Essay Instructions: Paper set up: Just a research paper - doesn't need a conclusion as it is not an essay
Must include a reference list
Set out in APA format
Only use journal articles or articles from books
Research paper description:
This brief piece of research aims to investigate the psychological processes that are involved in ?intergroup contact?, that is, during face-to-face interactions between people from different social groups. Specifically, we wanted to investigate whether the valence and the type of affect that people experience during intergroup contact impact on the degree to which the contact partners are aware of their respective group memberships (i.e., category salience) and on the attitudes they hold about each other?s group. The main research should aim to investigate what previous research and psychological experiments have shown when looking at category salience during intergroup contact. Specifically to assess the effects that the affect (i.e., emotions) experienced during intergroup contact exert on the salience of the social category dimensions and outgroup prejudice, research should also back up the statements that Negative Incidental Affect Decreases Category Salience and Prejudice, and that Negative Integral Affect Increases Category Salience and Prejudice.
Some references that might be helpful, you don?t need to use them ? but they answer some of the areas that should be covered.
Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In Zanna, M. P (Ed), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255-343). San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier. Note: This is an extensive background reading with a comprehensive review of the evidence currently available for Hewstone and Brown?s (1986) intergroup model of contact and the pivotal role of category salience during contact experiences. Treat it as a background source.
Greenland, K., & Brown, R. (1999). Categorization and intergroup anxiety in contact between British and Japanese nationals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 503-521. Note: This is an empirical paper looking at the relationship between one type of integral affect?intergroup anxiety?and category salience?here called ?intergroup categorization?. This research uses a longitudinal design, thus, allowing firmer conclusions about the relationship between affect/quality of contact and category salience.
Mackie, D. M., Queller, S., Stroessner, S. J., Hamilton, D. L. (1996). Making stereotypes better or worse: Multiple roles for positive affect in group impressions. In Sorrentino, R. M & Higgins, E. T. (Eds), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3: The interpersonal context. (pp. 371-396). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Note: This book chapter provides an overview of evidence on the effects of incidental affect on intergroup judgments.
Wilder, D. A., & Simon, A. F. (1996). Incidental and integral affect as triggers of stereotyping. In Sorrentino, R. M & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3: The interpersonal context. (pp. 397-419).. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Note: This book chapter discusses similarities ad differences in the effects of incidental and integral affect on intergroup judgments and considers implications of these differences for intergroup contact.
Wilder, D., & Simon, A. F. (2001). Affect as a Cause of Intergroup Bias. In Brown, R. & Gaertner, S. L. (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 153-172). Malden, MA : Blackwell Publishers. Note: This book chapter identifies major psychological explanations of the effects of affect on intergroup judgments.