Search Our Essay Database

Essay Instructions: PSYCHOTHERAPY AND BUDDHISM IS WHAT THIS CLASS IS ABOUT
Take Away:
You are required to develop and maintain a Take Away based on your class required readings. The Take Away begins as an assigned reading WHICH IS EVERY CHAPTER IN THE BOOK upon which you continue to build as you engage in more thinking. you will have identified the major concepts in the course from this first book, The Take Away also provides the major concepts and key terms in each chapter of the book

The book is PSYCHOTHERAPY WITHOUT THE SELF a Buddhist perspective by Mark Epstein, M.D. author of Thoughts without a thinker
information from our readings that serve as a ready information base upon which to build better Self-Analysis papers throughout the semester.
The Take Away serve as a working example of an integrated learning platform through which you can refine both your research and writing skills in preparation for your IS Capstone Thesis.

So with that, what you must do is write what hes describes as "take ways" from every chapter
part one Buddha within the book is 1- 4 chapters
part two Freud within the book is chapters 5-8

EACH CHAPTER HAS THERE OWN TAKEAWAY AND KEY TERMS
1. Epstein, Mark (1995). Thought Without a Thinker: Psychotherapy from a Buddhist Perspective. N.Y.: Basic Books.

4 PAGES IN ALL, YOU CAN NUMBER EACH TAKEAWAY 1-8 ONE AFTER THE OTHER

? Ability to remain focused on the assignment topic;
? Clarity of your writing;
? Relevance and strength of connection to readings, relate to reading also
? Organization of the EACH CHAPTER TAKE AWAY
? Quality of writing, grammar, spelling, and related editorial elements.


If you have any questions fill free to email me if you need more information or understanding to this it is due tomorrow so please get a hold of me if you need me dose not matter the time!!! even if its 1 am in the morning.

Please make it clear and brilliant.

Essay Instructions: .pdf uploaded: Yalom, Irvin D. "2 - If Rape Were Legal..." Love's Executioner and Other Tales of Psychotherapy. New York: Basic, 1989. 59-78. Print.

.pdf uploaded of four (4) psychotherapies from Corsini and Wedding?s textbook.

Details:
Consider the case in Love?s Executioner entitled, If Rape Were Legal. Drawing on the concepts in four of the systems of psychotherapy we have examined, Dynamic, Person-Centered, and REBT, and Adlerian comment on specific interactions in the text which illustrate some of the therapeutic principles of these systems. I would like you to consider the place of interpretation of meaning, the role of the unconscious, defensive processes, style of life, social interest, empathy, positive regard, congruence, disputation of ideas, and the nature of the therapeutic alliance. Be sure to illustrate your points and assertions with specific examples from the text. Restrict your attention only to the relationship between Yalom and Carlos. You are free to show how any other ideas from the four systems of therapy might be applied to the material.

Organize your essay and allow for the fact that Yalom is not trying for theoretical consistency of any type. Also, be aware that how these ideas may be made relevant to the case is open to argument- you may for example show how a concept applies in one exchange and how it is contradicted in another. If you cite text please cite the author or authors of the chapter in Corsini and Wedding.

Essay Instructions: .pdf uploaded: Yalom, Irvin D. "2 - If Rape Were Legal..." Love's Executioner and Other Tales of Psychotherapy. New York: Basic, 1989. 59-78. Print.

.pdf uploaded of four (4) psychotherapies from Corsini and Wedding?s textbook.

Details:
Consider the case in Love?s Executioner entitled, If Rape Were Legal. Drawing on the concepts in four of the systems of psychotherapy we have examined, Dynamic, Person-Centered, and REBT, and Adlerian comment on specific interactions in the text which illustrate some of the therapeutic principles of these systems. I would like you to consider the place of interpretation of meaning, the role of the unconscious, defensive processes, style of life, social interest, empathy, positive regard, congruence, disputation of ideas, and the nature of the therapeutic alliance. Be sure to illustrate your points and assertions with specific examples from the text. Restrict your attention only to the relationship between Yalom and Carlos. You are free to show how any other ideas from the four systems of therapy might be applied to the material.

Organize your essay and allow for the fact that Yalom is not trying for theoretical consistency of any type. Also, be aware that how these ideas may be made relevant to the case is open to argument- you may for example show how a concept applies in one exchange and how it is contradicted in another. If you cite text please cite the author or authors of the chapter in Corsini and Wedding.

Essay Instructions: THEORETICAL ESSAY FOR "THEORIES AND PRACTICE OF COUNSELING AND PSYCHOTHERAPY"

7 references. All factual information is to be cited. APA guidelines for both the structure of the essay and the referencing (this includes an Abstract of about 100 words). A judicious use of subheadings helps the reader follow an essay
Text book used for this subject (please use as one of the references): Corey, G. (2013) (9th ed.). Theories and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy

Using the Cognitive Behavioural and Person-Centred approaches (regarding counselling and psychotherapy) make a case for using these two perspectives in an integrative way when counselling a client.
Critically reviewing research literature on how the perspectives are different and/or similar, what aspects might you take from each perspective? What would be the advantages of integrating the two perspectives, and what might be some of the limitations of using such an approach in counselling someone? Include in the discussion any possible ethical considerations about using an integrative approach with someone.
In examining the essay, we will be looking to see:
(a) how well you have identified the two theoretical perspectives, and compared them;
(b) how well you have critically reviewed the literature on the two perspectives (including strengths and limitations)
(c) how well you have argued the case for using the approaches in an integrative approach, including addressing any ethical considerations;
(d) how well you have provided conclusions that flow logically from the literature you have reviewed, and
(e) how well you have demonstrated how theory, process and research are intertwined.