Historiography Essays and Research Papers

Instructions for Historiography College Essay Examples

Title: Sallust

  • Total Pages: 15
  • Words: 3836
  • References:10
  • Citation Style: MLA
  • Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: Historiography on Sallust.

Only use secondary sources, no primary.
You must include at least 10 secondary sources (scholarly books, monographs and articles in scholarly journals, excluding book reviews and general textbooks!).

In your paper, you must explain what other historians have thought, said and written about your chosen historian. You must explain how historical interpretations of your historian have changed over time, and you must explain the differences between various “schools” of historical interpretation regarding your historian. In other words, you need to compare and contrast what other historians have argued about your writer, and you need to think like a historian about why these interpretations have changed over time.

In addition to the usual formula of introduction, body and conclusion, historiographical papers should be organized as follows:

Section 1: The historians life, including an analysis of the historical and intellectual movements of the time.
A. Influences upon the historian
1. Education
2. Historical Events
B. Professional career, positions held.

Section 2: The historians historical Contributions
A. Predecessors
B. Major Contributions
c. Influence and Successors

Section 3: Analysis of one or more historians works.
A. Theme(s) and reason(s) for writing
B. Its purpose and scope
C. Its influence

The Historian: Sallust
The Book: The Jugurthine War/ The Conspiracy of Catiline
Penguin Classics

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
References:

Works Cited

Bonta, Steve. "Cicero, Catiline, and Conspiracy: Vying for Control, Lucius Catiline Conspired to Become Rome's Monarch, While Cicero Worked to Expose and Thwart His Plans and Keep Rome's Republic Alive," the New American 13 Dec. 2004, Questia, 25 Feb. 2009 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5008426347.

Lessons of Rome: The Rise and Fall of the Roman Republic Provides Lessons that Hint at Flaws in Modern Political Policies," the New American 21 Feb. 2005, Questia, 25 Feb. 2009 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5008754603.

Boyd, Barbara Weiden. "Conspiracy Narratives in Roman History," CLIO 36.3 (2007), Questia, 25 Feb. 2009 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5023230375.

Holland, Tom. "What Bush Can Learn from the Romans: A Republic Founded on High Ideals of Liberty Becomes a Great World Power and Then Drifts into Empire. Sounds Familiar? It All Happened 2,000 Years Ago," New Statesman 25 Aug. 2003, Questia, 25 Feb. 2009 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5002018579.

Hornblower, Simon, and Tony Spawforth. "Velleius Paterculus.," Who's Who in the Classical World. 2000. 28 Fe. 2009. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1O10VelleiusPaterculus.html.

Howatson, M.C., and Ian Chilvers. "Sallust." The Concise Oxford Companion to Classical Literature. 1996 http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1O9-Sallust.htm.

Miller, Peter Benson. "By the Sword and the Plow: Theodore Chasseriau's Cour Des Comptes Murals and Algeria," the Art Bulletin 86.4 (2004), Questia, 26 Feb. 2009 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5008256248.

Nodes, Daniel J.. "On Renaissance Commentaries," Renaissance Quarterly 59.3 (2006), Questia, 25 Feb. 2009 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5022918969.

Sallust." Encyclopedia of World Biography. 2004. 28. Feb. 2009. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G2-3404705700.html.

Stradling, Robert. "The Death of Don Juan; Murder, Myth and Mayhem in Madrid," History Today May 1993, Questia, 25 Feb. 2009 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5000175444.

Thayer, Bill. "Sallust on LacusCurtius." 20 Feb 2009 http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Sallust/home.html.

Wolverton, Joe. "The Founding Fathers & the Classics: The Stream of Classical History Was One of the Primary Tributaries of American Political Thought at the Time of the Founding," the New American 20 Sept. 2004, Questia, 25 Feb. 2009 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5007718401.

Zumbrunnen, John. "Courage in the Face of Reality": Nietzsche's Admiration for Thucydides," Polity 35.2 (2002), Questia, 25 Feb. 2009 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5001926350.

