Books Essays and Research Papers

Instructions for Books College Essay Examples

Title: Book Report

  • Total Pages: 4
  • Words: 1433
  • References:0
  • Citation Style: APA
  • Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: Book Report Assignment Options



1. You may do the book report on the “Property” by Valerie Martin.


The book report must be at least four pages double spaced, and not greater that 5 pages. Remember your 1-inch margins. You are to use a Times Roman 12 point font. Like most written papers, you need an Introduction, body and conclusion. Do not forget to put your name, date, class, and cite the book. All cites must be done in MLA format. Make sure you also site in the proper manner in the paper.


The introduction paragraph introduces the book and it must include the following:


1. You Name, Date
2. The title of the book
3. The author’s name
4. Copyright
5. Describe the setting of the book
6. Identify the main theme of the book, or books used

The next part of the paper will be the body. This must include all of the following:


1. Use your own words and talk about the story.
2. Describe the characters
3. Does the author use metaphor? If author does use metaphor, explain where and how.
4. What images does the author paint for the reader?
5. Does the author use Narrative? If the author does, what kind of narrative is it and how is it employed.
6. How does the author use lyric and symbolism?
7. How does the author use diction? How is the diction portrayed?
8. Did the text used capture your attention? Why?
9. Would you identify the author as passive or active?

The final part of the paper is the conclusion.

This is where you give your critic of the book.

1. Would you recommend this novel? Why or Why not?
2. Would you consider this book literature?
Excerpt From Essay:
References:


Martin, Valerie. Property. New York: Nan a. Talese, 2003.

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: Winning Is the Only Thing book

  • Total Pages: 3
  • Words: 785
  • Bibliography:0
  • Citation Style: MLA
  • Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: Book Review Instructions
PURPOSE: The supplementary readings and written reviews are designed to accomplish three goals. First, to gain an understanding of the specific historical information contained in the book. Secondly, to acquire experience in analyzing written material by determining the underlying thesis of the work and examining the author’s use of evidence in support of that thesis. Third, to increase skills in accurate written communication.
DEFINITION: A critical book review is a critique of a book containing analysis of the author’s background, the thesis of the book, and the material in the book that the author presents in support of the thesis. A book review IS NOT a book report. The objective of the review IS NOT to present the book in a condensed form.
CONTENT: Your review should consist of six (6) paragraphs. It MUST be structured in the following manner.
Paragraph 1: Introduction
Introduce the book
Paragraph 2: Author Information
The reviewer should investigate the author’s life in such sources as Who’s Who in America, the Directory of American Scholars, or Contemporary Authors. Some of these sources may be found online, others may not. If not, a trip to any academic library will accomplish the goal. The reviewer should consider, for example, the author’s academic and professional experience, the title/subjects of other books the author has published, his/her specialty or historical interest, the period in which the book was written, or any other information which might affect the author’s point of view. Knowing something about an author can often provide insight into the author’s perspective and reason for writing the book. However, include only such information as is pertinent to the author’s qualifications to write the book.
Paragraph 3: Thesis of the Book
The thesis is the underlying theme of the work; this is the contention with which the author tries to get the reader to accept. Oftentimes, thesis pronouncements may be found in the introduction, preface, foreword, and/or conclusion of book. However, the thesis may not be declared per se in some books. Nevertheless, the student can determine the thesis by
noting the particular interpretation of the book’s subject that the author presented. For example, if information is included in the book revealing how the author’s point of view differs from other accounts, this data provides an indication for the reviewer to ascertain the thesis of the book.
