Search Our Essay Database

Essay Instructions: Essay question1
Provide an argument in support of Kantian ethics and an arguement against Kantian ethics.

Essay question2
God is the being that created all those being that didn't create themselves. Does God exist? Explain your answer.

Please write an essay answering these question above. Maximum 3 pages required.

Essay Instructions: This is a Group assignment and my contribution is to write about:Kantian Ethical Analysis.
1.It requires Introduction and brief explanation of Kantian ethics.
2.See Cavico and Mujtaba Business Ethics text chapter 8 for discussion of Kantian ethics ( this is the book we're using).
3.Statement of Kant's Ethics Principle- The Categorical Imperative.
4. Application of the Three Tests of the Categorical Imperative to topic ( Universal "Law" Test: Kingdom of ends Test: Agent-Receiver Test)
5. Kantian Moral Conclusion.
In addition i need to select an additional third ethical theory for analysis... which i've selected to be....an Ethical analysis of The Pollution Credit Plan. I need to do The Moral Conclusion pursuant to additional third ethical theory, and Overall Conclusion to Ethics section as a whole (and transition to Social Responsibility section).. Please note that this project is about BP Oil Spill, but what i noted above is the part i'm responsible for.

Essay Instructions: This is Religion class. Please do not copy and paste. If you do that, I will fail this course. When you need it, please put references. This paper is due on next monday thus I need this paper by saturday so I can review on sunday. This is what my professor mentioned about this paper and topic. :
- Please describe the major tenets of two of these theories/principles(Belmont Principles, CIOMS Principles, CBPR theory, utlitarianism, liberal individualism, Kantian ethics, virtue theory, communitarianis(community-based theory),emergent ethics (postmodern perspectives), or ethics of care. Please provide no more than two examples of how these theories/principles were evident in a case study.
The text books are :
(1) Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J. 2001, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Oxford University Press.
(2) Minkler, M. and Nina Wallerstein, Community-Based Participatory Research for Health, Josey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 2003

Essay Instructions: 1. Analyze the ethics of your subject’s actions. Address the following issues. Your paper should be in outline/narrative format.
a. Describe the illegal or unethical behavior.
b. How long (or how many times) did the subject engage in this behavior?
c. Describe your subject’s actions in terms of ethics and social responsibility.
d. Use five ethics theories discussed in Cheeseman (2010), pp. 667-670: (a) ethical fundamentalism, (b) utilitarianism, (c) Kantian ethics, (d) Rawl’s social justice theory, and (e) ethical relativism.
e. Which theory do you most subscribe to in this case, and why?
f. Were there any codes of ethics that were clearly violated?
g. Evaluate your subject’s actions in terms of the five schools of social responsibility.
h. Evaluate your subject’s actions in terms of the theories of social responsibility in Cheeseman (2010), p. 670-674: (a) maximizing profits, (b) moral minimum, (c) stakeholder interest, and (d) corporate citizenship.


2. Research your subject’s criminal trial. Answer the following questions/address the following issues. Your paper should be in outline/narrative format.
a. Describe the illegal behavior.
b. In what type of court was your subject tried?
c. What charges were brought against your subject in the original indictment?
d. Provide key details about the trial and provide a timeline of key trial events.
e. Did your subject enter into a plea bargaining agreement? If so, to what charges did he/she plead guilty? If not, what were the final charges? Did they differ from those in the original indictment? What was the verdict?
f. What was the sentence? Do you feel it was fair? Justify your position.
g. Did your subject appeal? If so, on what grounds did he/she base the appeal?
h. Did your subject have mens rea and actus reus? Justify your position.
i. What constitutional protections does your subject have?

OR

If there was no criminal trial in your scandal, then discuss the following:
a. What is a criminal trial (as contrasted with a civil trial)?
b. Why there was no criminal trial in your scandal?
c. What, if anything, was considered to be illegal behavior?
Note: if any criminal charges were filed against your leader(s), even though they never came to an actual trial, this should be discussed in Part 4.

Customer is requesting that (johnfitz44) completes this order.