George Bush Essays and Research Papers

Instructions for George Bush College Essay Examples

Title: George Bush announced New Way Forward Iraq January 2007 In early 2009 Army slowly started increase troop strength Afghanistan President Obama December 2009 announced plans send additional 30 000 troops fight Taliban Afghanistan

  • Total Pages: 4
  • Words: 1360
  • Works Cited:5
  • Citation Style: APA
  • Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: George Bush announced the ?New Way Forward? for Iraq in January 2007. In early 2009 the Army slowly started to increase troop strength in Afghanistan, and President Obama in December of 2009 announced plans to send an additional 30,000 troops to fight the Taliban in Afghanistan. Due to the previous continuous years of war and the strain of multiple deployments on Soldiers, the recruiting and retention rates had dropped significantly to the point that recruiting could not keep up with the need for Soldiers. The impending surges in Iraq and Afghanistan now projected the need for even more recruits. In order to meet the needs for new recruits the Army changed their manning practices. The new practices seemed to be opposed to the Army?s policy of recruiting those that would fit their values based force. The Army was forced into an ethical dilemma of either meeting the numbers for recruiting, or not being able to support the surge. Ultimately the Army started to recruit those that previously did not meet its requirements to serve such as felons. They also put pressure on units to retain those whose behavior did not fit into the values based Army.
How did the Army defend lowering standards to recruit or retain those least likely to produce the values based force they required?
What Army policies were changed to lower the standards and increase the recruiting and retention?
What has been the impact at an individual level and on the military in general of the policy changes?
What would have been an alternative to lowering the standards that would have still met the requirements of a surge?
Was there anything that each individual Soldier could have done to decrease the pressure on the recruiting system in meeting the needs of the surge?

Please use a strict APA format for composition and citing while avoiding plagiarism.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Works Cited:

References

Alvarez, L. (2008, April 22). Army and marine corps grant more felony waivers. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/22/washington/22waiver.html?_r=0

Associated Press. (2008, April 21). More felons allowed to enlist in army, marines. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/id/24243460/

Bedno, S.A.,M.C.U.S.A., Lang, C.E.,M.C.U.S.A., Daniell, William E, M.D., M.P.H., Wiesen,

A.R.,M.C.U.S.A., Datu, B., & Niebuhr, D.W.,M.C.U.S.A. (2010). Association of weight at enlistment with enrollment in the army weight control program and subsequent attrition in the assessment of recruit motivation and strength study. Military Medicine, 175(3), 188-93.

Lawrence, J.K., & Sean, E.D. (2007). An all-volunteer army? recruitment and its problems. PS,

Political Science & Politics,40(3), 467-471,456.

Yamane, G.K.,U.S.A.F.M.C.S.F.S. (2007). Obesity in civilian adults: Potential impact on eligibility for U.S. military enlistment. Military Medicine, 172(11), 1160-5.

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: Comparing and Contrasting Approaches to Foreign Policy of George Bush and Barack Obama

  • Total Pages: 7
  • Words: 2231
  • Bibliography:4
  • Citation Style: MLA
  • Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: Approach a recent, ongoing or current world political event as a realist and as an idealist, comparing and contrasting the two approaches. OR (2) Discuss the foreign policy positions of former President George Bush, Jr. and President Barack Obama in terms of realism and idealism. Are they realists or idealists or some combination? The paper must be 8-10 pages, double-spaced, 1 inch margins, 12 point type font. All material not your own must be supported by references.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Bibliography:

References

Bardes, B.A., Schmidt, S.W., & Shelley, M.C. (2012). American government and politics today: the essentials, 2011-2012. Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Callahan, D. (1994). Between two worlds: Realism, idealism, and American foreign policy

after the Cold War. New York: Harper Collins.

Crawford, R.M.A. (2000). Idealism and realism in international relations: Beyond the discipline. London: Routledge.

Schmidt, S.W., Shelley, M.C., & Bardes, B.A. (2011). American government and politics today: Brief edition, 2010-2011. United States: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: George Bush and the Gulf War

  • Total Pages: 2
  • Words: 617
  • Sources:0
  • Citation Style: APA
  • Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: Read Primary Resources from Chapter 33. Below is an article for primary resources from Chapter 33. Then go back over the primary sources since 1898 that emphasize foreign relations or military actions.


