Copyright Essays and Research Papers

Instructions for Copyright College Essay Examples

Title: What characteristics amendments copyright law HK ensure rights protected freedom expression upheld This paper media regulation ethics

  • Total Pages: 4
  • Words: 1695
  • Bibliography:4
  • Citation Style: APA
  • Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: What characteristics should amendments to the copyright law (in HK) have to ensure that rights are protected and freedom of expression is upheld?
This is the paper for media regulation and ethics.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Bibliography:

Reference

Contracting Parties (2012) "WIPO Copyright Treaty (Total Contracting Parties: 89)." World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved 14 July 2012 from http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/trtdocs_wo033.html

N.W. Nethanel,(2008) 'Is copyright the "engine of free expression"?' In Copyright's Paradox, Oxford University Press. Retrieved 14 July 2012 from http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/lpbr/subpages/reviews/netanel0608.htm

Samuels, Edward. 1989. "The Idea-Expression Dichotomy In Copyright Law" 56 TENNESSEE LAW REVIEW Retrieved 14, July 2012 from 321-463.http://encyclo.findlaw.com/1610book.pdf

Wendy J. Gordon and Robert G. Bone (1999) "1610 COPYRIGHT" Boston University School of Law, Retrieved 14 July 2012 from http://encyclo.findlaw.com/1610book.pdf

WIPO Copyright Treaty (2012). World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved 14, July 2012 from http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/trtdocs_wo033.html

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: These reflection essays based downloading movies TV series trough a program called Vuze violates Washington DC copyright laws American University laws I demand essay professionally written simply answer questions based readings attached

  • Total Pages: 6
  • Words: 1888
  • Sources:0
  • Citation Style: None
  • Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: These will be self-reflection essays based on downloading movies and TV series trough a program called "Vuze" which violates the Washington DC copyright laws as well as the American University laws. I do not demand the essay to be professionally written, but simply answer the questions based on the readings attached.
The instructions are as follow:

A. Copyright Basics
Read Copyright Basics
Read the relevant portions of the U.S. Copyright Statute.
Complete Copyright Quiz (Circle answer). Score quiz - look up answers on the sheet provided. For each question, write down if you answered the quiz question right or wrong. If you answered the question RIGHT, write a brief explanation of how you knew the answer (in other words, where had you learned that information). If you got the answer WRONG, write a brief explanation about if the information surprised you or if it changes the way you think about the fact? You have to address each question. Do not leave any blank or skip any questions.

B. University Policies
Read the University?s Computer Use and Copyright Policy - Write a 1 pg. paper on why and how your actions violated the University?s policies.

C. Copyright Myths
Read 10 Big Myths About Copyright Explained - Write a 1 pg. reaction paper about one of the myths.
Write a 3 pg. reflection paper on how illegal file sharing of music/movie files on the Internet affects the artists. How does it affect society? Yourself?

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Sources:

References

"American University Computer Use and Copyright Policy." Retrieved online: http://www.american.edu/loader.cfm?csModule=security/getfile&pageid=2609353

Copyright School: https://www.american.edu/counsel/upload/Copyright-Assignment.pdf

Templeton, Brad. "Ten Big Myths About Copyright Explained." Retrieved online: http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: Copyright Law

  • Total Pages: 25
  • Words: 9076
  • References:30
  • Citation Style: MLA
  • Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: This project will look at the paralegal's role in he music industry. Specifically, it will focus on copyright law in the US and how the paralegal is involved in the copyright aspect of the music industry. It will look at the difference between common law copyright and statutory copyright. It needs to look at the duration of copyright protection in the US, and what happens if a copyright is infringed. The paper will also look at the various statutes that are part of the Copyright Act of 1976 and will then move into the 21st Century with a look at the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The paper will look at specific cases that may apply to the study, such as Eldred v. Ashcroft. The paper also needs to include examples of the documents necessary for a music artist to submit a copyright application, synopsis of the cases that apply to the study, and any other information that can be obtained online and in textbooks and journals. The Bluebook System of Citation must be used to site all legal sources. Otherwise, the MLA needs to be used for the rest. The paper must include an outline, introduction with thesis statement, literature review, abstract, main body, endnotes, and a bibliography. Page numbers are required on the bottom of each page except the first page and are not required on the title page, abstract, outline and end notes. Some of the sources must include case law.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
References:

Bibliography

NG, Rachel. Music Paralegals. May/June 2005. Legal Assistant Today. 27 September 2008 http://www.legalassistanttoday.com/issue_archive/features/feature1_mj05.htm

PatentOffice.com. Copyright Transference and duration. .2008. PatentOffice.com 29 September 2008. http://www.patentoffice.com/copyright-attorney.cfm

Schleimer, J. And Freundlich, K. (2001). Criminal Prosecution of the Online "File Sharing." August 2001. Journal of Internet Law. 29 September 2008. http://www.schleimerlaw.com/criminalprosfilesharearticle.htm.

