Search Our Essay Database

University Essays and Research Papers

Instructions for University College Essay Examples

Essay Instructions: University of Phoenix. SOC/315 week 4

Search the Internet to find at least one news item about this lawsuit, preferably from a news source in the state in which the incident occurred.
Write a 1,050- to 1,200- word paper that includes the following:

A description of the compliance issue that led to the lawsuit and its ramifications for the organization.
A brief summary of the functions of the EEOC in one paragraph.
The EEOC?s role in this lawsuit.
Whether or not this lawsuit promotes social change; justify your reasoning
A comparison of the EEOC press release to the news item. What accounts for the differences?
Strategies you would implement, if you were a senior manager of this company, to ensure future compliance and inclusion in the multicultural workplace.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Excerpt From Essay:

Title: mooting assessment problem solving

Total Pages: 4 Words: 1469 References: 0 Citation Style: MLA Document Type: Research Paper

Essay Instructions: University of the East of England v Edwards
In the Court of Appeal

Ms Edwards is a student at the University of the East of England. She lives in halls of residence, and pays £140 per week for her accommodation, £20 a week less than she would pay for the equivalent private rental property in her area. Her tenancy agreement includes the following terms:
(a) Students are prohibited from holding parties in the accommodation without the prior permission of the University;
(b) Collective liability will be imposed upon students for damage when the individual(s) responsible cannot be identified; each student will pay an equal proportion in respect of any such damage;
(c) The University accepts no liability in negligence for property damage suffered by students on University premises.

In order to raise money to pay for a holiday, Ms Edwards wants to hold a themed party in her university accommodation, and to charge each guest a £10 admission fee. She does not want to seek the permission of the University for this party, since she believes that her plan to charge an entrance fee, and the theme, ‘music inspired by LSD’, would be unacceptable to it and she thinks that term (a) is ‘unfair’ and therefore contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Ms Edwards also thinks that term (c) unfair because it is ‘unreasonable’ and therefore contrary to s.2(2) of the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977. This term concerns her because her MP3 player has been broken in her halls of residence by the University’s negligence.

The trial judge accepts Ms Edwards’ argument, holding:
SENIOR
(1) That term (a), considered in the light of term (b), is unfair under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, and therefore not binding on her;
JUNIOR
And
(2) That term (c) is unreasonable under UCTA. The University is appealing against both findings.

The University is appealing against both findings.

Bibliography format / citation style: Footnote

This is a case given for a mooting assessment (UK). My position in the mooting assessment is JUNIOR APPELLANT.
Junior Apellant appeals against the decision(s) of the lower court and argues that the appeal should be allowed. According to the given case, you should argue AGAINST the statement that the term (c ) is unreasonable under UCTA. You are only concerned with the second argument. Please read the full statute (the unfair contract terms act(UCTA) 1977 ) before putting your arguments. Please try to rebut the possible counter arguments and be persuasive.
You can refer to a total of 3 authorities (cases, statutes, secondary sources).Can you please support the arguments with relevant cases and scholar opinions. Thanks in advance.

Excerpt From Essay:

Title: mooting assessment problem solving

Total Pages: 4 Words: 1440 Works Cited: 0 Citation Style: APA Document Type: Essay

Essay Instructions: University of the East of England v Edwards
In the Court of Appeal

Ms Edwards is a student at the University of the East of England. She lives in halls of residence, and pays £140 per week for her accommodation, £20 a week less than she would pay for the equivalent private rental property in her area. Her tenancy agreement includes the following terms:
(a) Students are prohibited from holding parties in the accommodation without the prior permission of the University;
(b) Collective liability will be imposed upon students for damage when the individual(s) responsible cannot be identified; each student will pay an equal proportion in respect of any such damage;
(c) The University accepts no liability in negligence for property damage suffered by students on University premises.

In order to raise money to pay for a holiday, Ms Edwards wants to hold a themed party in her university accommodation, and to charge each guest a £10 admission fee. She does not want to seek the permission of the University for this party, since she believes that her plan to charge an entrance fee, and the theme, ‘music inspired by LSD’, would be unacceptable to it and she thinks that term (a) is ‘unfair’ and therefore contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Ms Edwards also thinks that term (c) unfair because it is ‘unreasonable’ and therefore contrary to s.2(2) of the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977. This term concerns her because her MP3 player has been broken in her halls of residence by the University’s negligence.

The trial judge accepts Ms Edwards’ argument, holding:
SENIOR
(1) That term (a), considered in the light of term (b), is unfair under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, and therefore not binding on her;
JUNIOR
And
(2) That term (c) is unreasonable under UCTA. The University is appealing against both findings.

The University is appealing against both findings.

DESCRIPTION:
Bibliography format / citation style : Footnote

This is a case given for a mooting assessment (UK). My position in the mooting assessment is JUNIOR APPELLANT.
Junior Apellant appeals against the decision(s) of the lower court and argues that the appeal should be allowed. According to the given case, you should argue AGAINST the statement that the term (c ) is unreasonable under UCTA. You are only concerned with the second argument. Please read the full statute (the unfair contract terms act(UCTA) 1977 ) before putting your arguments. Please try to rebut the possible counter arguments and be persuasive.
You can refer to a total of 3 authorities (cases, statutes, secondary sources) Thanks in advance.

Excerpt From Essay:

Essay Instructions: UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX (UOP) COMM 315 Myplace: The Place for Diversity Multimedia Analysis

Resource: Myplace: The Place for Diversity multimedia

Review the Myplace: The Place for Diversity multimedia located on your student website.

Write a 750- to 1,050-word analysis defining diversity and identifying its different visible and hidden dimensions.



? Cite three specific examples from the individuals presented in the multimedia.

? Describe the various characteristics that encompass components of diversity, not just race or gender.

? Analyze your tendency to judge people based on superficial characteristics.



Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines

Excerpt From Essay:

Request A Custom Essay On This Topic

Testimonials

I really do appreciate HelpMyEssay.com. I'm not a good writer and the service really gets me going in the right direction. The staff gets back to me quickly with any concerns that I might have and they are always on time.

Tiffany R

I have had all positive experiences with HelpMyEssay.com. I will recommend your service to everyone I know. Thank you!

Charlotte H

I am finished with school thanks to HelpMyEssay.com. They really did help me graduate college..

Bill K