George Bush, Address to the Nation Announcing Allied Military Action in the Persian Gulf (1991)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just 2 hours ago, allied air forces began an attack on military targets in Iraq and Kuwait. These attacks continue as I speak. Ground forces are not engaged.

This conflict started August 2d when the dictator of Iraq invaded a small and helpless neighbor. Kuwait--a member of the Arab League and a member of the United Nations--was crushed; its people, brutalized. Five months ago, Saddam Hussein [President of Iraq] Saddam Hussein started this cruel war against Kuwait. Tonight, the battle has been joined.

This military action, taken in accord with United Nations resolutions and with the consent of the Untied States Congress, follows months of constant and virtually endless diplomatic activity on the part of the United Nations, the United States, and many, many other countries. Arab leaders sought what became known as an Arab solution, only to conclude that Saddam Hussein was unwilling to leave Kuwait. Others traveled to Baghdad in a variety of efforts to restore peace and justice. Our Secretary of State, James Baker, held an historic meeting in Geneva, only to be totally rebuffed. This past weekend, in a last-ditch effort, the Secretary-General of the United Nations went to the Middle East with peace in his heart--his second such mission. And he came back from Baghdad with no progress at all in getting Saddam Hussein to withdraw from Kuwait.

Now the twenty-eight countries with forces in the Gulf area have exhausted all reasonable efforts to reach a peaceful resolution--have no choice but to drive Saddam from Kuwait by force. We will not fail.

As I report to you, air attacks are underway against military targets in Iraq. We are determined to knock out Saddam Hussein's nuclear-bomb potential. We will also destroy his chemical-weapons facilities. Much of Saddam's artillery and tanks will be destroyed. Our operations are designed to best protect the lives of all the coalition forces by targeting Saddam's vast military arsenal. Initial reports from General Schwarzkopf are that our operations are proceeding according to plan.

Our objectives are clear: Saddam Hussein's forces will leave Kuwait. The legitimate government of Kuwait will be restored to its rightful place, and Kuwait will once again be free. Iraq will eventually comply with all relevant United Nations resolutions, and then, when peace is restored, it is our hope that Iraq will live as a peaceful and cooperative member of the family of nations, thus enhancing the security and stability of the Gulf.

Some may ask: Why act now? Why not wait? The answer is clear: The world could wait no longer. Sanctions, though having some effect, showed no signs of accomplishing their objective. Sanctions were tried for well over five months, and we and our allies concluded that sanctions alone would not force Saddam from Kuwait.

While the world waited, Saddam Hussein systematically raped, pillaged, and plundered a tiny nation, no threat to his own. He subjected the people of Kuwait to unspeakable atrocities--and among those maimed and murdered, innocent children.

While the world waited, Saddam sought to add to the chemical weapons arsenal he now possesses, and infinitely more dangerous weapon of mass destruction--a nuclear weapon. And while the world waited, while the world talked peace and withdrawal, Saddam Hussein dug in and moved massive forces into Kuwait.

While the world waited, while Saddam stalled, more damage was being done to the fragile economies of the Third World, emerging democracies of Eastern Europe, to the entire world, including to our own economy.

The United States, together with the United Nations, exhausted every means at our disposal to bring this crisis to a peaceful end. However, Saddam clearly felt that by stalling and threatening and defying the United Nations, he could weaken the forces arrayed against him.

While the world waited, Saddam Hussein met every overture of peace with open contempt. While the world prayed for peace, Saddam prepared for war.

I had hoped that when the United States Congress, in historic debate, took its resolute action, Saddam would realize the could not prevail and would move out of Kuwait in accord with the United Nation resolutions. He did not do that. Instead, he remained intransigent, certain that time was on his side.

Saddam was warned over and over again to comply with the will of the United Nations: Leave Kuwait, or be driven out. Saddam has arrogantly rejected all warnings. Instead, he tried to make this a dispute between Iraq and the United States of America.

Well, he failed. tonight, twenty-eight nations--countries from five continents, Europe and Asia, Africa, and the Arab League--have forces in the Gulf area standing shoulder to shoulder against Saddam Hussein. These countries had hoped the use of force could be avoided. Regrettably, we now believe that only force will make him leave.

