Total Pages: 8 Words: 2512 References: 10 Citation Style: APA Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: I have uploaded a folder to DROP BOX called "Lou Lou" containing the relevant lecture notes and literature. Empirical evidence from other sources other than the readings will be necessary for the essay.
IN RECORDING I was to demonstrate:
active listening, empathy, appropriate assertiveness, willingness to reach a win/win resolution, collaborative and cooperative language, ability to manage your emotions, appropriate body language, any other relevant conflict management skills appropriate to the situation
1. Active listening demonstrated
2. Empathy demonstrated
3. Appropriate assertiveness demonstrated
4. Willingness to reach a win/win resolution evident
5. Collaborative and cooperative language demonstrated
6. Ability to manage emotions evident
7. Appropriate body language demonstrated
8. Other relevant conflict management skills appropriate to the context demonstrated
Write a reflective essay critiquing your practice session. Discuss four key conflict management skills you used or attempted to use.
Your essay is to include:
a brief factual overview of the conflict scenario, including the conflict type
the use of terminology and concepts for managing and resolving conflict
identification of the four conflict management skills you used
evaluation of your application of each of the four skills (how well you applied the skills) including verbatim examples (at a minimum one per paragraph)
suggestions for improvement in your application of the four skills, including verbatim examples of what you could have said ( at minimum one per paragraph)
identification of other strategies or skills you could have used to negotiate a positive outcome
reference to relevant literature, linking your ideas to theory discussed in the unit
1. Factual overview of the conflict provided and type correctly identified
2. Four conflict management skills used in the session identified correctly, including verbatim examples
3. Application of the four skills critiqued and evaluated
4. Appropriate suggestions made for improvement in use of relevant skills and verbatim examples provided
5. Evidence of familiarity with relevant literature and theory
6. Evidence of integration of theory and practice
7. Appropriate introduction provided that clearly articulates the topic
8. Main ideas clearly and logically presented
9. Appropriate conclusion provided that summarises the key findings/ideas
Excerpt From Essay:
Essay Instructions: Virtual Workplace: Out of the Office Reply and Listening Skills: Yeah Whatever Video
1) Watch the 2 video files - Virtual Workplace: Out of the Office Reply and the Listening Skills: Yeah Whatever videos
2) Write a paper of 1,000-1,250 words, in which you respond to the following questions:
a) How effective is the communication between Pilar and Miguel in the first part of the Listening Skills video? Did this change in the second part of the video? How does this compare to the communication between Angela and Ralph during the first and second meetings in the Virtual Workplace video?
b) What is active listening? What types of noise prevented Miguel from listening actively in the first part of the video? How is his listening different in the second part of the video?
c) Use reference material provided to describes two main types of conflict. What type of conflict is occurring between Pilar and Miguel? How is this similar/different from that between Angel and Ralph?
d) What direct and indirect conflict management approach are Pilar (in the Listening Skills video) and Ralph (in the Virtual Workplace video) using? Which of these managers is most effective and why?
e) There are two types of negotiation: integrative and distributive. Which do you see occurring in each video? Review the criteria of effective negotiations and determine whether the final decision in each of these videos is effective or not.
3) Use APA format
4) Include a total of 4 credible sources ( 1 source is already included)
Schermerhorn, J. R. (2011). Management and organization behavior. (1ed.). Danvers, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
I will have to use "YouSendit" service to get these video files to you (they are about 9 min each - avi files) . Please provide me an email address so I can send video files.
There are faxes for this order.
Excerpt From Essay:
Essay Instructions: The purpose of the COM 425 Final Paper is to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your knowledge of the organizational communication concepts and skills that you have learned throughout this course.
Imagine that you are proposing a new communication structure for an organization. Write a formal proposal in which you discuss at least five concepts that you feel are most important for successful communication within an organizational setting. Address why these concepts are necessary for successful communication and how best to implement them within an organization.
Examples of concepts that you may choose to use are: active listening, organizational culture, conflict resolution, key principles of human communication, leadership strategies, formal and informal communication, etc.
Your information for this paper should not be based on your own opinions; you must back up your information with research. The research may include readings from this course or from outside sources. In total, your paper must include at least five (5) sources with at least two (2) from ProQuest, which can be found in the Ashford Online Library. This is a formal paper and should include proper grammar, complete sentences, appropriate paragraphs, and correct citations/references in proper APA style. Along with explaining the communication concepts and including the research, you can also use your personal experiences to explain the research that you are presenting in your paper.
NOTE: A full sentence outline of this assignment will be submitted during Week Three. You will receive feedback on your outline so that you can make improvements before you submit your final paper in Week Five.
The paper must be eight to ten pages in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least five scholarly resources (two of which must be found in the Ashford Online Library) other than the textbook to support your claims and subclaims. Cite your resources in text and on the reference page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on you?re the left navigation toolbar.
I have attached the outline and two of the refences listed. Please let me know if you need more.
Excerpt From Essay:
Essay Instructions: Critical Essays
Instructions: Write one essay (of approximately 500-1000 words each) for each of the following passages, summarizing and evaluating each passage. Be sure to use the appropriate criteria in your evaluation, depending on what kinds of argument or theory is being presented. NOTE: Both passages from J. Cederblom and D. W. Paulsen, Critical Reasoning, 5th edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsroth, 2001
Truth about ?assistance?
There are many good reasons respected groups oppose suicide. Here are some of them.
By Wesley J. Smith
To paraphrase the old musical classic, assisted-suicide advocates are great pretenders. They promise that it will be restricted ?as a last resort? to mentally competent, terminally ill people. They argue that the killing will be facilitated only by super careful Marcus Welby clones They promise that the entire practice will be strictly controlled and, above all, compassionate. Balderdash. Let?s open our eyes to the truth.