After identifying the thesis, the reviewer should comment on how the author attempted to support his/her thesis and evaluate the effectiveness of the author’s evidence. Refer to only the sections of the book which are pertinent to this discussion. Do not try to summarize the entire book, render a chapter-by-chapter description, provide a thumbnail sketch of the plot, or retell the story.
Paragraph 4: Methodology
In this section, the reviewer should analyze how the author presents his/her argument. You should comment on such points as the following: organization (chronological or topical); style (narrative/analytical); readability (“scholarly” or “popular” reader appeal); balance (author’s possible bias); internal consistency (contradictions detected in the book); research methods that the author utilized to write the book (primary/secondary sources indicated in footnotes and/or bibliography). Insure that balance is established in the review. Address both the weak and strong points of the work. The perfect book (perfectly bad, or perfectly good) has not been written.
Paragraph 5: Other Book Reviews
Conclude your review by providing what other reviewers have said about the book. Locate reviews of the book using a library resource such as Book Review Index. Book Review Index is not a journal; it is an index for locating journal articles and may be accessed using the SJC Online Library (General Research link). Use only historical journals for your reviews (Reviews from Amazon.com or other novice readers do not count). Many of the journal articles may be accessed using JSTOR link also found under General Research links. In some cases if the journal article cannot be found online, you will have to go to an academic library.
After locating the other reviews include the comments of at least one in your essay. You may either paraphrase or quote the reviewer. Cite the review using the following format: (Journal, volume #, date, page #). A citation would look something like this: (American Historical Review, 65, June 1975, 115.)
Paragraph 6: Conclusion
Provide any concluding remarks.
FORMAT:
1. Your book review must be composed in essay form. It should be arranged with a distinct introduction, body and conclusion, but should not utilize section or paragraph headings/numbers.
2. Book reviews must be typed (black ink), not less than three and one-half or more than four pages in length, with double spacing throughout and one and one-half inch margins. Use a font size of 12.
3. This should be a finished paper that exhibits proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Eliminate all typographical errors by retyping the page---do not make pen-and-ink or editing corrections.
4. To give an authoritative style to your work, do not write in first person (omit words such as I, me, my, etc.)
5. Avoid the repetition of words.
6. Avoid the use of contractions (ex. don’t, can’t, won’t, etc.)
7. Avoid purple prose (really creative writing).
8. Quoting: There are a few rules to follow when quoting from the book. 1.) The quote must be part of your sentence, not standing alone or in a block quote format. 2.) Cite the quote by placing the page number of the quoted text in parentheses at the end of the sentence. 3.) Use quotes sparingly---no more than one or two at the most.
9. No cover sheet is required. Place student name, course number, and date in top left-hand corner of the first page (single spaced). Place a bibliographical citation of the book (centered) as a title of the review. An example is offered below:
Name
Course #
Date
Paul D. Lack. The Texas Revolutionary Experience: A Political and Social History, 1835-1836. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 1992.
10. DO NOT use a Works Cites page. Cite the book reviews using the following format.At the end of the sentence or paragraph where the review is cited include the following information. (Journal, volume #, date, page #). A citation would look something like this: (American Historical Review, 65, June 1975, 115.)
11. Reviews should be submitted twice: once using the SafeAssign system found in the Evaluations section of this website and once to the instructor. E-mail the review as a .doc or .docx file attached to an e-mail. Your review will not be graded until it is submitted twice.
Excerpt From Essay:
Bibliography:

