Ford Pinto Essays and Research Papers

Instructions for Ford Pinto College Essay Examples

Title: utilitarian analysis

  • Total Pages: 5
  • Words: 1587
  • References:3
  • Citation Style: APA
  • Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: Read carefully the Case Study, "The Ford Pinto Case" in DeGeorge, pp 298-299. Then, you are to write a paper in which you decide, on the basis of the best utilitarian analysis you can construct, whether Ford Motor's decision to produce as it did was ethically justifiable. Your paper should show that you understand what using a utilitarian approach to evaluating a moral issue involves. You should clearly describe the action that you are evaluating. You should present the various considerations that lead you to make the moral judgment you make about the action. Be sure to consider all the consequences of the action you analyze for all those affected by the action. Do not focus only on the cost-benefit analysis presented in the case.

Although you should go through the steps of a utilitarian analysis before you write the paper, the paper should not list all the steps. Rather, in writing your paper assume you are writing for a general audience (many of whom may disagree with you), and write in such a way as to try and convince your readers, by the strength of your analysis, that you are correct in your moral judgment. Hence, you should present and develop the utilitarian arguments that lead to your judgment, and you should not simply state your beliefs. Your analysis should conclude, as a result of the utilitarian analysis you have made, with the conclusion to which that analysis leads. Be careful not to prejudge the case either by describing it as unethical (or ethically justifiable) to begin with or by concluding it is justifiable (or unjustifiable) before you finish the analysis. To help you through the steps of a utilitarian analysis there's a guide on page 56 in your text.

Your paper should be 3 to 5 pages and formatted double-spaced, font size 12, with one-inch margins.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:

Works Cited

DeGeorge, Richard T. "Ethical Responsibilities in Large Corporations."

Horas, Matthew R. "The Ford Pinto." Retrieved online:

"Utilitarianism" Trinity University. Retrieved online:

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: White Collar Crime

  • Total Pages: 11
  • Words: 3070
  • Works Cited:0
  • Citation Style: MLA
  • Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: 13 Book Reference including the set text(No Newspaper

Set Text:

David O. FRIEDRICHS (1996) Trusted Criminals: white Collar Crime in
Contemporary Society, Wadsworth.

Write a case study on the Ford Pinto White Collar crime Case so that it
identifies and discusses the failure of regulations of Corporate behaviour.

The Ford Pinto case study must include the following:

a) Document the regulatory failure in a brief summary of facts;
b) Incude a literature review synthesising the existing literature
relevant to the area of regulation;
c) Provide a case analysis, explaining how and why the failure occurred;
d) Analyse and evaluate the policy and regulatory implications of the case;
e) adhere to normal academic standards by way of structure, argument,
presentation and referencing.
e) Case study research must be relatively in-depth;
f) Case study must be predominantly analytic and explanatory;
g) Case study must concisely describe the regulatory failure;
h) White collar crime and regulatory literature is to be used to explain
case study, and examine its implications;
i) White collar crime key terms and concepts involved in this case study
must be explained;
j) Information used must be well intergrated.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Works Cited:

Works Cited

Adams, Guy B. And Balfour, Danny L. 1998. Unmasking Administrative Evil. London: Sage Publications.

Cullen, Francis T.; Makestaad, William J. And Gray Cavender. 1987. Corporate Crime Under Attack: The Ford Pinto Case and Beyond. Cincinnati: Anderson.

Dowie, Mark. 1977. "Pinto Madness." In The Ford Pinto Case: A Study in Applied Ethics. Douglas Birsch and John H. Fielder, eds. Albany: SUNY Press, 1994.

Friedrichs, David O. 1996. Trusted Criminals: White Collar Crime in Contemporary Society. New York: Wadsworth.

Gusfield, Joseph. 1980. The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hagan, Frank E. 1994. Introduction to Criminology. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Kramer, Ronald C. 1982. "Corporate Crime: An Organizational Perspective." In White Collar and Economic Crime: Multidisciplinary and Crossnational Perspectives. Peter Wickman and Timothy Dailey, eds. Greenwich: JAI Press.

Kunen, James S. 1994. Reckless Disregard: Corporate Greed, Government Indifference and the Kentucky School Bus Crash. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Mashaw, Jerry and Harfst, David. 1990. The Struggle for Auto Safety. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Rosoff, Stephen M.; Pontell, Henry and Tillman, Robert. 2002. Profit Without Honor: White Collar Crime and the Looting of America. 2nd ed.

Simon, David and Eitzen, D. Stanley. 1990. Elite Deviance. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Strobel, Lee Patrick. 1980. Reckless Homicide: Ford Pinto's Trial. South Bend, Indiana: And Books.

Vaughn, Diane. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Weick, Karl E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: Case Review Ford Pinto Fires

  • Total Pages: 2
  • Words: 462
  • Bibliography:1
  • Citation Style: APA
  • Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: Read case 10# Ford Pinto Fires, pages 146 -150 in the book (Business Ethics: A Stakeholder and Issues Management Approach). Summaries the case and write your opinion about the case. take a side ether with or against and answer 4 questions in page 150

please cite the book only
the book is available in

go to log in then enter:
password: supermoe7

go to my books click on the book then click on read now.
(THE PAGES ON THE CHEGG WEBSITE ARE DIFFERENT FROM THE PAGES ON THE BOOK) Please note that the correct page number appears on the pages of the actual book on the website not the page numbers that appear while switching from page to page.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:

In the early 1970s, Ford was rushing to design its Pinto model automobile to capture the entry-level car market. Whereas the typical development cycle for new automobiles was then nearly four years, Ford had condensed that time to approximately one half as long, partly by omitting various safety tests or by executing them contemporaneously with other production and design steps to safe time and capture the 1971 market. The Pinto was purposely designed as a very small vehicle to comply with directions and design specifications issued by the top level of management to produce a vehicle that weighed less than 2,000 pounds and that cost less than $2,000, the approximate equivalent of $11,000 in today's dollar value.