Assisted suicide is not about terminal illness.
Jack Kevorkian epitomizes what actual assisted-suicide practice would look like. Approximately 20% of his subjects (his term) have been terminally ill. The largest category of people he has helped to die were disabled. Three had no physical illness on autopsy. That?s not all. The 9th Circuit Count of Appeals decision, now before the Supreme Court, specifically held that the disabled ?will, along with non-impaired individuals, be beneficiaries? of legalized assisted suicide.
Moreover, the court ruled that ?a decision by a duly appointed surrogate decision maker is, for all legal purposes, the decision of the patient himself.? This means that if upheld, it would allow the permissible, nonvoluntary killing of those who are legally incompetent, which could include Alzheimer?s patients, mentally retarded people and, perhaps, children.
It is not about compassion.
Studies show that suicidal people who are dying or disabled are no different from those who want to die because of, say, a lost business or divorce. Almost all are clinically depressed.
We will interfere with the jilted lover?s ?right to die,? by force if necessary. Yet we are supposed to allow doctors to assist the suicides of persons with multiple sclerosis or cancer when next week or next month they might regain the desire to live.
That isn?t compassion; it is the ultimate abandonment.
Follow the money:
Headlines announce almost daily the pressure that for-profit HMOs place on doctors to reduce the cost of health care.
Plug legalized assisted suicide, which is far cheaper than long-term care, into the HMO equation.
Imagine ?choosing? assisted suicide because your HMO denied you adequate access to specialists in pain control or appropriate treatment for depression. It could happen.
Or think how you would feel if an HMO doctor recommended suicide as the best ?treatment? for your spouse, and you knew that the doctor could be fired or lose bonus income for providing your beloved with too much care but would be financially untouched for assisting in his or her suicide.
These are just a few of the many reasons the American Medical Association, the Hospice Nurses Association and the Clinton administration, among many diverse others, have filed briefs in the Supreme Court against legalizing assisted suicide.
It?s time to stop pretending, open our eyes, and see assisted suicide for what it really would be: a moral and ethical catastrophe.
The Secret to a Happy Marriage? Men Giving In
The Los Angeles Times
Husbands, forget all that psychobabble about active listening and validation.
If you want your marriage to last for a long time, the newest advice from psychologists is quite simple: Just do what your wife says. Go ahead, give in to her.
Active listening, in which one partner paraphrases the other partner?s concerns??So what I hear you say is?? ?is unnatural and requires too much of people in the midst of emotional conflict, says psychologist John Gottman of the University of Washington. ?Asking that of couples is like requiring emotional gymnastics,? he said.
Gottman and his colleagues studied 130 newlywed couples for six years in an effort to find ways to predict both marital success and failure.
Couples who used such techniques were no more likely to stay together than couples who did not, they report in the Journal of Marriage and Family, which is published by the National Council on Family Relations.
?We need to convey how shocked and surprised we were by these results for the active listening model,? the team said in the article. In fact, Gottman and his colleagues have long recommended active listening to couples seeking counseling and had expected that its use would be a predictor of success in marriages.
That it was not a predictor, he said, suggests that its widespread use in marital counseling should be abandoned.
The marriages that did work well all had one thing in common?the husband was willing to give in to the wife.
?We found that only those newlywed men who are accepting of influence from their wives are ending up in happy, stable marriages,? Gottman said. The autocrats who failed to listen to their wives? complaints, greeting them with stonewalling, contempt and belligerence were doomed from the beginning, they found.
But the study did not let wives completely off the hook. Women who couched their complaints in a gentle, soothing perhaps even humorous approach to the husband were more likely to have happy marriages than those who were more belligerent. ?That type of (belligerent) response is even more exaggerated in violent marriages,? he said.
The fact that happily married couples do not normally use active listening is not a surprise, according to psychologist Howard Markman of the University of Denver, author of the 1994 book Fighting for your Marriage. ?We?ve found that in our own studies,? he said.
In fact, he says that Gottman is setting up a ?straw man? in the study of active listening and validation, which is another form of recognizing the legitimacy of a spouse?s opinions. ?When active listening is taught, it is not because happy couples use it,? Markman said. ?We use it to help couples disrupt the negative patterns that predict divorce.?
Gottman said he is ?very sympathetic? to that idea. ?If you can genuinely listen and be empathetic when you are the target of the complaint, that can be very powerful,? he said. But for the average person, he said, ?it is just too hard. The average person meets anger with anger.?
The differences between Gottman and Markman are typical of the turmoil in the filed of marital counseling. A 1993 report said that marital therapy has a relapse rate so high ?that the entire enterprise may be in a state of crisis.? A recent Consumer Reports study indicated that people who underwent such therapy were the least satisfied among people who have undergone any form of psychotherapy.
Gottman?s study was designed to identify the factors that naturally contribute to a successful marriage, so those might be brought into play in therapy, thereby making it more successful.
?If you want to change marriages,? he said, ?you have to talk about the ?emotionally intelligent? husband. Some men are really good at accepting a wife?s influence, at finding something reasonable in a partner?s complaint to agree with.? That group represents perhaps a third of all men, he said.
Excerpt From Essay:
I really do appreciate HelpMyEssay.com. I'm not a good writer and the service really gets me going in the right direction. The staff gets back to me quickly with any concerns that I might have and they are always on time.
I have had all positive experiences with HelpMyEssay.com. I will recommend your service to everyone I know. Thank you!
I am finished with school thanks to HelpMyEssay.com. They really did help me graduate college..