Both authors show their classical trained historical expertise when presenting both insightful and extremely well-researched arguments that, rather than a journalistic polemic, present facts that explore the manner in which big-business, especially in the personification of people like Roone Arledge, both expanded the idea of sports as a pastime and controlled the purse strings to the point that even teams seemed manipulated. Thematically, they show that the emphasis on money and national status may have turned such iconic games as the Olympics into "commercial extravaganzas financed by television and dominated by a show-business ethos" (pp. 209-10). Indeed, the authors' expertise in social history is shown by their analysis of the particular Catholic viewpoint from the early owners of the big football franchises who, until the late 1970s, limited their own franchise movements based on a particular moral and ethical template.

The book was received quite well in the fields of sporting history, social history, and American popular culture studies. One reviewer noted that the only serious limitation in the book was an almost complete lack of the significant changes the sporting world saw from 1960 on in the field of women's sports, feminist thought, and equal participation in the team sports (Adelman, Journal of Sport History, 17, Winter 1990, 390).

For the reader interested in more of an intellectual history of modern sports, the book is a perfect overall introduction. For the reader fascinated by the manner in which the intricacies of popular culture mimic larger cultural trends, the book is a fascinating insight into the way technology, business, and leisure studies merge into a single, unifying trend.

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: Synopsis of the book The Sunflower On The Possibilities and Limits of Forgiveness

  • Total Pages: 2
  • Words: 730
  • References:2
  • Citation Style: MLA
  • Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: Book for the Paper: Wiesenthal, Simon, The Sunflower: On the Possibilities and Limits of
Forgiveness, Schocken Books, 1998

1. The paper should be 3 ??" 5 pages long.
2. Section 1 ??" Introduction
This section includes a synopsis of the book and setting
3. Section 2 ??" This section is an analysis and explanation of Weisenthal’s actions
Include what he did or did not do and why. Explain the culture he was currently living in and how it
influenced his behavior
4. Section 3 ??" The commenter’s ??" pick 2 of the commentators and describe their reactions to
Weisenthal’s query and explain how their culture affected their thoughts on this matter.
5. Section 4 ??" Your thoughts
Describe your reactions to what you have written about and also what you think you should do and
what you would do if you were in this situation. Explain why and how your personal experience of
your culture affects this.
6. References
Excerpt From Essay:
References:


Wiesenthal, Simon, The Sunflower: On the Possibilities and Limits of Forgiveness, Schocken Books, 1998

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: A Nation Among Nations Book Review

  • Total Pages: 3
  • Words: 1037
  • Bibliography:0
  • Citation Style: Chicago
  • Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: Book Review
Due 3/6/12
Thomas Bender, A Nation Among Nations (2007), Ch. 2-3, p. 61-181
This review of the Bender text should be three pages. Writing this concisely will be
harder than you think.
The review should have an introduction and conclusion. An introductory paragraph that
introduces the author, the text, its subject and your opinion is necessary. A conclusion
paragraph is not necessary, but the essay must be wrapped up at the end. This is done by
summing up your argument and creating symmetry with your opening. Remember you
only have three pages, so be concise.
When reviewing this text you must answer these essential questions in an opening
introductory paragraph:
1.Who is Bender? What is his background? Is he qualified to write this?
2.Who is his intended audience?
3. Does he see the audience as friendly, hostile, or neutral? If neutral, is he trying to
convince them of something?
4.What is Bender’s intention? Is the text celebratory or polemical? Why did he write it?
5. How is the argument structured? Does the second chapter logically follow the first?
6. Does the work appeal to logic or emotion?
When you read the book, take notes on things that strike you. At the end of the reading if
you find themes in your notes, you should write about them. Bring your background and
interests to the table. For example, if you feel like Bender should have been clearer about
certain things, say so. If he missed an opportunity, feel free to take him to task. If one part
of his analysis struck you, feel free to hone in on it. You should consider doing a small
amount of outside research into the databases I mentioned during our first class
(Academic Search Premier, JSTOR, and Project MUSE). Be sure to cite any article you
take information from with a footnote. See the Chicago Manual of Style on the Library’s
list of databases for proper citations.
You should write a one-page summary of the two chapters, using very broad sweeps.
Afterward, you should write a one-page to one-and-a-half page critique of the chapters.
This is supposed to be your analysis of the text that shows your thinking. You can like or
hate the essays, but back up your reasoning with examples from the text. You MUST use
examples in this section to get all the points. Think of it like this: if your mother was in
the bookstore and could not decide to buy this book or not, what would you say to stop
her or get her to buy it?One suggestion would be to find three points upon which to these analysis middle
paragraphs. If you write three paragraphs of analysis that means you should find nine
points to make total and then give examples to back up those points.
You will be graded on your comments and your use of evidence to back them up, but also
on your use of active verbs and the formal structure of your essay.
You will lose 10% from your grade if you use any contractions. This is must be
written in a formal style.


Please let me know ASAP if you don't have the assigned chapter from page 61-181 in chapter 2-3
Excerpt From Essay:
Bibliography:

American history was shaped by its geographical position and also by the political context of the time. U.S. history is no linear story of progress nor is it self-contained. We may like to think ourselves unique, but, as Bender shows "the beginnings [and, indeed, the entire history] of the United States… are the product & #8230; of many histories, several of them global in scope." (60).

Source

Bender, T. (2006). A nation among nations. New York: Hill & Wang.

Order Custom Essay On This Topic
Request A Custom Essay On This Topic Request A Custom Essay
Testimonials:
“I really do appreciate HelpMyEssay.com. I'm not a good writer and the service really gets me going in the right direction. The staff gets back to me quickly with any concerns that I might have and they are always on time.’’ Tiffany R
“I have had all positive experiences with HelpMyEssay.com. I will recommend your service to everyone I know. Thank you!’’ Charlotte H
“I am finished with school thanks to HelpMyEssay.com. They really did help me graduate college.’’ Bill K