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: Historiography paper History Canadian Foregin Policy Topic Alaska Boundary dispute Specifics Students required write a 5 6 page historiography chosen topic Historiography essentially history writing research a historical subject

  • Total Pages: 6
  • Words: 2088
  • Works Cited:15
  • Citation Style: MLA
  • Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: Historiography paper for the History of Canadian Foregin Policy.

Topic: Alaska Boundary dispute

Specifics: Students will be required to write a 5-6 page brief historiography of the chosen topic. Historiography is essentially the history of writing and research on a particular historical subject. In other words, how have historians throughout the years interpreted particular subjects, events, etc. What methods have they used, what sources have they relied upon, what theories or ideological perspectives have guided them in that research and writing? Because history is really nothing other than the ideas of historians themselves, it is profoundly influenced by the worlds those historians inhabit. And so the history of particular topics tends to be writen anew according to the questions and issues that dominate their worlds. Examine and comment on how previous historians/scholars have interpreted the chosen topic in the grand narrative of the history of Canadian foreign policy. Pay particular attention to particular schools of thought/interpretation as well as to how methodological and interpretative changes in the discipline of history itself affected the study of the topic.

In other words: write about what's been said on the topic (in general), where the lines of debate are, where do the authors line up in the debate (pro/anti), interpretative frameworks (idealist/Marxist/realist/liberal/internationalist) quickly group the authors together under these categories, what is the status of the conversation, what is the overall sense the sources are going with, what are the different points of view (American, Canadian, Russian), what are they striving to achieve? what are their underlying goals (defence policy/trade policy).

Thesis for this paper (general idea): more like a road map of where you're going. Group authors together into general categories and explain them.

Essay format for this paper.

**You must use the references included with the term paper already written and attached. You may also use other references if necessary, but the references from the paper must be used.**

**I have already written the term paper for this topic, I will attach it. This historiography is based on this paper**

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Works Cited:

References

Alaskan Boundary Tribunal. (Facsimile) British Possessions in North America (portion). From Mr. Arrowsmith's Map of North America. Pinkerton's Modern Atlas. 1818. Alaska Boundary Tribunal. Baltimore: Hoen & Co, 1903.

Balch, Thomas. The Alaska frontier. Philadelphia: Allen, Lane and Scott, 1903.

Batten, Donna. Gale encyclopedia of American law. Detroit: Gale, 2010

Bowal, Peter. The International Court of Justice. Alberta: Legal Resource Centre of Alberta Ltd. (LRC), 2005.

Hincks, Francis. The boundaries formerly in dispute between Great Britain and the United States a lecture. Montreal: J. Lovell, 1885.

Hodgins, Thomas. The Alaska-Canada boundary dispute, under the Anglo-Russian treaty of 1825; the Russian-American Alaska treaty of 1867; and the Anglo-American conventions of 1892, 1894 and 1897. An historical and legal review. Toronto: W. Tyrrell, 1903

Kaufman, Will. Britain and the Americas culture, politics, and history: a multidisciplinary encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABC- CLIO, 2005.

Kohn, Edward. This kindred people Canadian-American relations and the Anglo-Saxon idea, 1895-1903. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2004.

Lewis, William. The Alaskan boundary dispute from an American point-of-view. New York: Abe 1899.

Mills, David. The Canadian view of the Alaska boundary dispute. Ottawa: Govt. Print. Bureau, 1899.

Nugent, Walter. Habits of empire a history of American expansion. New York: Vintage Books, 2009.

Royle, Stephen. Company, crown and colony the Hudson's Bay Company and territorial endeavour in western Canada. London: I.B. Tauris, 2011.

Scidmore, Eliza.The disputed boundary between Alaska and British Columbia. New York: Century, 1891.

White, James. Boundary disputes and treaties. Toronto: Glasgow, Brook & Co, 1914.

United States. Joint report of commissioners appointed under article 1 of the convention between the United States of America and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the delineation of the boundary line between the United States and the Dominion of Canada, dividing Alaska from British Columbia, together with the approved minute of council thereon, of 25th February, 1896. New York: Abe, 1896.

Chicago Format. https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/717/01/

William Lewis, The Alaskan boundary dispute from an American point-of-view, (New York: Abe, 1899).

