Total Pages: 2 Words: 419 Works Cited: 0 Citation Style: APA Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: Will upload article: Meleis, A.I., & Dracup, K. (2005). The case against the DNP: History, timing, substance, and marginalization. The online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 10(3), 1-8.
A reflective response (NOT summary) to the reading of the article. Do not have to reproduce content. Instead, shape a commentary on it, starting from your own line of questioning...should be exploratory-"thinking on paper"- should aim to display independent thinking. I know I paid for 2 pages but only need 275-300 words (about 1 page typed, double spaced). Be clear to what you are addressing. Entries are formal pieces of writing free of grammar and spelling errors. Use APA for citing article.
***Will upload Objectives****
Excerpt From Essay:
Total Pages: 2 Words: 580 Bibliography: 2 Citation Style: MLA Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: Archive Proposal (50 points)- This is a 1-2 page (double-spaced) proposal for the text/discourse/archive you will use for your paper over the course of the semester: Background / Context Essay, Methodology Essay, Analysis Essay, and Final Draft. Select an artifact that not only interests your but also that you can defend as unique or significant. I suggest that you limit yourself to a specific “text” such as the text of a speech, film, documents, music, advertisements, literary works and so on. Selection of a more diffuse text, archive, or discourse requires a more careful defense of the boundaries of your selection. I will ask you to rework this proposal if I feel that your topic selection requires significant adjustments. The proposal should address the following questions: What is the text or archive? What research questions drive this inquiry? Why is this text or archive unique or significant? Include a works cited page.
THE ARTIFACT I CHOSE IS THE MOVIE, A.I. Artificial Intelligence. Yet if you have any suggestion like better artifact to develop the paper, let me know.
Excerpt From Essay:
Total Pages: 6 Words: 1955 Sources: 2 Citation Style: APA Document Type: Essay
Essay Instructions: Describe the interaction between the creator and the created in the following works: R.U.R. by Karel Capek and Steven Spielberg’s film A.I.. What sort of relationship do the makers or facilitators of artificial have with their creations? In what sense are those artificial entities reflections of their creators?
Customer is requesting that (freelancewriter) completes this order.
Excerpt From Essay:
Total Pages: 2 Words: 684 References: 1 Citation Style: MLA Document Type: Research Paper
Essay Instructions: Androids and the Mind/Body Problem
Note: In order to fulfill this assignment you need to have read the Star Trek synopsis and/or episode found in the Reading & Study folder along with chapter 3 of the Hasker text. If you have not done so, please stop now and read that material.
Science fiction literature often raises philosophical issues and is a great source for philosophical speculation. This is especially true for the mind/body problem. For example, it is common in science fiction literature to encounter androids. An android is a robot which resembles a human being in appearance and behavior. Examples of androids in science fiction books, television programs, or films are numerous (Star Trek, Star Wars, Aliens, Terminator, A.I., I, Robot, etc.). In reality, many computer scientists are currently working in the area of ?artificial intelligence? or machines that can ?think for themselves.? Many computer scientists believe this is the first step in creating these androids of the future and that in time the distinction between man and machine will be practically erased. These scientists speculate that androids with super-computer brains will have thoughts, beliefs, feelings, and desires just like humans. Therefore, some argue that they will also have the same rights, responsibilities, and privileges that all humans have and should be treated as thus.
Do you see problems with this view of the future? Do you think machines can ever become persons?
Your thread should be a minimum of 500 words.
SYNOPSIS: STAR TREK EPISODE
?The Measure of a Man? 
Most of us are aware that the television series Star Trek was about a starship, the Enterprise, whose mission was to explore the galaxy. This ship was part of a larger organization known as Starfleet. Serving as a Lt. Commander on board the ship was an android named Data. Data was an extremely advanced and unique android even by the standards of 24th century science. He had a special processor known as a ?positronic brain? that allowed him to mimic human behavior in an extremely accurate manner. As a result, not only could he process information at lightning speed and arrive at rational conclusions, he also seemed to have desires, interests, and inclinations. He could formulate relationships and make free choices.
In this episode, Commander Bruce Maddox, a member of the scientific research division of Starfleet, arrives on board the Enterprise with orders for Data to be transferred to him for the purpose of being disassembled with the goal of learning more about ?it? (Maddox refers to Data as ?it?, not ?him?, throughout the entire episode). His ultimate goal is to create an army of androids like Data which can serve the needs of Starfleet in space exploration. When Data learns that Maddox may not be able to reassemble him, he refuses to submit to the orders and is supported by Captain Picard, captain of the Enterprise and Data?s commanding officer. Picard argues that, as an officer on the Enterprise, Data has rights?among them the right to refuse to undergo an experimental procedure such as this. However, Picard is unsuccessful in getting the transfer orders rescinded and so Data resigns from Starfleet.
