Essay Instructions: Research Proposal (25%):
You will write a proposal on a stratification and inequality topic of your choice. You can choose a topic based on lecture notes, the Dennis Gilbert textbook, or journal articles used in this course.
The purpose of a research proposal is to share a topic and corresponding research question of interest; and to share ideas on how to conduct such research. The difference between a research proposal and a research paper is that the research is not actually conducted in a research proposal. Therefore, there will be no actual data or findings from which the proposed study limitations and implications for future research will be based.
Instructions:
1. You will choose a stratification topic and write a 7-10 page research proposal.
2. The proposal will consist of the following:
a. Research question(s)
b. Thorough literature review of peer-reviewed journal articles and books
c. Proposed research methods
d. Proposed limitations
e. Theoretical conclusions
f. Proposed implications for future research
3. The Dennis Gilbert textbook cannot be used for the literature review except for the journal articles and books that Gilbert cites. The original journal articles and books must be found, read, and cited for the literature review.
4. Journal articles used for this course can be used for the literature review.
Format:
Paragraph format with no bullet points, 12 font Times New Roman, ASA-style works cited/bibliography.
ASA (American Sociological Association) link: http://www.asanet.org/Quick%20Style%20Guide.pdf
A research proposal is proposed research that you will not actually conduct for this course. Most research projects began as proposed research and therefore research proposals.
Please work on this research proposal bit-by-bit to give yourself enough time to find a stratification topic that interests you, to research the topic, and to propose your own research. Please give yourself enough time to thoroughly write, proofread, and edit your research proposal. Please remain scholarly in your research and writing. Avoid using dramatic, unrealistic, and unscholarly language. The following is an outline to add to the syllabus guidelines.
1. (Optional) An abstract provides a 150-300 word summary of your proposed research project to include your research question, study relevance, methods, and proposed findings. See some of the journal articles for examples of abstracts. This is optional for the research proposal. However, abstracts and annotated bibliographies are good exercises for conducting research and reading/studying for your classes.
2. Statement of the problem (and research question) is an introduction to the background, context, and relevance of your project. Explain what your proposed research will contribute to the existing literature, in terms of theory and methods, and/or to social policy. Will it address an issue, introduce a new approach to an issue, or fill a void in the literature? What are the implications for future scholars/researchers and/or social policy?
3. Review of the literature: Clarifies the theoretical and empirical traditions that shape and motivate the research. Examines contemporary work on the theory and research; historical work on the theory and research; and contemporary work on empirical issues and research questions that pertain to your topic. Your literature review combines the historical context of the issue with previous research, limitations, and opportunities for future research.
4. Research Design (examples of which are on Moodle): What assumptions are implicit in the research design that you chose? How will you conduct the research? Will this be quantitative or qualitative? Where and when will you conduct the research? What is your proposed methodological approach? Why did you choose this methodological approach? What kinds of data will be hypothetically gathered with this methodological approach? What variables and measurements will hypothetically be used? What do you plan to do with this data once collected?
5. Results (you will not have actual results): You will write about what you expect to find. What are the limitations of your proposed research? Are there resources that are hypothetically unavailable to you as a researcher? Anticipate the potential issues good scholars could hypothetically raise in their critiques of your research. How will you know whether your findings support or refute your assumptions? What would it mean if you did not find what you expect to find? What will it mean, in terms of theory and research, if you are wrong?
6. Discussion/Conclusion: Again, highlight the importance of your research and the gaps in the existing literature.
Rubric for Evaluating and Assessing Written Work
Written work is graded based on completion of the assignment in accordance with the instructions, guidelines, and expectations for the assignment. Students are expected to demonstrate that they put forth time and effort, have knowledge regarding the subject matter, and proper grammar and spelling. Students are expected to proofread and edit all written work.
Grades for written work have the following meaning for this course:
?A? level work (90-100) is clearly outstanding and reflects substantial effort. All aspects of the assignment are responded to in a cogent, organized and cohesive manner. Well-chosen, supportive examples (and citations) and persuasive reasoning are utilized. Written work falling into this category will demonstrate clarity of purpose, organization, and communication. The mechanics of the paper are excellent ? there are very few grammatical or spelling errors.
?B? level work (80-89) is of high quality. Most of the aspects of the assignment are covered in an adequate and organized manner. Supportive examples are given and arguments are organized and sensible. There is a clear structure to the paper. The mechanics of the paper are good ? there may be some minor grammatical and/or spelling errors, but these do not detract substantially from the content of the paper.
?C? level work (70-79) is average and bordering on unsatisfactory. The paper shows serious weaknesses and/or a lack of effort. The assignment is not addressed and/or the response is incoherent. There is little obvious structure to the paper. The mechanics of the paper are poor.
?Below C? level work (0-69) is completely unsatisfactory. The paper shows serious weaknesses, a lack of effort, a lack of understanding, and/or procrastination. The assignment is incomplete and incoherent.
Further points of consideration:
? Content: Includes consistency with assigned topic, the general flow of ideas, sticks to thesis, supporting details, clear expression of ideas without much deviation from the thesis.
