Kirajavainen, M., Theakston, A, & Lieven, E. 2009. Can input explain children's me-for-I errors? Journal of Child Language, 36, 1091 -- 1114.
Rispoli, M. 1998. Me or My: Two Different Patterns of Pronoun Case Errors. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(2), 385 -- 393.
Rispoli, M. 2005. When children reach beyond their grasp: why some children make pronoun case errors and others don't. Journal of Child Language, 32, 93 -- 116.
Sag, I.A., Wasow, T., & Bender, E.M. 2003. Syntactic theory: a formal introduction. Center for the Study of Language and Information: Stanford, CA.
Schutze, C.T.R. 1997. INFL in Child and Adult Language: Agreement, Case, and Licensing. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Wechsler, S. 2010. What 'you' and 'I' mean to each other: Person indexicals, self ascription and theory of mind. Language, 86(2), 332 -- 365.
Van Rij, J., Van Rijn, H., & Hendriks, P. 2010. Cognitive architectures and languages acquisition: A case study in pronoun comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 37, 731 -- 766.
Zesiger, P., Zesiger, L.C., Arabatzi, M., Baranzini, L., Cronel-Ohayon, S., Franck, J., Frauenfelder, U.H., Hamman, C., & Rizzi, L. 2010. The acquisition of pronouns by French children: A parallel study of production and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(4), 571 -- 603.
Aarts, B. & McMahon, a. (2006). The handbook of English linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell;
Akmajian, a., Demers, R.A., Farmer, a.K., & Harnish, R.M. (2010). Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication. The MIT Press; 6th edition.
Brown, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. MA: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H.H. (1996). Using language. MA: Cambridge University Press.
Fabb, Nigel. (1997). Linguistics and literature: Language in the verbal arts of the world.
Schiffrin, D. (1988). Discourse markers. MA: Cambridge University Press.
Tannen, D. (2011). "Discourse analysis." Linguistic Society of America. Accessed on March 26, 2011: http://www.lsadc.org/info/ling-fields-discourse.cfm
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky (2000). Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. Step-by-Step: Essays on Minimalist
Syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Martin, r., D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (eds).
Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Chomsky (2001). On Nature and Language (Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi, ed.).
Chomsky (2001). Derivation by Phase. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Kenstovicz, Michael (ed).
Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. pp. 1-54.
Chomsky (2004). Beyond Explanatory Adequacy. Structures and Beyond. Belletti Adriana (ed).
The Cartography of Syntactic Structure Vol 3. Oxford: OUP. pp. 104-131.
Garcia, J. (2007). On the Nature and Status of the EPP. University of Connecticut. Retreived June 1, 2010 from http://homepages.uconn.edu/~juv07002/Villa-
Groat, Erich M. (1995). English expletives: A minimalist approach, Linguistic Inquiry. 26, 354-
Groat, Erich, and John O'Neil. 1996. Spell-Out at the LF-interface. In Minimal ideas, ed. W.
Abraham, S.D. Epstein, H. Thrainsson, and C.J.-W. Zwart, 113-139. Amsterdam,
Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lasnik, H (2001). A Note on the EPP, Linguistic Inquiry 32, 356-362.
Moro, Andrea (2006): "Some Notes on Unstable Structures," Ms., Universita San Raffaele di
Rosengren, I (2002). EPP: A syntactic device in the service of semantics,
Smith, E., Jonides, J. & Koeppe, R. et al. (1995). Spatial vs. object working memory: pet investigations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 7 (3): 337-356.
Introduction to Computational Linguistics (2006) Computer-Assisted Language Learning http://www.georgetown.edu/faculty/ballc/ling361/ling361_call.html.
Lusnia, Karen B. (1000) Teaching Teachers Long-Distance: A Paradigm-Shift for the Teacher-Planner in Mexico - Applied Linguistics. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language Teacher Education.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). Excerpts from discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.
Belz, J.A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/BELZ/default.html.
Belz, J.A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68-117. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/belz/default.html
Belz, J.A., & Kinginger, C. (2002). The cross-linguistic development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies. Canadian Modern Language Review/Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 59(2), 189-214.
Belz, J.A., & Kinginger, C. (2003). Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language Learning, 53(4), 591-647.
Belz, J.A., & Muller-Hartmann, A. (2003). Teachers as intercultural learners: Negotiating German-American telecollaboration along the institutional fault line. Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 71-89.
Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/default.html
Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22(1), 17-31.
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (1992). Rethinking context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gebhard, M. (2004). Fast capitalism and second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 245-265.
Gibson, J.J. (1979). An ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Grossman, P., Smagorinsky, P., & Valencia, S. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108(1) 1-29.
Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriated methodology and social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457-476. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://www.jstor.org/view/00267902/ap020557/02a00020/0?frame=noframe&userID=9455d2d1 amherst.edu/01cce440357b731034d3e4c10&dpi=3&config=jstor - http://www.jstor.org/view/00267902/ap02/
Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kinginger, C., Gourves-Hayward, A., & Simpson, V. (1999). A tele-collaborative course on French-American intercultural communication. French Review, 72(5), 853-866.
Kinginger, C. (2000). Learning the pragmatics of solidarity in the networked foreign language classroom. In J.K. Hall & L.S. Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 23-46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners' discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 143-166.
