However, in light of approaching accreditation review, the results of this year's testing must be responded to quickly. Therefore, a suitable time frame for curriculum development would be three months across the slowest enrollment quarter for Meadowvale. Presuming this would be concurrent with the summer months, the fall semester thereafter would correspond with a pilot period. Refinement and full implementation would following the spring semester.

5.

Evaluation of acceptance and readiness should come in the form of close consultation. Because the positive working relationship between Dr. Lopez and the faculty will be so critical in effecting positive change, assessment should also be an open process of ongoing consultancy. Bi-weekly conferences with faculty can help to identify flaws or opportunities in curriculum going forward.

Case #2:

1.

As it is presented in the case history, the faculty development system at Rosemount is highly flawed. The structure is currently a loose and...
[ View Full Essay]