Search Our Essay Database

Essay Instructions: 1. The point of the assessment is to demonstrate ability to put forward a rational case for a policy, and also to be able to critique such a case in a systematic way. It is NOT therefore an academic discussion of an issue, which puts forward the pros and cons and comes to a reasoned conclusion. It is critiquing it.

2. In particular this means that the part is not simply putting forward alternatives, or the downside of the particular policy proposal, but should be a critique of the policy argument itself. A good rational case will make it seem like the proposal is the obvious and best solution for a given problem - you task is then to attack this on the grounds that e.g. the problem is not defined well, the solution isn't actually the best one available etc.

Critique ‘rational’ policy on grounds of:
• problem definition: plausibility?
coherence? honesty?
• feasibility: could it work? if not, why not?
• justice: is it right?
• alternatives: might there be better ways of
achieving the stated aims? or alternative,
better aims?

This assessmenti is about Government’s policy pps23: Planning and Pollution Control (2004). Annex 2 which is addressing the issue of development on land affected by contamination in England.
You do not need write introduction, just start to critique it.



There are faxes for this order.

Essay Instructions: Format APA

What measures do you think would be effective to achieve the goal of
pollution control and air quality improvement?
Are there injustices built into such measures?
If so, is there any practical way to avoid them?
What are the possible ethical considerations of banning or restricting
Third World countries' access to advanced, yet polluting, technologies such
as fluorocarbons?

The book is Moral Issues in Business by William H. Shaw and Vicent Barry
ISBN 0-534-53595-X

Essay Instructions: Read Case 7.2 titled "Poverty and Pollution," prior to starting this assignment.

Write a 6-8 page paper in which you:
1.Determine the ethical implications of businesses polluting in a third world country. Explain your rationale.
2.Suggest the reasons a business may conduct operations in a third world country and disregard any standards of pollution control.
3.It has been said that pollution is the price of progress. Assess the connections between economic progress and development, on the one hand, and pollution controls and environmental protection, on the other.
4.Support the argument that human beings have a moral right to a livable environment regardless of the country they live in.
5.Take a position on whether wealthy nations have an obligation to provide poorer nations with, or help them develop, greener industries and sources of energy. Explain your rationale.
6.Propose a plan for uniform global pollution control standards and how you would enforce them.
7.Use at least three (3) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
?Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
?Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student?s name, the professor?s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
?Recommend ways in which businesses can be partners with nature by applying the concepts of business ethics, business ecology, and environmental ethics.
?Use technology and information resources to research issues in business ethics.
?Write clearly and concisely about business ethics using proper writing mechanics.

Essay Instructions: Can current pollution strategies improve air quality? It has been suggested that the major air quality improvement measure would be to severely limit our use of the automobile? What measures do you think would be effective to achieve the goal of pollution control and air quality improvement? Are there injustices built into such measures? If so, is there any practical way to avoid them? What are the possible ethical considerations of banning or restricting Third World countries'' access to advanced, yet polluting, technologies such as fluorocarbons?
read pages 482 through 592 in Shaw and Barry