Prior to ordering our forces into battle, I instructed our military commanders to take every necessary step to prevail as quickly as possible, and with the greatest degree of protection possible for American and allied service men and women. I've told the American people before that this will not be another Vietnam, and I repeat this here tonight. Our troops will have the best possible support in the entire world, and they will not be asked to fight with one hand tied behind their back. I'm hopeful that this fighting will not go on for long and that casualties will be held to an absolute minimum.

This is an historic moment. We have in this past year made great progress in ending the long era of conflict and cold war. We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order--a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful--and we will be--we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders.

We have no argument with the people of Iraq. Indeed, for the innocents caught in this conflict, I pray for their safety. Our goal is not the conquest of Iraq. It is the liberation of Kuwait. It is my hope that somehow the Iraqi people can, even now, convince their dictator that he must lay down his arms, leave Kuwait and let Iraq itself rejoin the family of peace-loving nations.

Thomas Paine wrote many years ago: "These are the times that try men's souls." Those well-known words are so very true today. But even as planes of the multinational forces attack Iraq, I prefer to think of peace, not war. I am convinced not only that we will prevail but that out of the horror of combat will come the recognition that no nation can stand against a world united. No nation will be permitted to brutally assault its neighbor.

No president can easily commit our sons and daughters to war. They are the Nation's finest. Ours is an all-volunteer force, magnificently trained, highly motivated. The troops know why they're there. And listen to what they say, for they've said it better than any President or Prime Minister ever could.

Listen to Hollywood Huddleston, marine lance corporal. He says, "Let's free these people, so we can go home and be free again." And he's right. The terrible crimes and tortures committed by Saddam's henchmen against the innocent people of Kuwait are an affront to mankind and a challenge to the freedom of all.

Listen to one of our great officers out there, Marine Lieutenant General Walter Boomer. He said: "There are things worth fighting for. A world in which brutality and lawlessness are allowed to go unchecked isn't the kind of world we're going to want to live in."

Listen to Master Sergeant J. P. Kendall of the 82d Airborne: "We're here for more than just the price of a gallon of gas. What we're doing is going to chart the future of the world for the next 100 years. It's better to deal with this guy now than five years from now."

And finally, we should all sit up and listen to Jackie Jones, an army lieutenant, when she says, "If we let him get away with this, who knows what's going to be next?"

I have called upon Hollywood and Walter and J. P. and Jackie and all their courageous comrades-in-arms to do what must be done. Tonight, America and the world are deeply grateful to them and to their families. And let me say to everyone listening or watching tonight: When the troops we've sent in finish their work, I am determined to bring them home as soon as possible.

Tonight, as our forces fight, they and their families are in our prayers. May God bless each and every one of them, and the coalition forces at our side in the Gulf, and may He continue to bless our nation, the United States of America.



Below are questions that need to be answered in the research paper.

How does Bush's justifications for action and his vision of the world political order measure up to previous justifications and visions?
How consistent have the ideas (not necessarily the actions) of American foreign policy been throughout the twentieth century? And was the Gulf War a sign of the New World Order after the fall of Communism or a continuation of old, but valid, ideas?

Write a brief paper (500-800 words) that summarizes the discussion of the above topic.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: George Bush terrorism natural disasters occuring

  • Total Pages: 1
  • Words: 355
  • References:0
  • Citation Style: MLA
  • Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: Discuss some issue of personal, local, national and its concern and its importance -- specific topics: George Bush, terrorism, natural disasters occuring (hurricane katrina),

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Order Custom Essay On This Topic
Request A Custom Essay On This Topic Request A Custom Essay
Testimonials:
“I really do appreciate HelpMyEssay.com. I'm not a good writer and the service really gets me going in the right direction. The staff gets back to me quickly with any concerns that I might have and they are always on time.’’ Tiffany R
“I have had all positive experiences with HelpMyEssay.com. I will recommend your service to everyone I know. Thank you!’’ Charlotte H
“I am finished with school thanks to HelpMyEssay.com. They really did help me graduate college.’’ Bill K