Search Our Essay Database

Essay Instructions: answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English spelling and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be a minimum of one (1) single-spaced page to a maximum of two (2) pages in length; refer to the "Assignment Format" page for specific format requirements.

According to Immanuel Kant, morality is grounded in absolute moral rules that we must adhere to under all circumstances. One such moral rule is the prohibition against lying.

Answer the following.
Explain why Kant believed there cannot be any exceptions to the duty not to lie, regardless of the consequences. (30 points)

Explain why, according to the general moral principle of the Categorical Imperative, lying could not be a universal law. (30 points)

Do you agree with Kant about not lying? Why or why not? (15 points)

Under what circumstances, if any, do you believe it would be personally ethical for you to lie? (15 points)
Total possible points of 100 include ten (10) points for organization and use of language, including grammar and punctuation.

Essay Instructions: Just Answer this questions. Use 2 pages to answer all the questions, and please use a lot of details.


1.What are Immanuel Kant’s classifications of imperatives and how are they positioned within his brand of deontological ethics?

2.What defines virtue according to Aristotle and how does the concept of habit relate to this definition?

3.What is the role of the individual within John Stuart ill’s consequentialist system, and does personality, character, or virtue get taken into account when rendering a utilitarian judgment?


4.Describe how the “goldenmean” works within Aristotle’s theory on virtue ethics. How does subjective and objective judgment relate to this concept?


5.Discuss the dialectic that exists between a consequentialist/utilitarian ethical system and a deontological ethical system in terms of their a priori or a posteriori characteristics.


6.Describe why John Stuart Mill’s ethical theory of “Utilitarianism” is a hedonistic system. Why does Mill focus on the qualitative over the quantitative when determining the hedonistic characteristics of a moral dilemma?


7.What is Immanuel Kant’s position on the concept of happiness when determining morality, and what is the lens of value that establishes the moral from the immoral in his ethical system?

Essay Instructions: Write a paper in which you explain the views of Immanuel Kant and Eduard Hanslick on the formalist and modernist approach to art and music. Apply the ideas of formalism as found in the two texts (will be provided) to the musical resources provided (the power points slide), and demonstrate how those resources are to be understood according to the texts.

Required Materials:
(1) The excerpt from Kant's Critique of Judgement provided
(2) Hanslick's on the Beautiful in Music provided
(3) The power points slide provided
(4) May use music work to illustrate the theory

I will upload those files, please contact me with any questions.
There are faxes for this order.

Essay Instructions: In a unified, coherent and well-developed paper of 4 pages, please compare and contrast the understandings of freedom developed by Martin Luther and Immanuel Kant.

you should establish the unity of the paper by means of a clear, concise thesis (very important!!!!!!!). you should establish the coherece of your paper by means of a logically structured argument in support of that thesis, and you should base the development of that argument in substantial quotation!!!!!!!!!!! from the analysis of Luther''s "preface to the epistle of st. paul to te Romans and Kant''s "an answer to the question: what is enlightenment

i have provided you with all the materials that are necessary. i have faxed over martin luther''s essay as well as kant''s.

the essays are not difficult to understand but they must be read to formulate the paper.

please do not use any outside sources whatsoever. they will not be accepted.

"succesSful paper will be free of errors in grammar, syntax, punctuation and spelling. you may use any system of citation you choose , so long as it is thorough , clearand consistent.

some basic guidelines......

4 pages
double spaced
1 inch margins
12 point font


in comparing and contrasting the different Views of freedom please do not state all of luthers points of view and then kants separatly.
they must be intertwined so if both believe in faith as a contributing factor please state both of their oppinions when discussing faith

i think it would be pretty hElpful to make a chart of luthars views and kants views comparing their beliefs on such things as ..the basic problem for both of their views
for luthar discuss sin, law, faith, grace, and good works

for kANT ADDRESS IMMATURITY , SELF RELIANCE, CIVAL VS INTELLECTUAL SPHERES. PUBLIC VS PRIVATE...ETC..

ANY BACKGROUND ON THE AUTHORS LIFE IS NOT RELEVANT , STRICLY KEEP IT TO DISCUSSING THE VIEWS PERTAINING TO FREEDOM, IT MAY EVEN BE HELPFUL TO START WITH A SHORT INTRO AND RIGHT INTO THE THESIS SO AS TO MAKE OBVIOUS THE THSIS OF THE PAPER.

PLEASE USE A LOT OF QUOTATIONS , ITS THE ONLY WAY TO BACK UP YOUR POINTS , SO MY TEACHER SAYS

THE WORKS CITED PAGE SHOULD LIST THE TWO ESSAYS I HAVE FAXED ONLY

THANK YOU SO MUCH , HOPE IT ES EASY FOR YOU
SAMMY

ANY QUESTION EMAIL ME ANY TIME AT:

OR CALL 24 HOURS A DAY AT
There are faxes for this order.