Will Kaufman, Britain and the Americas culture, politics, and history: a multidisciplinary encyclopedia, ( Santa Barbara: ABC- CLIO, 2005).

David Mills, The Canadian view of the Alaska boundary dispute, (Ottawa: Govt. Print. Bureau, 1899).

Francis Hincks, The boundaries formerly in dispute between Great Britain and the United States a lecture, (Montreal: J. Lovell, 1885).

Thomas Hodgins, The Alaska-Canada boundary dispute, under the Anglo-Russian treaty of 1825; the Russian-American Alaska treaty of 1867; and the Anglo-American conventions of 1892, 1894 and 1897. An historical and legal review, (Toronto: W. Tyrrell, 1903).

Thomas Hodgins, The Alaska-Canada boundary dispute, under the Anglo-Russian treaty of 1825; the Russian-American Alaska treaty of 1867; and the Anglo-American conventions of 1892, 1894 and 1897. An historical and legal review, (Toronto: W. Tyrrell, 1903).

Will Kaufman, Britain and the Americas culture, politics, and history: a multidisciplinary encyclopedia, ( Santa Barbara: ABC- CLIO, 2005).

Edward Kohn. This kindred people Canadian-American relations and the Anglo-Saxon idea, 1895-1903. (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2004).

Walter Nugent. Habits of empire a history of American expansion. (New York: Vintage Books, 2009).

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: lincoln or jef davis

  • Total Pages: 7
  • Words: 2536
  • Bibliography:0
  • Citation Style: APA
  • Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: Historiography project: Examine the interpretation of one specific topic by more than one author and from more than one period of writing.
Definition: Historiography is the study of how written history is created and evolves, based on a critical examination of the underlying sources, how the authentic materials were selected and used, and how the author’s syntheses of material was developed into a narrative, that should be able to stand against the test of critical research methods. Primary source material is original documentation created by an eyewitness, participant or author of an original document. Secondary source materials are those created by newspaper accounts developed from interviews, commentary by others on an event or person, books/articles/papers written by anyone who was not a participant in the event or is not autobiographic.
Goals: Through this project, you will be introduced to the basic methodology of written history. The project will help you develop a larger view of the study of history, in order to have a better understanding of how history is “constructed” and/or as preparation for in-depth study of historiography in HIS440. That will be accomplished by moving you away from the memorization / repeating of names, dates and places or from stopping with one author’s view as authority - to a view that is broader, more developed, critical and analytical. To reach that ultimate goal, you will tackle smaller goals by:
Examining how the author of the text under study treated the selected topic (favorably/unfavorably).
b. Reviewing the primary and secondary sources which the author used to develop his/her presentation, seeking to determine if he/she presented the information as in the original or if it has been altered, slanted or taken out of context of time, place and events.
c.Then find other resources on the same topic to see what primary and secondary sources were used and if they differ from the text under study. Even if a second author used the same source material, you should analyze how that material is used and presented to shape the ultimate perspective on the subject.
d. Briefly examine how depictions of the subject have changed or been modified through time or location.
The ultimate goal is find the most accurate sources relating to the original event, in order to develop the least unambiguous knowledge about the subject. In doing so, you should begin to develop the skills of identifying bias in writing, and preconceptions within yourself. While eliminating all bias is not truly possible, limiting, isolating and coming to terms with how both an author’s and our own bias greatly affect one’s perspective on and understanding of an event or person in history.
Assignment:
Select one of the seven characters who figured prominently in the Civil War and whom you find of special interest.
Abraham Lincoln
Jefferson Davis
Examine how McPherson (2001), generally treated that figure, (use your notes and the index in the back of the text to focus your research).
Review the major events related to the person selected and corresponding description(s), depictions and incidents listed in the index. For each, examine the notes, footnotes and references McPherson cited in order to determine:
What primary and secondary source material did he use?
Are there hints about any method that he may have used to shape the information?
What was the context of the incident(s)? Did McPherson keep that context clear – allowing the events/persons to “speak” for themselves?
Determine what materials were primary sources (i.e., eye witnesses statements, personal accounts) and which were secondary (i.e., accounts by others of the events who were not participants).
If possible review the original material, particularly the Official Records. The Official Records of the Civil War can be electronically word searched and examined at: http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/moa/browse.monographs/waro.html
Examine two to three other sources concerning the selected figure looking for differing opinions, accounts, depictions etc, in opposition or support of McPherson’s interpretation and explain the differences or corroboration. (You should look beyond Wikipedia, and not use it as one of the two to three sources consulted.)
As a result of the research and reading, you should be able to produce a paper which explains briefly the nature of the character examined, how the person has been depicted by McPherson and others and give an informed opinion as to why or how those depictions were developed and how they deviate/comply with the primary source material.
Instructor Notes:
Be selective determining how far you are going to take the subject. Those four figures loom large in the text and in the Civil War and may present a larger project than you care to do or have time to produce. If you have questions, please contact your instructor for suggestions about narrowing or approaching the subject in a practical manner. For example, if examining Lincoln, you might select one of the categories listed by McPherson in the index on pp. I-15—16, such as Lincoln – “as commander in chief” and focus only upon the data used to shape the presentation in that selection of references from the McPherson text.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Bibliography:

