Hard evidence was hard to find, but in cases where corruption was proven, people were punished, often through loss of job or leadership position (Bailey 15-16). Both Harvey and Bailey recommend more transparency in the processes of registration for and distribution of aid and responsive mechanisms to receive, investigate, and address recipient complaints.

The International Criminal Court seems to be able to hold itself above the corrupting influences that can affect on-the-ground operations like peacekeeping and aid distribution. In the case of Uganda, in March 2005, a delegation of leaders from the north of the country visited the ICC headquarters to stop the court from issuing arrest warrants of top LRA leaders, including Joseph Kony (Rubongoya 220). They were worried that such action would threaten the peace process. Nonetheless, in October of that year, the court issued the warrants (Rubongoya 224). This example illustrates a strong commitment to the mission...
[ View Full Essay]