Search Our Essay Database

Essay Instructions: Topic:
A measure of both security and privacy are necessary government objectives for the freedom of all Canadians. The September 11th , 2001 attacks resulted in a re-organization of Canada's safety and security infrastructures. In particular, many of Canada?s border activities now have a tighter focus on national security objectives.
Using appropriate course content, language and new research materials, describe this shift toward national security commenting on its potential threat to the privacy of Canadians. Can these two important objectives be reconciled?
Please Note: Remember that privacy is guarded both through overarching government policy (Privacy Commissioner), legislation and constitutionally via the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.**use these sources**
Also, please use relatively new resources and new and upto date newspaper articles etc. If use article please use peer reviewed articles. In addition, please use endnotes and properly cite them.
Thank You

Essay Instructions: Please use 3 arguements (1 per paragraph) from the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and argue how prisoners shouldn't have such rights and freedoms and why, use cases to back up arguements as well as other referances, use of internet and books are good as well. please contact me if you have any questions

Essay Instructions: Apart from the Reasonable Limit Clause, the inclusions of the Notwithstanding Clause In the Canadian charter of Rights and Freedoms stands as perhaps the Charter's most stark reminder of the often competitive, sometimes contentious and rarely static historical federal relationship between the provinces and Ottawa. With that in mind, in a carefully crafted essay, explain the constitutional purpose served by the Notwithstanding Clause as well as the legislative rational behind its insertion into the Canadian Charter of Rights. Given when, why and how the Notwithstanding Clause can potentially be invoked, why is the original intent of the clause and the resultant legacy of its usage so commonly regarded by critics and observers alike as a clear indication of section 33' s controversial nature.

Essay Instructions: The Assignment:
Explain the distinction between "substantive" and "procedural" due process. How has this distinction manifested itself in Canada under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? Why is section 7 arguably the most important legal right in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
______________________
aprox. 1 quotation per paragraph
no more than 2 parenthetical citations per paragraph
no footnotes
1200 words max.
______________________
Suggested references:

1)Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
2)R v. Mogentaler [1988] 1 S.C.R.30

In-paper reference for research material I will be sending via fax (I will fill in the information in full on the reference page):
1) MacAlister, David (2008)
2) Sharpe & Roach (2003)
There are faxes for this order.