US Copyright Office. U.S. Copyright Office Forms. 13 September 2008. U.S. Copyright Office. 29 September 2008. http://www.copyright.gov/forms/.

US Copyright Office. United States Copyright Office: A Brief Introduction and History. 13 September 2008. U.S. Copyright Office. Circular 1a. 29 September 2008.

< http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1a.html>

US Copyright Office. Copyright Office Basics. January 2008. U.S. Copyright Office. Circular 1. 29 September 2008. < http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#hlc

US Copyright Office. The Uruguay Round Agreements Act of 1994. January 2008. U.S. Copyright Office. Circular 3. 29 September 2008.

< http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ03.html#uruguay>

US Legislature Cited

17 U.S.C. § 101. 29 September 2008.

17 U.S.C. § 102 (b) 29 September 2008.

17 U.S.C. § 106 (a) 29 September 2008. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000106-000-.html

17 U.S.C. § 107. 29 September 2008. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107-000-.html

17 U.S.C. § 201 ( c ) 29 September 2008. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000201-000-.html

17 U.S.C. § 303 (a). http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000303-000-.html

17 U.S.C. § 304 29 September 2008. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000304-000-.html

17 U.S.C. § 501. 29 September 2008. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000501-000-.html

17 U.S.C. § 704. 29 September 2008. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000704-000-.html

Copyright Act of 1976, Pub.L. 94-553, 90 Stat. 2541, § 401(a) (October 19, 1976)

Family Entertainment and Copyright

Act of 2005. 29 September 2008. < http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/pl109-9.html>

The Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 (BCIA), Pub.L. 100-568, 102 Stat. 2853, 2857.

THOMAS.net. Digital Millennium Copyright Act. H.R. 2281. Library of Congress. 29 September 2008.

< http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z-c105:H.R.2281.ENR>

Cases Cited

A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001)

Baker v. Selden, 101 U.S. 99 (1880)

Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, 510 U.S. 569 (1994).

Computer Assocs. Int'l, Inc. v. Altai, Inc., 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14305 (2d Cir. 1992)

Eldred v. Ashcroft (01-618) 537 U.S. 186 (2003)

239 F.3d 372, affirmed.

LA Westerman Co. v. Dispatch Printing Co., 249 U.S. 100 (1919)

Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc., 547 F. Supp. 999 (N.D. Ill. 1982)

Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 252 F. 3d 1165 (11th Cir. 2001)

United States v. LaMacchia, 871 F.Supp. 535, 545 (D. Mass. 1994).

Venegas Hernandez v. Sonolux Records. Nos. 03-2014, 03-2015 (First Circuit June 7, 2004).

White-Smith Music Pub. Co. v. Apollo Co., 209 U.S. 1 (1908)

END NOTES

Rachel NG. "Music Paralegals." May/June 2005. Legal Assistant Today. 27 September 2008

NG

NG

NG

NG

NG

NG

US Copyright Office. United States Copyright Office: A Brief Introduction and History. 13 September 2008. U.S. Copyright Office. Circular 1a. 29 September 2008.

< http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1a.html>

US Copyright Office. United States Copyright Office: A Brief Introduction and History. 13 September 2008. U.S. Copyright Office. Circular 1a. 29 September 2008.

< http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1a.html>

Copyright Act of 1976, ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_law_%28United_States%29

White-Smith Music Pub. Co. v. Apollo Co., 209 U.S. 1 (1908)

The Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 (BCIA), ? http://assembler.law.cornell.edu/usc-cgi/get_external.cgi?type=pubL&target=100-568 o "http://assembler.law.cornell.edu/usc-cgi/get_external.cgi?type=pubL&target=100-568" ?Pub.L. 100-568?, 102 Stat. 2853, 2857.

US Copyright Office. The Uruguay Round Agreements Act of 1994. January 2008. U.S. Copyright Office. Circular 3. 29 September 2008.

