Triple Bottom Line As an Research Paper

This would justify the introduction of complex, nuanced and creative correlations into any number of fields. For instance, this would change the discourse on organizational theory, a context in which reductionism governed industrial era thinking. The Systems Theory offered a counterpoint to the simplification of certain labor and resource approaches, helping to pave the way for the prospects of labor improvement and, increasingly, sustainability. Indeed, the Systems Theory is implicitly endorsed by such constructs as the Triple Bottom Line theory. This is a construct which is growing in influence and is somewhat deceptively couched in what seems to be a simplification of organizational principles. The Triple Bottom Line theory argues that organizational success can be achieved through a simple three-pillar model which concerns people, profits and planet. (Votaw, 1)

In spite of its rhetorical simplicity, this denotes an overlapping of rather complex ideas.Votaw (2008) reports that "the term 'triple bottom line' was first used in 1989 by sustainability consultant John Elkington to define business success, and has since become a common term, although not well understood. It measures performance in three ways: by social, economic and environmental factors." (Votaw, 1)

This explanation reveals a modern organizational theory that, like many, derives its progressive integration of myriad transdisciplinary factors from the premise of Systems Theory. Accordingly, Triple Bottom Line asks organizational decision-makers to approach personnel, environment and day-to-day operations with the understanding that all of these are inherently complex systems which demand nuanced, sensible and empathetic consideration.

Works Cited:

Heyighen, F. & Joslyn, C. (1992). What is Systems Theory. Principia Cybernetica Web.

Votaw, K.Q. (2008). The….....