Linguistics Essays and Research Papers

Instructions for Linguistics College Essay Examples

Title: language acquisition

  • Total Pages: 10
  • Words: 3221
  • Works Cited:8
  • Citation Style: Harvard
  • Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: Hi there,

well,i had to write an essay and i did but sadly didn't pass!!!!so i have to WRITE IT again using some sources which i put them down there!!! of course i want you to use more sources as i ask 8 but the main soursces are those that i put it!!!

also, please follow the common that i got it from my tutor at the uni!!!!i really wanted as good as u can!!

SOURSECES THAT IT MUST BE USED ARE:

1-(Can input explain children’s me-for-I errors?*)

2-(http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/cschutze/Dissert.pdf)


ALI

the common from my teacher at uni!!!


It would be better to start again, because there is very little of the
original essay that is relevant to the topic. The two major things that
you need to read are the paper I have attached, and the relevant
sections (principally 5.3) of Schutze's PhD thesis, available at
http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/cschutze/Dissert.pdf, which give
opposing views on the reason for children's case errors. The phenomenon
you need to focus on is why many children got through a stage when they
say:
Me want that
Or
My want that
Instead of the adult target
I want that.
Schutze gives an argument based on syntactic theory, whereas Kirjavainen
and Theakston # argue that it is due to the nature of the input the
child receives. You need to explain these arguments and critically
evaluate them, and come to your own conclusion. Be very careful to
explain what the papers say in your own words and not stick too closely
to the wording of the papers.
You should also read the following, and you may wish to read some of the
papers referred to in the references of these papers

Rispoli, M (1998) 'Me or my: two different patterns of pronoun case
errors' Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 41(2):385-93.

Rispoli, M (2005) 'When children reach beyond their grasp: why some
children make pronoun case errors and others don't' Journal of Child
Language 32.1 (93-116

There are faxes for this order.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Works Cited:

References:

Kirajavainen, M., Theakston, A, & Lieven, E. 2009. Can input explain children's me-for-I errors? Journal of Child Language, 36, 1091 -- 1114.

Rispoli, M. 1998. Me or My: Two Different Patterns of Pronoun Case Errors. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(2), 385 -- 393.

Rispoli, M. 2005. When children reach beyond their grasp: why some children make pronoun case errors and others don't. Journal of Child Language, 32, 93 -- 116.

Sag, I.A., Wasow, T., & Bender, E.M. 2003. Syntactic theory: a formal introduction. Center for the Study of Language and Information: Stanford, CA.

Schutze, C.T.R. 1997. INFL in Child and Adult Language: Agreement, Case, and Licensing. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Wechsler, S. 2010. What 'you' and 'I' mean to each other: Person indexicals, self ascription and theory of mind. Language, 86(2), 332 -- 365.

Van Rij, J., Van Rijn, H., & Hendriks, P. 2010. Cognitive architectures and languages acquisition: A case study in pronoun comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 37, 731 -- 766.

Zesiger, P., Zesiger, L.C., Arabatzi, M., Baranzini, L., Cronel-Ohayon, S., Franck, J., Frauenfelder, U.H., Hamman, C., & Rizzi, L. 2010. The acquisition of pronouns by French children: A parallel study of production and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(4), 571 -- 603.

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: Linguistics Theories and Discourse Analysis

  • Total Pages: 7
  • Words: 1863
  • Bibliography:10
  • Citation Style: MLA
  • Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: I want the essay can do more analysis on the linguistics theories and discourse
The essay I need the writer can show me the relationship between linguistics theories and discourse
More important is the writer really need do more ANALYSIS, MORE EXAMPLE OF ACTUAL SPEECH and the essay I hope that the writer can divide into 4-5 parts clearly
I 'll upload some resources to the writer, please do the essay according the resources
Thank you very much
There are faxes for this order.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Bibliography:

References:

Aarts, B. & McMahon, a. (2006). The handbook of English linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell;

1st edition.

Akmajian, a., Demers, R.A., Farmer, a.K., & Harnish, R.M. (2010). Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication. The MIT Press; 6th edition.

