S. domestic support for agricultural products and (2) its export guarantee credits for the same type of products. Practically, Brazil questioned the support offered by U.S. To its agricultural producers, the instruments used for this support and all additional programmes and support, such as Production Flexibility Contract payments. Moreover, the latin american country considered that the export guarantee credits offered by U.S. To its agricultural producers were more favourable than those available on the market in the same period of time. A panel disscussion has been requested in November 2007 and Argentina, Australia, Chile, China, the European Communities, India, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Nicaragua, South Africa, Chinese, Taipei, Thailand and Turket reserved their third-party rights. The case is still under dispute.

Reference List

Chang, P.L. 2004. The Politics of WTO Enforcement Mechanism. School of Economics and Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Working Paper 259756.

Davey, W.J. 2005. The WTO Dispute...
[ View Full Essay]