References

Brick-Turin, a.S. (2004). Jefferson Davis, Confederate president. The Historian, 66(3), 585-

Cooper, W.J. (2003). Jefferson Davis: The essential writings. New York: The Modern Library.

Davis, J. (1881, 1971 reprint). The rise and fall of the Confederate government. New York: Da

Capo Press.

Dirck, B.R. (2002). Posterity's blush: Civil liberties, property rights, and property confiscation in the Confederacy. Civil War History, 48(3), 237-238.

Eckenrode, H.J. (1923). Jefferson Davis: President of the South. New York: Macmillan.

McElroy, R. (1937). Jefferson Davis: The unreal and the real. New York: Harper & Brothers

Publishers.

Mcpherson, J.M. (2004). Crossroads of freedom: Antietam. New York: Oxford University

Press.

Miers, E.S. (1971). Foreword to the rise and fall of the Confederate government.

Proceedings of First Confederate Congress, 284 in Sutherland at 260.

Sutherland, D.E. (2002). Guerrilla warfare, democracy and the fate of the Confederacy. Journal of Southern History, 68(2), 259-260.

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: Historiography historians James McPherson Ordeal By Fire book Alan T Nolan book Lee Considered General Robert E. Lee civil War History What primary secondary sources develop presentation seeking determine presented information original altered slanted context time place events How materials presented shape ultimate perspective General Lee's

  • Total Pages: 2
  • Words: 936
  • Sources:3
  • Citation Style: APA
  • Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: Historiography as described by historians James McPherson on his Ordeal By Fire book and Alan T. Nolan on his book.. Lee Considered: General Robert E. Lee and civil War History.

What primary and secondary sources they used to develop their presentation, seeking to determine if they presented the information as in original or it has been altered, slanted or taken out of context of time, place and events

How were the materials used and presented to shape the ultimate perspective on General Lee's.

How's Lee been depicted by these authors and others and give an informed opinion as to why or how those depictions were developed and they deviate/comply with primary source.

Was Lee treated by authors favorably/unfavorably?

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Sources:

References

McPherson, J.M. (1982). Ordeal by fire: the Civil War and Reconstruction. New York: Knopf: .

Morton, P. (n.d.). An Interview with James M. McPherson. Bookslut | Issue 107 | April 2011. Retrieved April 4, 2011, from http://www.bookslut.com/features/2007_05_011057.php

Nolan, A.T. (1991). Lee considered: General Robert E. Lee and Civil War history. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Order Custom Essay On This Topic
Request A Custom Essay On This Topic Request A Custom Essay
Testimonials:
“I really do appreciate HelpMyEssay.com. I'm not a good writer and the service really gets me going in the right direction. The staff gets back to me quickly with any concerns that I might have and they are always on time.’’ Tiffany R
“I have had all positive experiences with HelpMyEssay.com. I will recommend your service to everyone I know. Thank you!’’ Charlotte H
“I am finished with school thanks to HelpMyEssay.com. They really did help me graduate college.’’ Bill K