Search Our Essay Database

Essay Instructions: Can you use qutoes and write the paper neither too hard nor too simple. I need specifically peer reviewed second resource about the theme christianity to anlayze and interpret with the book "The Stranger" by Alberts Camus. need to have a thesis statement combination of the second resource and the book about christianity and need to support the ideas by referencing from the book and resource.

Essay Instructions: For this essay I would like you to focus on an encounter with or representation of a Stranger in Wuthering Heights by Emily Bronte. I want you to select a specific scene or passage relating to the Stranger in this text and perform a close reading of it. Analyze, for example, word choice or use of imagery or metaphor or characterization.

I want you to come up with a strong thesis statement! It’s most important that you articulate a strong thesis at the end of your introduction and then use the body paragraphs ??" few as they will be ??" to support that thesis. Strive to illuminate the text, and to teach something new about it.

Don’t forget to quote your text in the body of the essay. You’ll have to make some judicious choices about what ??" and how much ??" you quote. This essay should most likely concentrate on a very specific part of the text ??" a short passage. However, most of the text of this essay should be yours and not Bronte’s.

The essay has to be 3 pages long. You should distill your argument into an economical package, and every sentence must count.

Essay Instructions: Topic: "How is Camus’ The Stranger an existentialist novel? What are the qualities of character and elements of narrative that suggest existentialist themes?"

Please use atleast 6 examples of existentialism from the novel "The Stranger," using quotes. Do not worry about introduction as I am more concerned about the body. Please define or explain existentialism and how it relates to the story.

Essay Instructions: Topic: What, according to Sartre, is being-for-oneself, and what is being-for-others? What is the relation between them and differences between them? What can understanding the relevant features of being-for-others generally, its relation to being-for-oneself, and Meursault?s relationship to his own being-for-others more particularly, explain about the novel The Stranger?
Here are some questions about the novel to consider in coming up with a thesis:
? How does Meursault?s relationship to his being-for-others compares to the ordinary situation? Does it change over the course of the novel?
? Why does Meursault kill the Arab?
? Why does he answer only that it was ?because of the sun??
? Why is he sentenced to death?despite the fact that at first the lawyer says he ?had no doubts we?d win? (64)?
? Why is the second half of the novel so jarring with respect to the first?
? What is the significance of the defense lawyer speaking in the first person?
? What is the significance of the newspaper story about the traveller?
? Why does the book end with Meursault wishing to be greeted ?with cries of hate??

Recommended approach: Provide a careful explanation of Sartre?s understanding of being-for-others, its difference from being-for-oneself, and its essential features.
Consider in what ways Meursault?s relationship to his being-for-others, the difference between being-for-oneself and being-for-others, and the crucial features of being-for-others outlined by Sartre, could help explain elements of the text (what happens, what Meursault experiences, how the text is written or constructed, the difference in style and feel between parts one and two, and the difference between Meursault?s versus the lawyers? accounts of his crime, etc.). Formulate a unified thesis about the role the difference between being-for-oneself and being-for-others plays in the novel, and then use the details from Sartre and Camus you have gathered above to support your thesis.

Tips:
Write the paper as if you were explaining Sartre?s views as clearly as possible to someone who is not in the class. Be sure to explain clearly whatever Sartrean or other technical terminology you use. Cite all sources, including Sartre?s works, by page number. (If you decide to use any sources other than Sartre, McCulloch and Camus?which is not necessary?attach a bibliography.) Remember that you are doing literary interpretation as well as philosophical exposition here. Justify your interpretation in detail by reference to specific features of and details in the story, and connect these up with the specifics of Sartre?s theory in Being and Nothingness.