< http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ03.html#uruguay>

US Copyright Office. Copyright Office Basics. January 2008. U.S. Copyright Office. Circular 1. 29 September 2008. < http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#hlc

THOMAS.net. Digital Millennium Copyright Act. H.R. 2281. Library of Congress. 29 September 2008.

< http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z-c105:H.R.2281.ENR>

Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005. 29 September 2008. < http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/pl109-9.html>

Schleimer, J. And Freundlich, K. Criminal Prosecution of the Online "File Sharing." August 2001. Journal of Internet Law. 29 September 2008. .

Schleimer and Freundlich,

Schleimer and Freundlich,

Schleimer and Freundlich,

Baker v. Selden, 101 U.S. 99 (1880)

Computer Assocs. Int'l, Inc. v. Altai, Inc., 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14305 (2d Cir. 1992)

Copyright Act of 1976, ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_law_%28United_States%29

Copyright Act of 1976, ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_law_%28United_States%29

US Copyright Office. United States Copyright Office: A Brief Introduction and History. 13 September 2008. U.S. Copyright Office. Circular 1a. 29 September 2008.

< http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1a.html>

Copyright Act of 1976, ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_law_%28United_States%29

PatentOffice.com. Copyright Transference and duration. .2008. PatentOffice.com 29 September 2008. http://www.patentoffice.com/copyright-attorney.cfm

PatentOffice.com.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/17_U.S.C.

US Copyright Office. United States Copyright Office: A Brief Introduction and History. 13 September 2008. U.S. Copyright Office. Circular 1a. 29 September 2008.

< http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1a.html>

US Copyright Office. United States Copyright Office: A Brief Introduction and History. 13 September 2008. U.S. Copyright Office. Circular 1a. 29 September 2008.

< http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1a.html>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/17_U.S.C.

US Copyright Office. U.S. Copyright Office Forms. 13 September 2008. U.S. Copyright Office. 29 September 2008. http://www.copyright.gov/forms/.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/17_U.S.C.

Venegas Hernandez v. Sonolux Records. Nos. 03-2014, 03-2015 (First Circuit June 7, 2004).

LA Westerman Co. v. Dispatch Printing Co., 249 U.S. 100 (1919)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/17_U.S.C.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-1292.ZS.html

Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin Co., ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_citation

Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc., ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_citation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_Illinois

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/17_U.S.C.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_17_of_the_United_States_Code

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/108.html

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/110-122.html

THOMAS.net. Digital Millennium Copyright Act. H.R. 2281. Sect 512. Library of Congress. 29 September 2008.

< http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z-c105:H.R.2281.ENR>

A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_citation

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00001498-000-.html

US Copyright Office. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. December 1998. . U.S. Copyright Office. 29 September 2008. < http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf>

Order Custom Essay On This Topic

Title: Legal paper relating to copyrights vs peer to peer file transfer

  • Total Pages: 20
  • Words: 5802
  • Works Cited:0
  • Citation Style: MLA
  • Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: The topic is for a law class and should focus on the copyright vs. peer to peer file sharing.

The outline is the following:

1.. Definition of copyright.
> 1.. Purpose of this rule
> 2.. Why it is important
> 2.. The SONY Case against betamax case.
> 1.. Elements of the case and the reason why the courts ruled
the way they did.
> 3.. Peer to Peer file sharing
> 1.. What is it, how is done.
> 4.. Napster Case
> 1.. What were the elements of the case, and why the court
decided to rule against Napster.
> 5.. Why are sites such as audiogalaxy exiting when they perform
the same as Napster.
> 1.. What are the elements you need to create a site as
Napster, that will not land you in court, the same as Napster.
> 6.. Discuss the impact that Hollywood is suggesting to restrict
copyright violation:
> 1.. Currently Hollywood is lobbying the manufactures to
install chips that will restrict people from downloading movies
and MP3 files. Is this right? If I purchase a book and lend it
out to some one should I be held as violating copyright?
> 2.. May be the courts should consider the idea that a person
who makes a copy of tape, but does not distribute should not be
held liable? Currently people copies of their favorite movies
when it comes on TV or cable. Should we start to track and
monitor all those people and what would be the benefit?
> 3.. The fact that the courts do not go after people who
subscribed to Napster makes one believe they themselves believe
that if people are not making money with these downloads then they
should not prosecuted.

