Essay Instructions: The paper focuses on analyzing significant positions for a controversial health care issue.
This paper will count for 30% of your grade.
The issue that you choose clearly must have a pro and con side (e.g., “All US citizens should be (should not be) required to purchase health insurance”). These sides must be supported through presentation of credible literature that supports both a national and global perspective and includes health care policy implications. This literature should provide depth and breadth to your paper.
Literature support should be diverse: please make sure you have a range of references, including books, credible interviews, media references, hard copy journal articles, and some internet citations, etc. You will need at least 9 diverse (coming from different types of resources ??" professional journals, newspapers, internet sources, etc.) for this paper.
Thus, the position paper will need to be 10 pages in 12 font type and offer credible references and insight into both sides of an issue. You’ll want to have a strong evidence foundation before you finally write about the side you support and why
The following ideas should be considered for this assignment (worth 100 points):
Choose a topic that clearly has a pro and con position; for example, a health care reform which requires citizens to purchase health insurance has both supporters and those who oppose it. Your paper should include a global perspective (what do other countries “do” about this issue?) and legislative perspectives (what laws and regulations, health care policy issues revolve around this issue? These must be factual.)
Provide rationale (with a range of references, both classic (around a long time and perceived as credible) and more recent references; strive for a variation in reference type so that your reference list has books, journals, and professional organization position statements, for example; only use internet references when you can verify their credibility.
Provide a conclusion: how does this issue relate to cost, access, and quality?
Organize your paper systematically; watch grammar, use of direct quotes, syntax, length of paragraphs and connection of ideas in paragraphs and between paragraphs; please use active voice rather than passive voice; have someone proof read your paper before you submit for grading; use APA sixth edition format for organization and references.
Grading Criteria:
10 points Introduction of topic and CLEAR statement of the issue. This means I should know what you’re talking about without struggling.
30 points Pro and con side with examples that systematically address cost, access and quality and global and health care policy implications; classical and recent references; coherent discussion in the 3rd person (“he, she, it”). Include potential biases of reference authors that influence slant of argument.
15 points Clear statement of the rationale for your position; discussion of reasons for your pro or con position based on your earlier discussion; discussion of possible negative or positive aspects of your position; use of 1st (“I”) person in your argument based on references. What do you think? Your opinion should be guided by information not just how you “feel” about it or how someone told you to think about the issue.
10 points Conclusion that includes how issue influences cost, quality, or access from a global perspective and is relevant to the discussed issue
10 points Format that includes use of appropriate subheadings/length of paper approximately 10-12 pages of text, APA format *
10 points Use of proper grammar and syntax/punctuation, use of active voice for powerful statement of issue *
10 points Clear and argumentative text that shows critical thinking *
5 points Substantive draft (Depth and breadth of the issue is evident.)
* 30 points are devoted to format, grammar and syntax/ punctuation, clear critical thinking and APA format
To provide you with a solid policy-based starting point for the process, I have selected 4 pieces of legislation from which you may frame an issue for your position paper. You will not argue for or against the legislation itself. Rather you will formulate an issue statement according to social problems the legislation was intended to fix.
THIS IS THE TOPIC I HAVE CHOSEN:
Patient Protection and Affordable Care (PPACA) of 2010
Should someone with a pre-existing condition be denied health insurance?
The first part of the Issues Paper is to choose one of the pieces of legislation that has been provided in the rubric and to write a problem statement that you will use to argue throughout the paper. You must choose one of the pieces of legislation that we have listed, but you are free to choose any one you like. We have even given you sample problem statements which you may also use, but you may also write a new one that relates to the legislation if you wish. Please note, you will not argue personally for or against the issue until the section that asks for your opinion.
So what will you write? An introductory paragraph is always essential. Then introduce the issue. Write a section of the paper that supports one side of the issue or argument. Write another section of the paper that supports the other side of the issue or argument. Stay focused on what you are writing about. You are not arguing FOR or AGAINST the legislation itself, but for or against an issue within it or something it relates to. (Look to the problem statements for ideas). After you have written two sections, each with headers that describe the slant of the position, write a section based on your informed opinion of the issue (My opinion is that one SHOULD NOT be denied health insurance based on pre-existing conditions). When I say informed, I mean, not a set of ideas you may have always believed, but a perspective based on the literature that supports your ideas. Follow this section with a conclusion in which you sum it all up and bring it to a finish. Have a separate cover page and a separate reference page. The total for the paper should be 10-12 pages, not counting the cover page or the reference page. Use legitimate sources which does not include Wikipedia, a blog someone you know wrote or a "news" opinion show. The rubric asks you to use a variety of sources but some of them must be research based. You will lose points if your sources are not credible, even if they are in the mainstream media.
I have provided you with my introductory paragraph to lead the way:
With a little over a year as the Commander in Chief of the Unites States of America, President Barack Obama put into existence the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) of 2010. The principal reason for this act is to address the many short-comings America has in its health care system concerning cost, quality and access by allowing consumers of the health care industry to be better protected while making informed decisions about their health. A population that has been specifically targeted in the act is those with pre-existing medical conditions. Previously, insurance companies could deny those with pre-existing conditions without any accountability as to why or how. Now, amendments in the PPACA has set certain criteria that doesn’t allow denial for certain ages, and it also sanctions premiums be lowered for those with pre-existing conditions. While some are content with the new law, others aren’t so pleased.