Maddox takes legal action with the local JAG (Judge Advocate General) officer challenging Data?s resignation and arguing that Data is not a person with a right to resign, but, being a machine, ?it? is the property of Starfleet. He argues ?Would you permit the computer of the Enterprise to refuse a refit?? going on to claim that Picard?s reaction is, ?emotional and irrational. You are endowing Data with human characteristics because it looks human, but it is not. If it were a box on wheels I would not be facing this opposition.?
The JAG officer concurs with Maddox and rules that Data is the property of Starfleet and cannot resign or refuse to co-operate. Picard requests a hearing to challenge the ruling and is placed in the position of being the defending attorney for Data while his senior officer, Commander Riker, is given the unenviable job of prosecuting attorney.
Riker opens his case by having Data define android which Data defines as ?an automaton made to resemble a human being.? Riker emphasizes ?automaton? and ?resembles.? After demonstrating Data?s abilities as a machine, Riker summarizes his argument:
The commander is a physical representation of a dream; an idea conceived of by the mind of a man. Its purpose: to serve human needs and interests. It?s a collection of neural nets and heuristic algorithms. It?s response dictated by elaborate software written by a man. It?s hardware built by a man. And now a man will shut it off.
With that Riker reaches behind Data and turns the switch that shuts him down say ?Pinocchio is broken. His strings have been cut.?
During a recess in the proceedings, Picard consults with Guinan, a wise alien on board the Enterprise and becomes convinced that the real issue in this case is the creation of a race of Data?s to be enslaved to do man?s bidding. He believes this issue has been obscured ?behind a comfortable, easy euphemism?property? and is determined to challenge that thinking.
In his opening defense Picard acknowledges that Data is a machine but comments that this is irrelevant, ?We too are machines, just machines of a different type.? He also acknowledges that, as Data was created by a human, so are we, ?Children are created from the building blocks of their parents DNA. Are they property?? He then asks Data a series of questions demonstrating that, like any person, he has wants and desires, values things, and forms deep personal relationships.
Picard then calls Maddox to the stand and asks for the definition of a sentient being. Maddox offers three criteria: ?Intelligence, self-awareness and consciousness.? Picard goes on to ask Maddox to ?prove to the court that I am sentient.? When Maddox claims that Picard?s sentience is obvious, Picard asks what the difference between himself and Data is. Maddox replies that Picard is self-aware (he acknowledges the first criteria of Data?s intelligence) and defines self-aware as ?Conscious of your existence and actions. You are aware of yourself and your own ego.?
Picard turns to Data and asks him what he is currently doing. Data replies, ?I am taking part in a legal hearing to determine my rights and status: am I a person or property.? When asked what is at stake, he replies, ?My right to choose. Perhaps my very life.? Picard points out how often Data refers to himself in his reply, ?My rights, my status, my right to choose, my life. He seems reasonably self-aware to me.? He then asks Maddox, ?What if Data can fulfill the last criteria, consciousness, in even the smallest degree? What is he then? Do you know?? He asks the same question of Riker and the JAG officer and goes on to say, ?Starfleet was founded to seek out new life, well there it sits.? Picard argues that if we create an army of Datas to do man?s bidding, then ?Thousands of Datas become a race. Won?t we be judged by how we treat that race??
After considering the arguments, the JAG officer makes her final ruling:
It sits there looking at me and I don?t know what it is. This case has dealt with metaphysics, with questions best left to saints and philosophers. I am neither competent nor qualified to answer those. But I?ve got to make a ruling to speak to the future. Is Data a machine? Yes. Is he the property of Starfleet? No. We have been dancing around the basic issue: Does Data have a soul? I don?t know that he has. I don?t know that I have. But I have got to give him the freedom to explore that question himself. It is the ruling of this court that Lt. Commander Data has the right to choose.
Data exercises his right to refuse to undergo the procedure encouraging Maddox to continue his research. Maddox agrees to rescind his request for transfer, commenting about Data that ?He?s remarkable.?
Excerpt From Essay:
I really do appreciate HelpMyEssay.com. I'm not a good writer and the service really gets me going in the right direction. The staff gets back to me quickly with any concerns that I might have and they are always on time.
I have had all positive experiences with HelpMyEssay.com. I will recommend your service to everyone I know. Thank you!
I am finished with school thanks to HelpMyEssay.com. They really did help me graduate college..