Virtual Team Norms and Procedures Case Study

Total Length: 1096 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 4

Page 1 of 4

Team Norms," author Karten (2003) discussed the importance of social norms in improving performance in teams within a business organization. Technically, Karten defined it as a concept "that concern(s) how team members will interact, communicate, and conduct themselves as members of the team" (par. 1). Moreover, team norms are reinforced primarily in groups with specific characteristics, such as those who are known to have high perceived social cohesion and performance within the team or group (Patterson, 2005:482). It is in these conditions that team norms are introduced, promoted, and instilled in team members.

The development and establishment of team norms are not just dependent on group characteristics, but also on the value system established within the team. This system puts value to specific beliefs determined within the team, and each member's perceived value for each belief would then determine the development of this belief to a shared belief or norm.

Value and belief systems within a team or group can be reinforced through social cohesion and explicit demonstration of the members' performance in the group. This would have been easily facilitated in teams within business organization who "physically" interact with each other. The case for virtual teams, despite their seemingly weak or lack of an organic / physical presence in the organization would be the same for non-virtual teams. However, it is especially critical for virtual teams to identify specific communication and task norms and clearly install and smoothly integrate them within virtual teams to make the establishment of these norms similar to the development of norms in "naturally-occurring" and constantly (physically) interacting teams. The texts that follow identify and recommend five communication and five task norms that are essential to the smooth performance of virtual teams.
Building trust and establishing shared beliefs in a virtual team can be challenging when the participants/members are not constantly interacting in a specific venue or "platform." However, virtual teams can optimize the functions of Internet technology to liken online or virtual interactions close to (if not similar) to face-to-face interactions. This is why according to Kirkman (2002), communication is a very essential component wherein norms must be established for virtual teams to truly mimic the natural formation of norms within the team. The five communication norms that will help virtual teams efficiently establish their norms within the group are: (1) listening; (2) responding; (3) following through / feedback; (4) recognition of performance; and (5) recognition of all perspectives.

Listening and responding are key communication norms that must be established clearly in a virtual team. Because online interactions tend to be dependent on audio-visual information received through the technology, there are nuances in face-to-face interactions that cannot be accounted for in online interactions, specifically non-verbal communication, such as facial expressions, gestures, concept of personal space and even haptics (communicating through touch). Moreover, in communication, listening has become a very essential skill that team members and communicators must have to ensure that issues are resolved. Issue resolution is a critical element contributing to the improvement of social cohesion within the team; social cohesion, meanwhile, bring about strengthen team belief in norms established in the organization.

Following through with specific member concerns or issues, recognizing different perspectives of team members, and recognizing the team members themselves are additional communication norms that must….....

Need Help Writing Your Essay?