Search Our Essay Database

Essay Instructions: Organize your Critical Evaluation essay on the global war on terror with the following materials in order:


1. Introduction.
2. Background.
3. Body
4. Conclusion.

In your middle ground argument, you are expected to do the following:
? Introduce an issue and explain why a middle position is appropriate at this time.
? Substantially and accurately summarize each extreme position with special emphasis on what makes each position impractical.

? Evaluate each position, identifying the shortcomings of each view.
? Prove why your position is more practical.

Essay Instructions: Follow the instruction as it is below:

I will send you 3 sample briefing papers for you to understand the structure and format I want for my briefing paper.

Here is the question:

You are a national security adviser for a new Australian Prime Minister (this
can be of any of mainstream political persuasion you choose, ie Coalition,
Labor or Green).
In preparation for her first meeting with the National Security Committee of
Cabinet (NSCC) she has asked that a briefing book be developed on a range
of security issues that will impact Australia in the coming decade. While you
have delegated most of the entries to your staff, you are to write the one for
what you consider to be the most important security of the day (ie on one of
the following broad topics but you will need to further refine the topic):

? Nuclear Deterrence
? Ballistic Missile Defence
? Nuclear Strategy
? Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction
? The Global War on Terrorism
? Regional Conflict or Intervention

(I choose the The Global War on Terrorism so write about this one)

You realize the PM needs to be brought up to speed with a concise primer on
the topic. There is no need to dwell on the history of the issue. Nor is the PM
going to sit still for a list of every incident that has occurred. The PM does
need to know something of the background of the issue before she can
assess the policy options that will be presented to her in the NSCC.
The briefing note should be structured as follows (It is designed so that the
reader can stop at any section, based on their own personal knowledge
about the topic, and still get the key information about your
recommendations):
? There should be a summary at the beginning outlining the key elements
of the topic as well as address the importance of the topic (including why
you consider it to be the most important security issues).
? The next section should list your key recommendations, the rationale for
action and also canvas alternative actions (including inaction).
? The last section of the report needs to provide the background of the
issue, the implications of the action and any other information you feel is
relevant.
The report should be a broad policy statement and does not need to go into
minute detail (for example the forces to be deployed if applicable). As
always, there is a research aspect to the assignment and full referencing is
required.


Here is the MARKING CRITERIA you need to follow

MARKING CRITERIA
What the Assessor will be looking for when
marking this assignment:
GRADUATE ATTRIBUTE
? How well have the subject and sources
been understood?
? acquisition of, and ability to
work with, a systematic
body of knowledge, based
on the highest standards of
scholarship and research
? Have the subject matter and sources
been treated fairly? Is the note
sufficiently critical? Are counter-policies
addressed?
? understanding of the
professional, social,
economic and cultural
contexts of the discipline
area
? How adequate are the sources? Is the
range of sources sufficient? Has the
material been well integrated?
? identifying, gathering,
retrieving and working with
textual, graphic and
numerical information
? Are the style, grammar and general use of
English adequate? Is the briefing note
professionally presented?
? communication, orally and
in written form, across a
range of contexts
? Has the assignment been submitted on
time?
? personal organisation and
management
? Have the most appropriate types of
sources been used? Have online
technologies such as the Library?s
databases been used to their most
effectiveness?
? harnessing information and
communication technology
? Is the briefing note?s structure sensible
and logical?
? critical analysis, problem
solving, and creative
thinking
? Are the recommendations original? ? commitment to independent
and lifelong learning
? Does the assignment demonstrate
awareness of any relevant ethical, social
responsibility or cultural diversity issues?
? awareness of ethics, social
responsibility and cultural
diversity
? Is an international perspective
demonstrated?
? appreciation of international
perspectives in a global
environment

Please use academic sources, such as books, journals and articls.


There are faxes for this order.

Essay Instructions: This assignment requires students to think critically, analyze and investigate an issue related to terrorism, and present an informed and well-researched paper. Students must select a thesis that applies in general terms and principle to the stated course objectives. This paper counts for 40% of your final course grade. Students must upload (NLT week 8) completed paper to through the ASSIGNMENT section saved as a Microsoft WORD document and labeled: Research(last name).doc. Note 1: Papers must conform to the APA style writing standards located in the Policies section below. Papers not conforming to APA style guidelines will be returned un-graded. Note 2: Papers must be 10-12 pages in length, single-sided, double-spaced

Course Objectives
. Recite the history of terrorism and interpret the differences between state sponsored, political, religious, and nationalist terrorism.
2. Describe sponsorship of terrorism, including all types of political and social support, and broadly define the range of terrorist assets and resources, including the terrorism-media relationship.
3. Differentiate between domestic, international and trans-national terrorism, and differentiate conventional from unconventional terrorist tactics.
4. Defend systematic eradication of terrorism vis à vis U.S. foreign and domestic counterterrorism policies and evaluate the feasibility of winning the Global War on Terror.
5. Differentiate between terrorist victims and targets, and relate the pillars and essential elements of terrorism, including the wide range of terrorist motives.
6. Identify the characteristics of US counter-terrorism policy and Israeli counter-terrorism policy.
7. identify and understand the characteristics of the Al Qaeda terrorist network.

Essay Instructions: I would like to request Tsiyasse again.

This research paper will discuss the economics of the Marshall Plan. After WWII and with the start of the Cold War, the United States took a lead role in the reconstruction of Europe. Discuss the pros and cons of The Marshall Plan on the economics of Europe after WW11. The Marshall Plan has been discussed in both positive and negative lights and this paper will discuss these and what this means in the Post Cold War, post 9/11 Global War on Terrorism World.