Search Our Essay Database

Essay Instructions: Depending upon the quality of work I have an additional 3 essays that I'd be able to request your assistance.
Assignment #1:
Applying Mill's* theory to the following decision from Middlemarch** in chapter 33 where Mary Garth refuses to take money from the dying Featherstone proves her good, honest nature.

The paper needs to be organized in the following five steps below with an emphasis on the application of Mill's theory in steps 2 and 3:

Step 1: a) Concisely describe the steps the agent (Mary Garth) followed to reach a decision- explain what her or she did and the reasons for those steps. b) Concisely describe what you would have done, and why, if you had been in the agents (Mary Garth) position, using your own pretheoretical, original way of making decisions.
Step 2: Set out the procedure the agent would follow and the decision the agent would reach if she were to use act utilitarianism to reach a decision.
Step 3: Set out the procedure the agent would follow and the decision the agent would reach if she were to use rule utilitarianism to reach the decision.
Step 4: Concisely compare steps and results of the four approaches outlined above- the agent's actual reasoning, your pretheoretical reasoning, act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism.
Step 5: Describe any comments or conclusions that you draw from the comparisons you made in step 4.

I'll fax additional materials that should provide added support to complete this request. Also I will provide two sample papers that can provide some ideas to the writer.

*(Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism. Ed. George Sher., 2nd edition, Indianapolis:Hackett, 2001.)

**(Eliot, George. Middlemarch. New York: Penguin, 1984)

There are faxes for this order.

Essay Instructions: Instructions

For this assignment, write a 1,000- to 1,250-word paper in which you apply Mill's theories to Lydgate's decision in chapter 18 on how to votehe from Middlemarch:

Organize your paper according to the five steps below, with an emphasis on the application of Mill's theory in steps 2 and 3.

Step 1
Concisely describe the steps the agent followed to reach a decision??"explain what he or she did and the reasons for those steps.
Concisely describe what you would have done, and why, if you had been in the agent's position, using your own pretheoretical, ordinary way of making decisions.
Step 2
Set out the procedure the agent would follow and the decision the agent would reach if he or she were to use act utilitarianism to reach the decision.

Step 3
Set out the procedure the agent would follow and the decision the agent would reach if he or she were to use rule utilitarianism to reach the decision.

Step 4
Concisely compare the steps and results of the four approaches outlined above??"the agent's actual reasoning, your pretheoretical reasoning, act utilitarianism, and rule utilitarianism. (Here again, be concise; you may not be able to include everything that occurs to you.)

Step 5
Describe any comments or conclusions that you draw from the comparisons you made in step 4.

note:please quote some sentences from the book and add (Eliot, Page #) after them.
There are faxes for this order.

Essay Instructions: Request for Serban!

Assignment #2: Applying Kant's* theory to the following decision from Middlemarch** in chapter 48 where Dorthea's decision (in Ch 48) of whether to make the promise Casaubon asks of her.
The paper needs to be organized in the following five steps below with an emphasis on the application of Kant's theory in steps 2 and 3:
Step 1: a) Concisely describe the steps the agent (Dorothea followed to reach a decision- explain what she did and the reasons for those steps. b) Concisely describe what you would have done, and why, if you had been in the agents (Dorothea's) position, using your own pretheoretical, original way of making decisions.
Step 2: Set out the procedure the agent would follow and the decision the agent would reach if she were to use Kant's first formulation to reach the decision.
Step 3: Set out the procedure the agent would follow and the decision the agent would reach if she were to use Kant's second formulation to reach the decision.
Step 4: Concisely compare steps and results of the four approaches outlined above- the agent's actual reasoning, your pretheoretical reasoning, Kant's first formulation, and Kant's second formulation.
Step 5: Describe any comments or conclusions that you draw from the comparisons you made in step 4.
I'll fax additional materials that should provide added support to complete this request. Also I will provide two sample papers that can provide some ideas to the writer.

*Kant, Immanuel. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by James W. Ellington. Indianapolis: Hacket, 1993.

**(Eliot, George. Middlemarch. New York: Penguin, 1984)
There are faxes for this order.

Essay Instructions: Request to use writer username: Serban Brebenel.
Assignment #4: Applying Aristotle’s* theory to the following decision from Middlemarch** in chapter 81 where Rosamond’s decision to speak to Dorothea and to a decision from “The Surrounded”*** where Catharine’s decision to change her religion.

The paper needs to be organized in the following three steps below with an emphasis on the application of Aristotle’s theory in Step 2.

Step 1: a) Describe the process by which each agent reached a decision- be brief to leave room for your application of Aristotle’s theory. b) Very briefly state your own pretheoretical opinion of each agent’s decision, and the reasons for that opinion.
Step 2: Describe the decision each agent would have reached, and the process by which he or she would have reached it, if the agent had used Aristotle’s theory to make the decision be sure to clearly set out your reasons for thinking that Aristotle’s theory would yield the results you claim.
Step 3: Based on your discussion of steps 1 and 2, make any conclusions about Aristotle’s ethical theory that you think are appropriate.

I'll fax additional materials that should provide added support to complete this request.

*Aristotle. The Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. David Ross. Rev. by J.L. Ackrill and J.O. Urmson: Oxford University Press, 1998.

** Eliot, George. Middlemarch. New York: Penguin, 1984.

*** McNickle, D’Arcy. The Surrounded. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1965.

There are faxes for this order.