Alchemist Essays and Research Papers

Instructions for Alchemist College Essay Examples

Title: The Alchemist compared to Tuck Everlasting

  • Total Pages: 4
  • Words: 1156
  • Bibliography:4
  • Citation Style: APA
  • Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: I will send the specific guidelines for the research paper. IThere is a prompt and to research the legends of the Elixir of Life and the Philosophers Stone as they relate to the novels The Alchemist(Paulo Coelho) and Tuck Everlasting. Please refer to the guidelines and to the rubric. There are some very specific rules to this paper as well as it gets turned into turnitin.com Please be very careful with resources and sourcing because of this as well. Please ask as many questions you need to if you are at all not sure about what to do. I am requesting Denise Day.
There are faxes for this order.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: Literary Period Essay

  • Total Pages: 5
  • Words: 1473
  • Sources:3
  • Citation Style: MLA
  • Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: I will be forwarding the instructions on the essay after the order is placed. The book that my son wants to use is the Alchemist therefore the time period of the author I believe would be the Twentieth Century. Please keep the language in the essay fairly simple. My son's writing skills are not real strong.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: I answers questions Each answer a page a half a short introduction conclusion question start a page put continue half page left previous question The questions follow 1 Why objectivity readers a prerequisite reading novels 2 monster a formal device shelley's Frankensten 3 How convince a hater a lover 4 stop horror Marlowe conrad's heart Darkness 5 Pamela In Richardson's Pamela metaphor binary opposition versus 6 Discuss tme a major thematic device Of Love Demons 7 How shepherdess teach Santiago Alchemist love page answere

  • Total Pages: 10
  • Words: 2652
  • References:0
  • Citation Style: APA
  • Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: I need answers for the following questions. Each answer should be be around a page and a half. with a very short introduction and conclusion for each one. the following question shouldn't start in a new page put rather continue in the half page left of the previous question.
The questions are as follow:
1) Why should the objectivity of readers be a prerequisite for reading novels?
2) why is the monster a formal device in shelley's Frankensten?
3) How to convince a novel-hater to be a novel-lover?
4) what is the non-stop horror for Marlowe, in conrad's heart of Darkness?
5) why does Pamela , In Richardson's Pamela, use the metaphor "self and the other' instead of the binary opposition 'self versus the other'?
6) Discuss 'tme' as a major thematic device in 'Of Love and other Demons'
7) How does shepherdess teach Santiago, for "the Alchemist", self-love? one page for this answere.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: Copletion for Order ID 36642 Drug Legalization

  • Total Pages: 2
  • Words: 592
  • Works Cited:0
  • Citation Style: MLA
  • Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: Attention
This order is completion for Drug Legalization, Order ID 36642 with Writer "FreelanceWriter"

Please complete these additional two pages with Final conclusion of Writer's point of view, also giving strong Supporting Ideas .
Most of these page should focus on Writer's personal point of view, it may also contain additinal pro and cons towards the topic.( the conclusion and ideas needs to be deeper).

I have also attached the previous order. for any other question please contact me before the due time.


LEGALIZATION OF RECREATIONAL DRUG USE


In 1920 the sale and consumption of alcohol was criminalized across the United

States pursuant to the 18th Amendment. Consumer demand nevertheless presented a ripe

opportunity for criminal usurpation of the illicit production and distribution of alcohol.

Consequently, by the time Prohibition was subsequently repealed by the 21st Amendment

in 1933, the criminal enterprises that it had spawned were so firmly entrenched into the

landscape of the American economy that most of them still retain considerable power even

today (Dershowitz, 2002).

Modern proponents of decriminalizing illicit drugs point to the complete failure of

Prohibition to achieve its goals, suggesting that contemporary laws criminalizing

recreational drugs such as marijuana, heroin and cocaine are as ineffective as was the 18th

Amendment, and more harmful to society than the aggregate of all the actual harm caused

by the unrestricted use of recreational drugs.

Predictably, those opposed to decriminalization fear the explosion of drug

addiction and drug related crime that would follow as a consequence of their unrestricted

use. They point to the well established link between drug abuse, juvenile delinquency and

petty crimes necessitated by expensive, addictive narcotics (Brecher, 1972).

Those opposed to decriminalization of recreational drugs consider the current

level of illegal drug abuse and criminal activities related thereto to represent merely

the very tip of the iceberg of an insurmountable epidemic of drug use currently kept in

relative check only by strict penal laws that operate as a deterrent to wider abuse.

In their view, decriminalizing recreational drugs would dramatically increase the

incidence of narcotics addiction and the crimes associated with the realities of a

massive influx of unemployed drug addicts desperate to pay for their ever increasing


habits by any means possible.

