" (Redish and Phillips, 1979) the relationship is not as clear between the standard and balancing test that the court used in the Hanna and Byrd case. (Redish and Phillips, 1979; paraphrased)

Burbank (1934) states in the "Rules Enabling Act of 1934" published in May 1982 in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review " that unless one is a cynic, it would leave one to wonder "that the original Federal Rules of Civil Procedure survived challenges intact." The decision of the court in more recent decisions such as in Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., has remained essentially unchanged.

SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

Quite simply, the Federal courts do not have the Constitutional right to claim superiority over the decisions made by and within the individual states but instead, the Federal Courts serve to provide a venue for those cases of diversity and in which justice is better served by the hearing...
[ View Full Essay]