? Structure: Includes the main idea, body-paragraphs that support the thesis, clear transitions, conclusion and summary of main ideas.
? Grammar: Includes the use of grammatical rules, attention to spelling and editing, appropriate syntax, and readability.
? Format: Includes consistency of general format (ASA, APA), including the structure, heading, margins, and citations etc.
Research design: Qualitative method with secondary data analysis and participant observation and interviews
Research question: Is aid being given to Afghanistan used favorably toward communities that need it the most?
Working Abstract not finished:
ABSTRACT
For the last few decades, Afghanistan has been in a state of turmoil. For almost twelve years, millions of dollars-worth of aid and funds has poured into Afghanistan to help with the rebuilding of this country. This country has an extensive history of a power struggle between national and local leaders. Is the money given to Afghanistan for aid being used for the most benefit and is it benefiting the right communities? Research appears to show (why do you say ?appears??) that much of the money going into Afghanistan ends up benefiting religious leaders, tribal leaders, and other higher groups (what are ?higher groups??) (citations). because These leaders are the ones that who basically control the financial realm of that part of the world (citations). Research also appears to show (why do you say ?appears??) that this happens because leaders do not really know how to effectively put that money to use to benefit everyone (citations). Many of these leaders allocate money to favor themselves. The poorer communities within Afghanistan seem to get poorer due to this. Communities really needing the aid are not getting as much because the leaders have not been educated on how to allocate money. and have Rather, communities have just been handed the pot money with no real education on how to disperse it out adequately within their community (citations). Studies have found that the main concern for many of the tribes and communities within Afghanistan is repairing their ?broken economy,? which is the root of all miseries in social, educational, governing, and health aspects (citations).
This is a long abstract. Abstracts consist of a summary of the central issue and an overview of the proposed research. You make no mention of your proposed research. How do you propose researching this issue?
I. BACKGROUND
A. CONFLICTS
1. History
2. Effects on Afghanistan
B. POPULATION
1. Poorer Rural Areas
a. Less access to healthcare, electricity, et.
2. Urban Areas
a. Better Care
C. FOREIGN AND LOCAL AID WITHIN AFGHANISTAN
1. Bonn Agreement
2. Tokyo Pledging Conference
D. ROLE OF LOCAL AND NATIONAL LEADERS
1. What is the role of leaders regarding aid?
2. Corruption within leader organization and how it affects population and aid they receive
E. LACK OF EDUCATION
1. Population
2. Leaders
3. Effects it has toward aid and where it goes
F. EFFECTIVENESS OF AID GIVEN
1. Who it effects
2. Where does aid mostly go
3. Should it be going elsewhere
4. Is there anyone else more qualified to handle aid within the country
II. RELEVANCE
A. EXPLANATION OF HOW PROPOSED RESEARCH CONTRIBUTES TO EXISTING LITERATURE THROUGH METHODS AND POLICY
B. IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE POLICY
1. Does aid given need to be more closely tracked?
2. Should aid continue to be given?
III. LITERATURE REVIEW
A. Common finding on aid within articles
B. UNDERSTANDING THEORY BASE
1. Aid not being correctly given where it needs to be
C. HISTORY
1. Previous research on aid (includes from background)
D. LIMITATIONS
1. Geography
2. Lack of Education
3. Fear of Backlash from government
4. Conflict within country
5. Stability
E. OPPORTUNITY FOR FURTHER RESEARCH
1. Limited due to conflict
2. There for urban more secure areas
IV. STUDY DESIGN
A. IMPLICIT ASSUMPTIONS
1. Aid probably doesn?t go where it needs to because country continues to be in dire conflict with entire villages and areas suffering
2. Huge lack of education throughout country
B. RESEARCH CONDUCTION
1. Population to Study
2. Where and When
a. Within Country
b. Within two year time frame
3. Methods-Qualitative
a. Participant Observation
b. Secondary Data Analysis
c. Individual Interviews
d. Data Collection of Aid given
4. Choosing Method
a. Easiest way to determine whether people are getting aid and who is getting what type of aid
b. Corruption Factor
C. DATA COLLECTION
1. Who gives aid to Afghanistan
2. How does each individual feel they benefit
3. Whether Afghanis in rural villages feel they are as well off as in urban areas
4. Whether aid is going to right places needed
5. Where aid needs to go most
D. VARIABLES
1. Corruption
2. Fear
3. Individuals
4. Conflict
E. DATA COLLECTED
1. Combine Data
2. Propose plan to better implement aid long term rather than short term
V. RESULTS
A. LIMITATIONS
1. Geography
2. Access to People
3. Fear
4. Corruption
5. Conflict
B. UNAVAILABLE RESOURCES
1. Possible aid given to leaders
C. POTENTIAL ISSUES
1. Government Backlash
2. Validity of interviews
D. FINDINGS
1. Support or Refute
E. EXPECTATION OF FINDINGS
F. WRONG CONCLUSION?
VI. CONCLUSION
A. IMPORTANCE OF AID AND WHERE IT IS GOING
B. IMPORTANCE THAT IT GOES TO PLACES NEEDED
C. GAPS
REFERENCE PAGE