Brown, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. MA: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, H.H. (1996). Using language. MA: Cambridge University Press.

Fabb, Nigel. (1997). Linguistics and literature: Language in the verbal arts of the world.

Wiley-Blackwell.

Schiffrin, D. (1988). Discourse markers. MA: Cambridge University Press.

Tannen, D. (2011). "Discourse analysis." Linguistic Society of America. Accessed on March 26, 2011: http://www.lsadc.org/info/ling-fields-discourse.cfm

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: Linguistics Syntax Minimalist theory

  • Total Pages: 14
  • Words: 4504
  • Sources:0
  • Citation Style: APA
  • Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: Specific Topic /Titles:

- Linguistics / Syntax/ Minimalist theory
Specific Topic /Titles:

A) Agree-based Approach (Chomsky, 1999,2000, 2001) to EPP (Extended Projection Principle) in English expletive 'there" Condtruction.

B) A minimalist approach to expletive ?there" construction in English.

C) EPP in the English Expletive "there" construction.

D) The roles of EPP features in English expletive 'there' construction.

E) EPP and Case in the English expletive "there" constructions based on the viewpoint of "Feature-checking theory of Chomsky(1999,2000).

e. Total sources requested


Chomsky(1995)- feature movement

Chomsky(2000, 2001. 2004) -operation "Agree"

Chomsky(2000, 2001, 2004) holds that expletive "there" has neither case nor complete set of ??-features.

The only feature "there" has is the uninterpretable feature [person].

Moro(2006), Groat(1999) - there has a Case, there is the placeholder of the small clause

Lasnik, H (2001). A Note on the EPP, Linguistic Inquiry 32, 356-362.

Rosengren, I (2002). EPP: A syntactic device in the service of semantics, Studia Linguistica 56.2, 145-190.

Groat, Erich M. (1995). English expletives: A minimalist approach, LI 26, 354-364.

f. Specifications of the order (all information we will need to complete your order)

The completed paper should have the following organizations:

A) Abstract

B) introduction - purpose of study

C) survey or review of previous research in this field : literature review

D) discuss the problems of prior study & propose your arguments

E) suggest alternative proposal for your arguments

F) summary and conclusion

A) Agree-based Approach (Chomsky, 1999,2000, 2001) to EPP (Extended Projection Principle) in English expletive 'there" Condtruction.

B) A minimalist approach to expletive ?there" construction in English.

C) EPP in the English Expletive "there" construction.

D) The roles of EPP features in English expletive 'there' construction.

E) EPP and Case in the English expletive "there" constructions based on the viewpoint of "Feature-checking theory of Chomsky(1999,2000).

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Sources:

References

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky (2000). Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. Step-by-Step: Essays on Minimalist

Syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Martin, r., D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (eds).

Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Chomsky (2001). On Nature and Language (Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi, ed.).

Chomsky (2001). Derivation by Phase. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Kenstovicz, Michael (ed).

Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. pp. 1-54.

Chomsky (2004). Beyond Explanatory Adequacy. Structures and Beyond. Belletti Adriana (ed).

The Cartography of Syntactic Structure Vol 3. Oxford: OUP. pp. 104-131.

Garcia, J. (2007). On the Nature and Status of the EPP. University of Connecticut. Retreived June 1, 2010 from http://homepages.uconn.edu/~juv07002/Villa-

Garcia%20%282007%29%20Squib%20On%20the%20Nature%20and%20Status%20of

%20the%20EPP.pdf

Groat, Erich M. (1995). English expletives: A minimalist approach, Linguistic Inquiry. 26, 354-

Groat, Erich, and John O'Neil. 1996. Spell-Out at the LF-interface. In Minimal ideas, ed. W.

Abraham, S.D. Epstein, H. Thrainsson, and C.J.-W. Zwart, 113-139. Amsterdam,

Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Lasnik, H (2001). A Note on the EPP, Linguistic Inquiry 32, 356-362.

Moro, Andrea (2006): "Some Notes on Unstable Structures," Ms., Universita San Raffaele di

Milano.

Rosengren, I (2002). EPP: A syntactic device in the service of semantics,

Studia Linguistica

56.2, 145-190.

