the specific project design. This section explains the appropriateness of the design to achieve the desired outcomes. It also explains the methods used, providing a clear and well-justified sequence of events.
Instruments
This section explains the instruments used to answer the research question, establishing the validity and reliability of the instruments. This section should also explain the rationale of the instruments selection. In this section, the instruments used to collect information will be described. What will they be? How will they be chosen?
A detailed rationale for the selection of each item of the instruments is necessary for the reader to grasp the items purpose and appropriateness. When explaining the presence of selected crucial items in the instruments, reasons for the particular conceptual structure of those items, and why this particular structure was chosen over other alternatives, the researcher should help the reader To determine whether the instrument meets criteria.
Data Collection, Management and Analysis Plan
Techniques of collecting and managing the collected data are delineated and defended. For
example, interviewing, content analysis, observation, etc., are properly used and directly related to the problem, purpose of the project, and research question(s). Information is provided on gaining entry to project sites (if needed) and how approval will be obtained to collect data. In instances where reliance must be placed on written sources (crucial interviewees are deceased or incapacitated; key subjects are outside the scope of ethical research, such as hospitalized behavioral health patients), a full accounting is required of the textual analytic modes selected for use, such as hermeneutics, deconstruction, dialectic, etymology, phenomenology, sociopolitical analytic techniques, linguistic analysis, numerical contenting of phrases, metaphors, and contexts, as well as other modes.
The procedures for collecting and managing data are thoroughly and clearly stated. Delineation of data security and maintenance of human subject protection, when necessary, is provided. Reasons are provided for the particular method of data collection selected. It is clear how the data will be analyzed.
Validity
This section explains how the design achieves its intended purpose. The aspects truth value, applicability, consistency, and neutrality -that are relevant should be described: internal validity, external validity, reliability, and objectivity. ?
Validity refers to the extent to which measurements achieve their intended purpose. The
researcher needs to determine the validity, both internally and externally, of the design.
Methodology Appropriateness
In this section, a justification for the methods used in data collection and data analysis is presented. In sum, the appropriateness of the methods of data collection and data analysis for the chosen project (e.g., experimental, quasi-experimental, non-experimental, predictive, methodological, historical, inductive qualitative, quasi-deductive qualitative, case study, longitudinal) is demonstrated, and a justification is offered.
Feasibility and Appropriateness
This section explains the means by which the project will be conducted. In this section support, services, costs, and any other resources needed are identified. The facilities and organizational arrangements available are adequate. The suggested approach to the problem is reasonable in terms of the overall costs of other possible approaches.
Summary
The summary reminds the reader of the major points covered in the methodology. ?
CHAPTER 4 : Finding
Chapter four provides the reader with the details of data collection and data analysis. Chapter four ranges from 10-25 pages in length. Following the introductory paragraph where the researcher reminds the reader of the purpose of the project, the purpose of chapter four presents the findings.
The Purpose of the Project
This introductory section should restate the purpose of the project, the data collection methods, and how the project was conducted, including the number and types of participants.
Discussion of Demographics (if appropriate). This section should describe in detail the targeted population or facilities, the number contacted, the percentage participating, and the details of who participated. This data is best presented in tables detailing those demographic details that are important to the study.
Data Analysis
This section addresses the analytic methods that were used and why they were appropriate for this project. Note any changes or additional analysis that were added since the approval of the project and why they were needed. Include in this area any special observations about the data set (e.g., only those over 65 participated when it was anticipated that the sample would include persons 55-75).
Research Question(s)
Restate the research questions and the data analysis that addresses the question. Do not discuss the significance of the findings here; this will be done in Chapter 5. Use tables carefully and be sure to include verbal descriptions of what is presented in each table or figure.
Reliability / Validity
Discuss any reliability and validity testing that was conducted or any factors which could
significantly impact on the reliability and validity of the project.
Conclusion
This section should have one to two paragraphs summarizing the findings.
CHAPTER 5: Discussion
Introduction
Chapter five summarizes presented in chapter four, but with a caveat ñ who and why would
leaders care about the results? The intent of chapter 5 is to form a broader meaning about the data analysis presented in chapter 4 and is organized by the following discussion topics: findings and analysis, implications, and recommendations. It should allow for subsequent leadership implementation and actions, and to suggest studies for future research based on the result of the project.
Interpretation of the Findings
This section provides an interpretation of the major findings in the context of the overall purpose of the project. It provides the answer(s) to the research question(s).
Inferences about the Important Findings
What new knowledge or similar findings were found that added to the body of knowledge and
based on the theoretical concept explained in chapter 1? There must be a clear relationship between the theory that drove the project to the findings presented and analyzed against these for theories in chapter 5 (summary format).
It should be clear to the reader that the findings were driven by the project with the findings directly related to the question. No unrelated information findings should be presented unless the findings add to the body of knowledge and are directed related to the research question and problem statement under research. A common error is the presentation of data that has nothing to do with the problem statement or research question.
Compare each theme to literature findings with sources for similarities and differences starting with the most significant theme not found in previous studies and discuss the themes importance of application to leadership. Meanings of any gaps or similarities to literature is critically analyzed and discussed for every theme ñ what does the findings mean to leaders, and why would society care about the results?
Implications of Analysis for Leaders
Chapter five should report findings in chapter four reporting a knowledge not reported by any ther literature. Why should leaders care?
Recommendations
Recommendations based on the findings should be for society in general, and to specific leaders as mentioned in the significance section. A summary of the major findings concludes the findings and interpretations section with a transitional paragraph introducing the recommendations section. Recommendations should follow the same logical flow as the findings and interpretations. Include a narrative of topics that need closer examination to generate a new round of questions. Be sure to make specific recommendations for leaders in the field and policy makers.
Recommendations for Future Research
Recommendations for future research should be detailed and extensive. This is a key area that students often fail to elaborate on ---what could other researchers do with the new information to find out more gaps as indicated by the new results? New doctoral learners often look in this section for ideas on problems that remain to be solved so elaborating with detail leaves a legacy to new doctoral students to continue.
Summary
Three to four paragraphs summarize the purpose of the project, major findings, and
recommendations for action and future research.
?
I
There are faxes for this order.
