Search Our Essay Database

Essay Instructions: The Research Paper assignment for Criminal Courts and Professional Ethics will be based on one of the following topic:


Punishment: Too Much or Not Enough


Write a well-organized and researched 4-7 page paper based on the trends, innovation, and the future of criminal justice or ethics. Your paper must contain a minimum of 5 resources from Internet sources, professional journal articles or resources related to the profession. Your text may serve as a source as well.
The APA rules for formatting, quoting, paraphrasing, citing, and listing of sources are to be followed.

There are faxes for this order.

Customer is requesting that (Philipj) completes this order.

Essay Instructions: Hi, I requesting writer, "Themich" to complete part two...

Please select one question from 1-3.. Please use APA format when using sources. Word count is 600. Thanks

1. ?Anything goes? is an interesting way to describe the current state of the nation?s approach to punishment. Do you feel it is accurate? If yes, why? If not, why not? What other aspects of our nation?s current approach to sanctions?besides those listed and discussed by Blomberg and Lucken?do you feel bolsters your position?

2. What is your reaction to restorative justice and its undergirding theoretical framework (i.e., reintegrative shaming)? What is the most interesting aspect of it? Do you think the US should adopt ?restorative corrections?? If yes, what would it look like? If not, why not?

3. Blomberg and Lucken feel that future of punishments should be decided by a partnership between citizens, criminologists, legislators, policy makers, and practitioners. What would it take to make this partnership work? Is there a philosophy on punishment that you fee would support such a partnership? Explain your choice.

Essay Instructions: Discuss one of these topics.

1. Plato seems to think that he can reconcile an exclusively therapeutic purpose of punishment with the application of the death penalty. Can his efforts be justified?

2. While it may be relatively easy to say who deserves punishment, it is less easy to indicate who has the right to administer it, and why. Locke’s solution cleverly relieves the victim of crime (who can often be unable to do very much as a result of the crime) of the exclusive privilege to either punish or assign the right. Does he persuade you that there is a general natural right to punish?

3. Since Leibniz and Locke, we have often felt that in order to be regarded as a proper subject of punishment, one must be in some way capable of acknowledging the condemnable act as one’s own. Do you accept this view? Why?

4. A follower of Kant might claim that a criminal has brought a proportionate punishment to his crime upon himself as a result of his action, and that this must be a harm that the community is obliged to inflict on him in justice. Do you agree with this view?

5. Are the rights to answer for a particular action and to be punished only proportionately constituted by some (internal or external) form of repressive cruelty? Comment on Nietzsche’s “Second Essay.”
Customer is requesting that (Cathii) completes this order.

Essay Instructions: Write a paper that analyzes the principal objectives of punishment within the U.S. corrections system.

Please include these three questions...

-What are the state and federal objectives of punishment?

-How does sentencing affect the state and federal corrections systems overall? Support your answer.

-What is determinate and indeterminate sentencing? Which sentencing model do you feel is most appropriate? Explain why and provide an example.