and Plato. “The Goal of Leadership”:
This essay is a demonstration on how two minds have worked on an idea, and or problem. Take these two people. THEN, evaluate what is under consideration: part of an idea in political, social, economic, religion, cultural, and focus even more clearly on the origins, substance, functions, or consequences as argued by the two people. For example, Al and Charlie are convinced that breakfast is good for you (its consequence). But Al says it is good for the body, Charlie says it does wonders really for the soul. Just give the evidence that each one presents, and then add it all up: accuracy, sameness, completeness. Let the evidence talk through this amplification.
Analytical Levels: Origins, Substance, Functions, Consequence.
Explanatory Sequence: Statement, Evidence, Amplification.
Comparative Insights: Context, Argument, Evidence, Audience.
* Maximum of 10 quotes from each document
* I have chosen ‘2’ sources only because I assumed you would need two different books for research on Machiavelli
and Plato. If you only need one, than that’s fine.
Finally, I do not mean to insult you with this quote but it was given to me by my institute so I decided to add it to the specifications:
“Please remember that this is an essay, not a book report or research paper. This means that you are not giving me sentence-lists or sentence-salads containing, essentially, collections of statements (he said this, he said that) or observations by you (I feel this or that about this or that). Instead you are doing analysis, presenting a case.”
Thank-you for your efforts.
[ Order Custom Essay ]
[ View Full Essay ]