By the time the model was ready for rollout, Ford engineers had already identified a serious and potentially deadly problem with the Pinto's design. Specifically, because of its very compact size and the positioning of the gas tank to maximize trunk space, there was insufficient space to protect the gas tank from being ruptured in rear-end crashes of 30 miles per hour or greater. Ford's tests proved that the gas tank was extremely vulnerable and that it would likely result in deadly fires in many ordinary rear-end collisions in situations where the collisions themselves would not necessarily have caused significant bodily injury or deaths to occupants of the vehicle. Ford's tests also determined that the gas tanks could be protected by the installation of a simple part that would have cost the company $11 per vehicle. To make matters even worse, Ford was also aware that rear-end collisions typically caused the Pinto's doors to malfunction and become inoperable, sealing occupants inside the vehicles to burn to death when their cars caught fire.

Because the applicable government safety tests had been changed to include rear-end crashes only after the Pinto was already in production, the company was not under any statutory obligation to meet the new government standards. The company calculated the price of recalling the Pinto and of installing the $11 part on all 12.5 million affected vehicles at $137 million. It also calculated the total monetary cost of paying out the damage awards to the owners of 2,100 Pintos statistically likely to be involved in burns from crashes (including approximately 180 injuries from burns and 180 deaths from burns) and determined that the total cost of compensating the victims of the design defect would be less than $50 million. As a result of the decision to value corporate profits over human lives and welfare, hundreds of people died horrific deaths and hundreds more suffered painful and debilitating injuries and disabilities. Today, the decision by the company to value corporate profits over human lives and welfare stands as a model of bad corporate ethics and ethical decision making in business organizations.

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: Engineering Ethics

  • Total Pages: 9
  • Words: 3224
  • Sources:9
  • Citation Style: MLA
  • Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: Paper Topic:

Individual Automobile Safety Technology

As automobiles become more sophisticated with more and more electronics, the ethical issue has been raised as to whether or not all the electronics adds to or diminishes our safety in the car. Do we really need electronics in the dashboard that will allow the driver to update his or her Facebook page while driving? This group should examine, as part of their research, data regarding accident rates while talking on cellphones and engaging in other distracting activities. Where should society draw the line in allowing these technologies inside a car? [For $2,645, Lexus will be happy to supply you with Facebook, Bing, Sirius Sports and Stocks, etc. in your dashboard.]

Writing Prompt:

My assignment is to do a 9 page cost-benefit analysis of the new technologies and electronics in today's car. Here's the outline that I created for this assignment. Please follow this outline as best as you can.

A. Introduction
1. Current US socio-economy
2. Contribution of Automotive Industry to the United States
- Talk about how automotive industry affect United States overall GDP.
3. Current and future trends in automotive industry

B. Cost-benefit analysis for Automakers
1. Marketability of new car technologies
- Talk about how the new electronics/technologies added in cars attract consumer.
- Are these technologies affordable to consumer considering current US economy?
- Do cost-benefit analysis of developing and adding new technologies in car.
- Do these new technologies increase automaker's profit?

2. Significant loss due to product recall
- Research about any complaints given by the customers about these technologies in cars.
- Research about product recalls due to electrical failures, accidents, and safety risks of new technologies in cars.
- Talk about how product recalls/getting sued by the victim impact the automaker companies financially.

3. Business vs. ethical consideration
- Consider the Ford Pinto case.

C. Cost-benefit analysis for government
1. What's the impact of keep updating the regulation for new technology in cars?
2. Cost-effectiveness of a law banning the use of car technology by drivers
- Refer to one article that I uploaded about the cost effectiveness of a law banning the use of cell phone by drivers, and summarize it.
- Do cost-benefit analysis of government decision regarding law banning the use of technology by drivers

D. Conclusion

I will provide the pdf files of related articles for your reference. Thank you.

There are faxes for this order.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:


Bazerman, M.H. And Tensbrunsel, A.E. (2011, April). Ethical Breakdown. Harvard Business Review (HBR). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review. Retrieved

Cutler, D. And Massy-Beresford, H,(2012, October 10). Timeline: Major global recalls in the auto industry. Reuters. Retreived

Isidore, C. (2010, February 4). Toyota recall costs: $2 billion. New York, NY: CNN Retrieved

KPMG Global Automotive Executive Survey (2012). Retreived

Lee, T. (2011, August 14). GM to recall at least 38,000 cars; $25 billion loss on auto bailout. Retreived

Scheid, J. And Chavis, J.C. (2012, May 24) Motor Vehicle Accidents; What is the Real Cost? [Web page]. Retrieved

Sperber, D., Shiell, A., and Fyie, K. (2010). The cost effectiveness of a law banning the use of cellular phones by drivers. Health Economics, 19, 1212-1225.

Thompson, M.F. And Merchant, A.A. (2012). Employment and Economic growth in the U.S. Automotive Manufacturing Industry: Considering the Impact of American and Japanese Automakers. Indiana Business Review (IBR), Kelly School of Business, Indiana University.

White, G. (2011, February 10). Why 2011 U.S. GDP and the auto industry are inextricably linked. Business insider. Retrieved

[Type text] [Type text] [Type text]

Order Custom Essay On This Topic
Request A Custom Essay On This Topic Request A Custom Essay
“I really do appreciate I'm not a good writer and the service really gets me going in the right direction. The staff gets back to me quickly with any concerns that I might have and they are always on time.’’ Tiffany R
“I have had all positive experiences with I will recommend your service to everyone I know. Thank you!’’ Charlotte H
“I am finished with school thanks to They really did help me graduate college.’’ Bill K