Jones, 2006), a qualitative study, to (Humar, 2001), a quantitative study, both studies were conducted for the same problem of serious venous catheter-related infections. Both studies were conducted for the same purpose of determining effective methods for venous catheter-related infection prevention. And, both studies used theoretical research of review of previous studies of venous catheter-related infections. Both studies identified limitations in previous studies and (Humar, 2001) identified limitations in the present study.

Where (Jones, 2006) was focused on examining weaknesses and findings of previous studies compared to standard best practices in data collection, (Humar, 2001) was a randomized control trial that tested two antiseptic solutions to determine which one was the most effective at preventing infection in central venous catheter sites. The different designs caused different data analysis where (Humar, 2001) used a statistical analysis of data collected and (Jones, 2006) used an analytical analysis of the instruments used, techniques...
[ View Full Essay]