Ktter, M. (2003). Negotiation of meaning and codeswitching in online tandems. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 145-172. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/kotter/default.html
Kramsch, C. (1985). Classroom interaction and discourse options. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(2), 169-183.
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kramsch, C. (2000). Language and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kramsch, C. (Ed.). (2002). Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Kramsch, C., & Lam, E. (2003). The ecology of an SLA community. In J.H. Leather & J. van Dam. (Eds.), Ecology of language acquisition (pp. 141-158). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. (2002). Foreign language learning as a global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 83-100). London: Routledge.
Lam, W.S.E. (2000). Second language literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457-482.
Lam, W.S.E. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 44-65. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num3/lam/default.html
Lantolf, J. (2000a). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second languagelearning. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. (2000b). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Learning, 33(2), 79-96.
Leander, K., & McKim, K. (2003). Tracing the everyday 'Sittings' of adolescents on the Internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 211-240.
Leather, J.H., & van Dam, J. (Eds.). (2003). Ecology of language acquisition. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lee, N. (2004). Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the U.S. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 83-100. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num1/lee/default.html
McDonald, A., & McDonald, G. (1996). Intensive English programs newsletter, 1994-1996. Intensive English Programs Newsletter, 12-13.
Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2005). Foreign language learning with CMC: Forms of online instructional discourse in a hybrid Russian Class. System, 33(1), 89-105.
Meskill, C., & Ranglova, K. (2000). Curriculum innovation in TEFL: A study of technologies supporting socio-collaborative language learning in Bulgaria. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 20-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based activities and SLA: A conversation analysis research approach. Language Learning & Technology, 3(1), 75-87. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num1/negretti/index.html
Ochs, E. (1990). Indexicality and socialization. In G. Herdt, R. Shweder, & J. Stigler. (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 287-308). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
O'Dowd, R. (2003). Understanding the "other side": Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 118-144. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/odowd/default.html
Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 82-39. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/ortega/default.html
Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rex, L., Green, J., Dixon, C., & the Santa Barbara Classroom Discourse Group. (1998). Critical issues: What counts when context counts?: The uncommon "common" language of literacy research. Journal of Literacy Research, 30(3), 407-433.
Schieffelin, B., & Ochs, E. (1986). Language socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15, 163-191.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (200l). Intercultural Communication: A discourse approach. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. TheModern Language Journal, 87(1), 38-57.
Sotillo, S. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82-119. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/sotillo/default.html
Sullivan, P. (2000). Playfulness as mediation in communicative language teaching in a Vietnamese classroom. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second languagelearning (pp. 115-131). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Thorne, S.L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language learning and technology, 7(2), 38-67. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/thorne/default.html
Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 82-99. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/TOYODA/default.html
Tudini, V. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 141-159. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/tudini/default.html van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordances: Social interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second languagelearning (pp. 133-153). New York: Oxford University Press.
A van Lier, L. (2002). Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ware, P. (2005). "Missed" communication in online communication: Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 64-89. Retrieved July 28, 2006, at http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num2/ware/default.html
Ware, P., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 190-205.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7-26.
Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Warschauer, M. (2000). Online learning in second language classrooms: An ethnographic study. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern. (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 41-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Werry, C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47-63). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Willett, J. (1995). Becoming first graders in an L2: An ethnographic study of L2 socialization. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 473-503.
Yu, T., & Wen, T. (2003). Crisis communication in Chinese culture. Asian Journal ofCommunication, 13 (2), 50-65.
Yum, J.O. (1997). The impact of Confucianism on intercultural relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. In L.A. Samover & R.E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural Communication: A reader (8th ed., pp. 77-88). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Eastment, David (n.d.) Technology-Enhanced Language Learning: Hype or Goldmine?. Online available at http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/square/ei11/tell.htm.
Fryer, Luke and Carpenter, Rollo (2006) Emerging Technologies: Bots as Language Learning Tools - Journal of Language Learning and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 3 September 2006, pp. 8-14. Online available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num
Shin, Doug-Shin (2006) ESL Students' Computer-Mediated Communication Practices: Context Configuration - Journal of Language Learning and Technology. September 2006. Online available at http:/llt.msu.edu/.
LeLoup, Jean W. & Ponterio, Robert (2006) On the Net: Foreign Language Teachers' Greatest Hits" Journal of Language Learning & Technology. Vol. 10, No. 3, September 2006, pp. 3-7. Online available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num3/net/default.html.
Shin, Dong-Shin (2006) ESL Students' Computer-Mediated Communication Practices: Context Configuration. Journal of Language Learning & Technology, Vol. 10, NO. 3 September 2006 pp. 65-84. Online available at http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num3/shin/default.html.
Egbert, Joy; Paulus, Trena M. And Nakamichi, Yoko (2002) The Impact of CALL Instruction on Classroom Computer Use: A Foundation for Rethinking technology in Teacher Education - Journal of Language Learning & Technology. Vol. 6, No. 3 September 2002, pp. 108-126.
Leahy, Christine (1998) Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Context and Conceptualization written by Michael Levy. Online available at http://184.108.40.206/u/llt?q=cache:MpxR-HXjmlEJ:llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/pdf/levy.pdf+CALL&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=19&ie=UTF-8.
Literary Review of the Literature and Research of Computer Assisted Writing Learning: Applied Linguistics