Essay Instructions: The research paper should be as follows:
2700 words and a Reference page.
12 pt. Courier New or Times New Roman font.
Should contain an APA-style formatted title page.
All pages should be numbered.
Should contain 10 sources (minimum) with no more than three web sites.
APA style citation for the American Psychological Association is reguired.
I have a rough idea of that the research will be discussing the benefits of bio technology. With a thesis statement a long the lines of that
biotechnology have greater benefits and contributions to humanity in a very fundamental way; improving the quality of life, and extending lives. This thesis statement can be modified and rewritten in a better way.
the paper has to be focused on an area for which a possible, credible solution or explanation can be derived
This is what the professor said about how the paper should look like,
As you know, all research seeks to answer a "research question."
For example, if one were researching & writing about prescribing medications to elementary-school children, this topic could be phrased in the form of a question:
"Could medicating elementary-school children be damaging to their future development?" "
You can use the investigative reporter's words "what, why, when, where, who, and how" as starting points for brainstorming your questions. You can also use the words "would, should, or could" in formulating your question.
What's the research-question your paper will seek to answer and defend?
Here & now, please phrase your research-topic in the form of a research-question, using the words "would, should, or could."
I am at the biomedical Engineering field that is why I chose this subject.
Las but not least,
please cite all the sources you use, my school is very sensitive about the "academic integrity" they have a soft ware called “Turitin”, that compares 70% of the words in the paper. I am saying this because I have been caught twice now for using borrowed ideas without citing them. That is because a different company wrote the essays for me. And I am very concerned that next time can be a risk for loosing my school.
Please make sure that the information you use does not exit in any database, or the software will find it .
I have faith that you service is better that what I have experienced before, that is why I am hear purchasing the essay. Also I wanted a quote on a 100 page thesis for MBA.
Excerpt From Essay:
Total Pages: 5 Words: 1536 References: 4 Citation Style: MLA Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you describe a current ethical health care issue such as the following: transplant allocation; refusal of care, such as a blood transfusion; patient noncompliance with treatment; biomedical research; patient dumping; compliance with new health care requirements; and so on. Examine and evaluate how each of the four major ethical principles can be applied to this issue. 1.1 Examine the legislative impact on health care delivery.
1.2 Explain the role and impact of governmental regulatory agencies.
Please read the uploaded books and use them.
Excerpt From Essay:
Essay Instructions: Request for writer's username: dlray
Describe the future of biomedical information resources, based in part on information resources for all medical specialties and subspecialties. Focus paper on electronic information sources, or include both print and electronic resources. Discussion might address the development, use, and evolution of controlled vocabularies; specialized bibliographic citation databases; full-text resources; Web-based "one stop shopping" resources; or other relevant topics as you see it. This is an opinion piece.
Excerpt From Essay:
Essay Instructions: As one of the “applied” ethics, Biomedical Ethics is neither simply a theory to be learned in philosophy
books nor a set of codes to be learned in a technical training course ??" it is a discipline that moves between theory and
practice. Thus, one of the key methodologies in Biomedical Ethics is the method of “Case Studies,” which presents
an analysis of the ethical questions arising from real-world situations as they are faced by healthcare professionals,
patients, and families. This approach requires a careful foundation in ethical theories and concepts, and a careful
exploration of the ethically relevant facts of the case at hand. Indeed, theories often arise from the attempt to
systematize our intuitions of what is right and wrong in particular cases, and reciprocally new cases require that we
re-evaluate our theories! Your first written assignment will thus be an analysis of a case.
In this assignment, you are required to include 4 sections corresponding to the following list:
A) Introduction: Identify the main topic of concern using the terminology, concepts, and arguments learned
from our course videos, readings, podcasts, and website. Also, clearly identify the “morally relevant
facts” of the case, and any key concepts or facts that are important.
B) Argument(s) for side #1: Identify the strongest argument(s) you can think of for ONE side of the debate.
Be sure to include the reasons supporting the argument(s).
C) Argument(s) for side #2: Identify the strongest argument(s) you can think of for the OTHER side of the
debate, or the best objections to side #1. Again, give reasons and go beyond simply repeating the story.
D) Recommendation/Conclusion: In your opinion and based on your reasoning and arguments, what
ought to happen in this particular case, and what general policy should be supported? Be “objective” and
find the best way between the two sides, or give a reason to choose one over the other. This is your
“considered” or “critical” opinion, not just your unreflective beliefs.
My Case Study:
2) The Case of Scott Starson
In 1999, Scott Starson was involuntarily committed to a psychiatric hospital in Ontario after he had been
found “not criminally responsible” for two counts of uttering death threats. Starson had a history of psychiatric
disorders, and had recently been diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Starson recognized his disorder and voluntarily
underwent psychotherapy, but he refused any medication for the condition. Starson, a gifted theoretical physicist,
believed the medications would destroy his ability to pursue his research, which in his opinion was the only thing
that gave his life meaning. Physicians and officials believed Mr. Starson was unable to genuinely appreciate the
value of treatment, so they petitioned to have his treatment decisions transferred to a surrogate. The petition was
granted, but Mr. Starson appealed in a case that made its way up to the Supreme Court of Canada, which overturned
the decision and asserted that Mr. Starson was not incompetent to make medical decisions. A patient, they argued, is
not required to make a decision that is in their “best interests” as determined by the physician, and therefore they are
allowed to disagree with a treatment recommendation. Mentally ill patients, then, must also be allowed to make
medical decisions that disagree with doctors unless a clear inability has been demonstrated. Explore this case and the
consequences it represents for the concept of informed consent and the notion of competence in Canada. Should
doctors be allowed to impose treatments in such cases?
My book that we have to use:
Kluge, Eike-Henner W., ed. Readings in Biomedical Ethics: A Canadian Focus. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall: Toronto, 2005.
There are faxes for this order.
Excerpt From Essay:
I really do appreciate HelpMyEssay.com. I'm not a good writer and the service really gets me going in the right direction. The staff gets back to me quickly with any concerns that I might have and they are always on time.
I have had all positive experiences with HelpMyEssay.com. I will recommend your service to everyone I know. Thank you!
I am finished with school thanks to HelpMyEssay.com. They really did help me graduate college..