Smith, E., Jonides, J. & Koeppe, R. et al. (1995). Spatial vs. object working memory: pet investigations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 7 (3): 337-356.

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: Literary review of the literature and research of computer assisted writing learning

  • Total Pages: 20
  • Words: 6823
  • References:40
  • Citation Style: APA
  • Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: Nothing needed more than what I already mentioned above. I just hope that the wirter is an expert in this area becuase it is a new area. He should be an Applied Linguistics person to know what I am talking about.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
References:

Bibliography

Introduction to Computational Linguistics (2006) Computer-Assisted Language Learning http://www.georgetown.edu/faculty/ballc/ling361/ling361_call.html.

Lusnia, Karen B. (1000) Teaching Teachers Long-Distance: A Paradigm-Shift for the Teacher-Planner in Mexico - Applied Linguistics. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language Teacher Education.

Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). Excerpts from discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.

Belz, J.A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/BELZ/default.html.

Belz, J.A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68-117. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/belz/default.html

Belz, J.A., & Kinginger, C. (2002). The cross-linguistic development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies. Canadian Modern Language Review/Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 59(2), 189-214.

Belz, J.A., & Kinginger, C. (2003). Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language Learning, 53(4), 591-647.

Belz, J.A., & Muller-Hartmann, A. (2003). Teachers as intercultural learners: Negotiating German-American telecollaboration along the institutional fault line. Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 71-89.

Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/default.html

Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22(1), 17-31.

Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (1992). Rethinking context. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gebhard, M. (2004). Fast capitalism and second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 245-265.

Gibson, J.J. (1979). An ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Grossman, P., Smagorinsky, P., & Valencia, S. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108(1) 1-29.

Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriated methodology and social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457-476. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://www.jstor.org/view/00267902/ap020557/02a00020/0?frame=noframe&userID=9455d2d1 amherst.edu/01cce440357b731034d3e4c10&dpi=3&config=jstor - http://www.jstor.org/view/00267902/ap02/

Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Kinginger, C., Gourves-Hayward, A., & Simpson, V. (1999). A tele-collaborative course on French-American intercultural communication. French Review, 72(5), 853-866.

Kinginger, C. (2000). Learning the pragmatics of solidarity in the networked foreign language classroom. In J.K. Hall & L.S. Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 23-46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners' discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 143-166.

Ktter, M. (2003). Negotiation of meaning and codeswitching in online tandems. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 145-172. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/kotter/default.html

Kramsch, C. (1985). Classroom interaction and discourse options. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(2), 169-183.

Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Kramsch, C. (2000). Language and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kramsch, C. (Ed.). (2002). Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Kramsch, C., & Lam, E. (2003). The ecology of an SLA community. In J.H. Leather & J. van Dam. (Eds.), Ecology of language acquisition (pp. 141-158). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. (2002). Foreign language learning as a global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 83-100). London: Routledge.

Lam, W.S.E. (2000). Second language literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457-482.

Lam, W.S.E. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 44-65. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num3/lam/default.html

Lantolf, J. (2000a). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second languagelearning. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lantolf, J. (2000b). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Learning, 33(2), 79-96.

Leander, K., & McKim, K. (2003). Tracing the everyday 'Sittings' of adolescents on the Internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 211-240.

Leather, J.H., & van Dam, J. (Eds.). (2003). Ecology of language acquisition. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Lee, N. (2004). Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the U.S. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 83-100. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num1/lee/default.html

McDonald, A., & McDonald, G. (1996). Intensive English programs newsletter, 1994-1996. Intensive English Programs Newsletter, 12-13.

Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2005). Foreign language learning with CMC: Forms of online instructional discourse in a hybrid Russian Class. System, 33(1), 89-105.

Meskill, C., & Ranglova, K. (2000). Curriculum innovation in TEFL: A study of technologies supporting socio-collaborative language learning in Bulgaria. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 20-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.

Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based activities and SLA: A conversation analysis research approach. Language Learning & Technology, 3(1), 75-87. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num1/negretti/index.html

Ochs, E. (1990). Indexicality and socialization. In G. Herdt, R. Shweder, & J. Stigler. (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 287-308). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

O'Dowd, R. (2003). Understanding the "other side": Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 118-144. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/odowd/default.html

Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 82-39. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/ortega/default.html

Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Rex, L., Green, J., Dixon, C., & the Santa Barbara Classroom Discourse Group. (1998). Critical issues: What counts when context counts?: The uncommon "common" language of literacy research. Journal of Literacy Research, 30(3), 407-433.

Schieffelin, B., & Ochs, E. (1986). Language socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15, 163-191.

Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (200l). Intercultural Communication: A discourse approach. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. TheModern Language Journal, 87(1), 38-57.

Sotillo, S. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82-119. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/sotillo/default.html

Sullivan, P. (2000). Playfulness as mediation in communicative language teaching in a Vietnamese classroom. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second languagelearning (pp. 115-131). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Thorne, S.L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language learning and technology, 7(2), 38-67. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/thorne/default.html

Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 82-99. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/TOYODA/default.html

Tudini, V. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 141-159. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/tudini/default.html van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordances: Social interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second languagelearning (pp. 133-153). New York: Oxford University Press.

A van Lier, L. (2002). Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ware, P. (2005). "Missed" communication in online communication: Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 64-89. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num2/ware/default.html

Ware, P., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 190-205.

Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7-26.

Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Warschauer, M. (2000). Online learning in second language classrooms: An ethnographic study. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern. (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 41-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Werry, C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47-63). Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Willett, J. (1995). Becoming first graders in an L2: An ethnographic study of L2 socialization. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 473-503.

Yu, T., & Wen, T. (2003). Crisis communication in Chinese culture. Asian Journal ofCommunication, 13 (2), 50-65.

Yum, J.O. (1997). The impact of Confucianism on intercultural relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. In L.A. Samover & R.E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural Communication: A reader (8th ed., pp. 77-88). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Eastment, David (n.d.) Technology-Enhanced Language Learning: Hype or Goldmine?. Online available at http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/square/ei11/tell.htm.

Fryer, Luke and Carpenter, Rollo (2006) Emerging Technologies: Bots as Language Learning Tools - Journal of Language Learning and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 3 September 2006, pp. 8-14. Online available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num

3/emerging/default.html.

Shin, Doug-Shin (2006) ESL Students' Computer-Mediated Communication Practices: Context Configuration - Journal of Language Learning and Technology. September 2006. Online available at http:/llt.msu.edu/.

LeLoup, Jean W. & Ponterio, Robert (2006) On the Net: Foreign Language Teachers' Greatest Hits" Journal of Language Learning & Technology. Vol. 10, No. 3, September 2006, pp. 3-7. Online available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num3/net/default.html.

Shin, Dong-Shin (2006) ESL Students' Computer-Mediated Communication Practices: Context Configuration. Journal of Language Learning & Technology, Vol. 10, NO. 3 September 2006 pp. 65-84. Online available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num3/shin/default.html.

Egbert, Joy; Paulus, Trena M. And Nakamichi, Yoko (2002) The Impact of CALL Instruction on Classroom Computer Use: A Foundation for Rethinking technology in Teacher Education - Journal of Language Learning & Technology. Vol. 6, No. 3 September 2002, pp. 108-126.

Leahy, Christine (1998) Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Context and Conceptualization written by Michael Levy. Online available at http://72.14.209.104/u/llt?q=cache:MpxR-HXjmlEJ:llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/pdf/levy.pdf+CALL&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=19&ie=UTF-8.

Literary Review of the Literature and Research of Computer Assisted Writing Learning: Applied Linguistics

Order Custom Essay On This Topic
Request A Custom Essay On This Topic Request A Custom Essay
Testimonials:
“I really do appreciate HelpMyEssay.com. I'm not a good writer and the service really gets me going in the right direction. The staff gets back to me quickly with any concerns that I might have and they are always on time.’’ Tiffany R
“I have had all positive experiences with HelpMyEssay.com. I will recommend your service to everyone I know. Thank you!’’ Charlotte H
“I am finished with school thanks to HelpMyEssay.com. They really did help me graduate college.’’ Bill K