Crisis Negotiations Ebert (1986) Believes "There Is Essay

Crisis Negotiations

Ebert (1986) believes "there is absolutely no justification for preventing mental health professionals from participating in virtually all facets of hostage negotiation," (p. 580). As Hatcher, Mohandie, Turner & Gelles (1998) point out, most mental health professionals that do participate in any aspect of hostage negotiation do so "by invitation only in police-established hostage negotiation schools," (p. 461). With this training, the mental health professional is thus theoretically prepared to engage the perpetrator directly. However, the mental health professional is only prepared when the training provided is thorough and consistent, and in accordance with the parameters and goals of each crisis situation.

The pros of employing a psychologist as a primary negotiator are clear. Most significantly, the psychologist has expertise in human behavior and cognition and can apply that knowledge to making quick decisions. The psychologist can also provide post-traumatic stress intervention services to the hostage victims and members of the police force who were likewise affected. Retaining a core psychologist or group psychologist as a primary negotiator can also alleviate the burden placed on officers in crisis situations, allowing police forces to perform the duties necessary within their domain of expertise. Expertise in the crisis situation itself as a moot point, as both psychologists and police officers require specialized training to serve as primary negotiators (Ebert, 1986).Furthermore, a psychologist helps to create a more diverse team on the police force and could lead to a more collaborative and multidisciplinary approach to crisis management. Ebert (1986) adds that having a psychologist serve as primary negotiator may have financial benefits for the department because "it is more economical to train a psychologist in hostage negotiation than to train a member of the police in psychology," (p. 581).

However, there are some cons in using psychologists as primary negotiators. For one, many psychologists might lack the prerequisite field experience necessary to conduct hostage negotiations successfully. The training courses offer simulations, but the psychologist's merit is not tested until a field situation arises. Second, there are fears that the perpetrator might learn that the primary negotiator is in fact a psychologist and not a cop. Hatcher et al. (1998) claim that the perpetrator might resent being labeled as being mentally ill and react irrationally, potentially escalating the problem. Another reason why psychologists might be better off in ancillary roles like consultant or integrated team member is that they may not….....