The paper should have 7 bibligraphic sources (4 of these sources should be from the internet) and 8 footnootes.

[ Order Custom Essay ]

[ View Full Essay ]

Excerpt From Essay:
Works Cited:

References

Bedell, Doug (1999, August).COMING TO A PC NEAR YOU: First-run movies begin toroll into homes, raising chills in Hollywood., The Dallas Morning News, pp 1F.

Peer-to-Peer File Sharing and Copyright Law after Napster (Accessed 4-3-2002) by Fred von Lohmann Peer-to-Peer question and answer forum appears here. http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/Napster/20010227_P2P_Copyright_White_Paper.html

Peer to Peer File Sharing (Accessed 4-3-2002)

http://www.altavista.com/r-ck_sm=3e9b157a&ref=20080&uid=32e4ce39892dc428&r=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theconnection.org%2Farchive%2F2001%2F03%2F0305a.shtml

Piracy Issues (accessed 4 -3-2002)

http://www.howstuffworks.com/napster4.htm

Author not available, Senate Committee Passes Copyright Bill., Newsbytes News Network, 05-01-1998.

____(2000, August). Hollywood wins in video hacker case., The Toronto Star.

John Roska; Land Of Lincoln Legal Assistance Foundation, SOME WORKS AUTOMATICALLY HAVE COPYRIGHT PROTECTION., St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 09-02-1999, pp 2.

Marsh, Ann (1999, November). Welcome to Hollyweb., Forbes Magazine, pp 060.

Kim S. Nash, Copyright issues haunt IS on 'net., Computerworld, 01-06-1997, pp 1.

Sony vs. Betamax (Accessed 4-3-2002)

http://www.altavista.com/r-ck_sm=b3d7d54c&ref=20080&uid=59b4471319c9a86d&r=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msnbc.com%2Fmodules%2FDigitalMusic%2F

Author not available, Consumer Information: Copyright Law of the United States., The World Almanac and Book of Facts 2000, 01-01-1999.

Author not available,... sensible copyrights., USA Today, 12-02-1997, pp 13A.

AOL Guilty of Copyright Infringement By Lori Enos E-Commerce Times April 13, 2000 http://www.altavista.com/r-ck_sm=42ff9f7b&ref=20080&uid=398f8833672b6b22&r=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ecommercetimes.com%2Fnews%2Farticles2000%2F000413-5.shtml

Author not available, Consumer Information: Copyright Law of the United States., The World Almanac and Book of Facts 2000, 01-01-1999.

SONY VS BETAMAX (Accessed 4-3-2002)

http://www.altavista.com/r-ck_sm=b3d7d54c&ref=20080&uid=59b4471319c9a86d&r=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msnbc.com%2Fmodules%2FDigitalMusic%2F

Peer to Peer File Sharing (accessed 4-3-2002)

http://www.altavista.com/r-ck_sm=3e9b157a&ref=20080&uid=32e4ce39892dc428&r=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theconnection.org%2Farchive%2F2001%2F03%2F0305a.shtml

IAAL*: Peer-to-Peer File Sharing and Copyright Law after Napster by Fred von Lohmann Peer-to-Peer question and answer forum appears here. http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/Napster/20010227_P2P_Copyright_White_Paper.html

Piracy Issues http://www.howstuffworks.com/napster4.htm

Bedell, Douglas (1999, August). COMING TO A PC NEAR YOU: First-run movies begin toroll into homes, raising chills in Hollywood The Dallas Morning News;

____(2000, August). Hollywood wins in video hacker case

The Toronto Star.

AOL Guilty of Copyright Infringement By Lori Enos E-Commerce Times April 13, 2000 http://www.altavista.com/r-ck_sm=42ff9f7b&ref=20080&uid=398f8833672b6b22&r=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ecommercetimes.com%2Fnews%2Farticles2000%2F000413-5.shtml

Order Custom Essay On This Topic
Request A Custom Essay On This Topic Request A Custom Essay
Testimonials:
“I really do appreciate HelpMyEssay.com. I'm not a good writer and the service really gets me going in the right direction. The staff gets back to me quickly with any concerns that I might have and they are always on time.’’ Tiffany R
“I have had all positive experiences with HelpMyEssay.com. I will recommend your service to everyone I know. Thank you!’’ Charlotte H
“I am finished with school thanks to HelpMyEssay.com. They really did help me graduate college.’’ Bill K