Search Our Essay Database

Essay Instructions: Organizational Change Plan ? Part III



Develop Part III of a comprehensive plan to implement an organizational change. Part III of your organizational change plan focuses on strategies for evaluating the proposed change. Prepare a 1,400- to 1,750-word plan with the following:
(See parts I & II attached)


? Describe how the effectiveness of your organizational change will be determined once it is implemented.

? Analyze possible outcome measurement strategies related to organizational change processes.

? Determine how you will measure quality, cost, and satisfaction outcomes to evaluate your proposed organizational change.

? Add a summary of previous work from other parts.

? Use at least four peer-reviewed articles to support your conclusions.

? Format your paper according to APA standards.

Essay Instructions: Organizational Change Plan Part II (Focused on reducing elopement, have info from first and third part of organizational change plan)
Develop part II of a comprehensive plan to implement an organization change. Part II of your organization change plan focuses on strategies for implementing the proposed change.
Describe the methods that will be used to monitor implementation of your proposed change.
Examine th relationship between the organization's related processes, systems, and personal or professional roles and their affect on your proposed organzational change.
Identify communicatio techniques that will be used to address any implementation issues that may arise.

Essay Instructions: Organizational Change Project Analysis

Topic: Mandatory overtime for nurses.
Change proposal on mandatory overtime for nurses.

Identify an idea for development of a comprehensive project to improve an aspect of your organization or an educational offering that will address such an issue (Mandatory overtime for nurses)
Be sure to focus on the change component and key stakeholders. The purpose of this assignment is to create a plan for organizational change.


This is a two part assignment. Please write part one and than part II. Do not put them together. Part One includes a brief description and history of the organization, the proposed change and rationale for the change, and ways in which the proposed change is compatible with the organization?s culture.

Content
? A description of the organization includes information about its history, vision/mission, goals and objectives
? Description of the change
? Description of ways in which the proposed change is compatible with the organizational culture
? Rationale for selection of the proposed change is described
? Support from professional literature is provided


Part Two are the theory used to guide the change process (Mandatory overtime for nurses), as well as strategies for implementing, monitoring and evaluating the proposed change. Resources needed are included as well.


Content
? Support for the need for the proposed change based on data obtained from one or more sources (e.g. community assessment, market analysis, economic projections, financial analysis)
? Steps needed for implementing and monitoring the proposed change
? Describe the change theory used and the steps needed for implementation
? Identify resources needed for implementation, monitoring, and evaluating the proposed change
? Monitoring and outcome measures are developed that could be used to identify whether or not the change was actually implemented as planned and/or whether or not the expected outcomes were obtained.

Support for the plan content includes at least 10-12 published professional references, at least three of which need to be published research reports

Essay Instructions: Models of Organizational Change and Transformation: Burke-Litwin Model


Background

In the SLP for this course, you will apply organizational change theories and diagnostic assessment tools to the United States Army. This builds your skills at applying knowledge from one context to another.

You will be analyzing this change process and developing your thoughts about it based on the background material. The larger, more systemic the change, the better. However, substantive change within a unit, function, or division will also work. Substantive change may include things like:
?a new CEO or other senior manager
?changes in technical systems
?restructuring
?changes in size (up or downsizing)
?changes in market focus
?changes in strategy or mission
?changes in major processes or procedures (e.g. implementation of ISO9000 or other quality control processes)
?etc....

Required Reading

Refer to the required and optional readings on change management, the theme for this module.

Assignment

Identify and describe a major change that has occurred, or that is in the process of planning and/or implementation, in United States Army.


Keys to the Assignment

The key aspects of this assignment that should be covered in your paper include:
?What is the organization? Give enough relevant background information to understand the situation.
?What happened, is happening, or about to happen?
?Why do you think this is happening?
?What is the scope of the change process?
?Who and what are involved?
?Who and what are not involved?

For this assignment you were to continue the application of the remaining factors in the model that you began working with in your mod 2 SLP (Burke-Litwin Model) to complete your diagnosis of this organizational change process assessment.

The key questions to be answered for this paper were:
-- How well do each of these change factors align with and support the direction of the overall change effort?
-- Are there any substantive issues that may need to be addressed? If so, what are they?
-- What diagnostic approaches would you suggest using to gather more detailed information, and how would you suggest they be implemented?


Assignment Expectations

Your paper will be evaluated on the following seven (7) points:
?Precision - Does the paper address the question(s) or task(s)?
?Breadth - Is the full breadth of the subject, i.e., the Keys to the Assignment, addressed?
?Depth - Does the paper address the topic in sufficient depth and include the background readings and other background resources as references?
?Critical thinking - Is the subject thought about critically, i.e., accurately, logically, relevantly, and precisely?
?Clarity - Is the writing clear and are the concepts articulated properly? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding to the questions or are points conveyed through excessive use of quotations?
?Organization - Is the paper well written? Are the grammar, spelling, and vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are headings included in all papers longer than two pages?
?Referencing (citations and references) - Does the paper include citations and quotation marks where appropriate? Are the references from the background readings and assignment present and properly cited? Are all the references listed in the bibliography present and referred to via citation?
?Application - Are the concepts of the module appropriately applied to the subject?