Proponents of decriminalization reject the suggestion that drug use and abuse

would necessarily increase substantially in the absence of penal laws criminalizing their

use. According to their view, the epidemic of narcotics-related crime is already at its

peak, because it results directly from the criminal elements currently responsible for its

importation, trade and sale. Furthermore, they maintain that contemporary laws

prohibiting recreational narcotics use have created the same situation that prevailed under

Prohibition by creating a black market which has been filled by ruthless criminal

Elements (Brecher, 1972).

Similarly, they suggest that the inflated cost of illicit drugs is to blame for the

link between drug abuse and petty crime, because the standard principles of black

market economics dictate a much higher price for drugs that are dramatically more

expensive than they would be under legislation decriminalizing their sale and use.

Likewise, they point to situations such as in New York, where the so-called ?Rockefeller

Laws? have resulted in the mandatory incarceration of scores of citizens whose only

crimes were entirely victimless, while violent and dangerous offenders pass through a

revolving door, overcrowded criminal justice system (Syracuse Post-Standard).

Upon considering the merits of the respective positions concerning the

decriminalization of illicit narcotics, it appears that the views espoused by proponents of

decriminalization are more consistent with the overall good of society on multiple levels.

First, it is simply irreconcilable, from a logical perspective, that cigarettes and

other tobacco products are sold completely legally, while private use and the mere

possession of marijuana and any other agent containing THC such as hashish are severely

penalized in many states. Opponents of decriminalization believe that government owes a

duty of paternalistic protection of its citizens, but critics point out that even the most well

motivated paternalistic laws must reflect a consistency in their application and effect

(Taylor, 1982). Meanwhile, cigarettes account for more deaths in this country than all

drugs, alcoholism, violent crime and vehicular accidents, combined (Brecher, 1972).

Second, alcohol abuse so closely parallels the effects of drug abuse that it is

equally unjustifiable to permit alcohol sale and consumption to account for tremendous

corporate revenue while criminalizing private use of narcotics altogether. Naturally, even

under a liberal analysis, personal rights and freedoms end wherever they conflict with the

well being and safety of others. Accordingly, proponents of repealing drug laws suggest

that laws addressing the criminal operation of motor vehicles and dangerous equipment

while under the influence of alcohol should be the extent of penal control of narcotics.

Third, rather than resulting in increased criminality, legalization of private

narcotics possession and use would actually decrease criminality associated with drug use,

because current legislation creates criminals, by punishing otherwise lawful citizens

whose only contact with the criminal justice system arises from their private, victimless

crime. Furthermore, redirecting public monies currently funding the ?War on Drugs? to

appropriate legislation and taxation modeled after tobacco legislation would benefit

society, both by generating taxes and more importantly, by dramatically lowering prices,

which are currently grossly inflated by the very black market economics that it creates.

Finally, the improved quality of government-regulated narcotics would probably

eliminate medical emergencies currently caused by adulterated, impure product, as well as

eliminate the widespread transmission of HIV via shared needles. In this regard, modern

narcotics prohibitions precisely parallel the horrible cost in lives lost to unscrupulous use

of poisonous alcohols (and formaldehydes) instead of ethanol during Prohibition. Rather

than learn from past mistakes, opponents of decriminalization are poised to repeat them.
REFERENCES



Brecher, E.M. (1972) Licit and Illicit Drugs: The Consumers Union Report.
Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

Dershowitz, A. (2002) Shouting Fire: Civil Liberties in a Turbulent Age
New York: Little Brown & Co.

Goldman, B., Klatz, R. (1992) Death in the Locker Room II:Drugs & Sports
Tucson: The Body Press

Gottlieb, A. (1976) The Pleasures of Cocaine.
Manhattan Beach, CA: Twentieth Century Alchemist

Let Judges Be Judges: Mandatory Sentencing Laws Deny Judicial Branch's
Discretion; Syracuse Post-Standard. Jul 10/03

Taylor, R. (1982) Freedom, Anarchy and the Law.
Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books

[ Order Custom Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Order Custom Essay On This Topic
Request A Custom Essay On This Topic Request A Custom Essay
Testimonials:
“I really do appreciate HelpMyEssay.com. I'm not a good writer and the service really gets me going in the right direction. The staff gets back to me quickly with any concerns that I might have and they are always on time.’’ Tiffany R
“I have had all positive experiences with HelpMyEssay.com. I will recommend your service to everyone I know. Thank you!’’ Charlotte H
“I am finished with school thanks to HelpMyEssay.com. They really did help me graduate college.’’ Bill K