Supreme Court Case: According to Research Paper

While the decision has hung over states as one national standard, it infringes the essential principles of federalism and separation of powers that are rooted in the country's constitutional system (Silversten, 2011).

During the time that the Supreme Court made this ruling, the state of Georgia basically had the same position on punishment for the crime of rape with many states. Actually, very few states permitted the executions or enforcement of capital punishment for convicted rapists. Similar to many of the states, Georgia did not permit the execution of individuals convicted of rape mainly because of the constitutional requirement of proportionality. However, the Supreme Court made its ruling and conclusion through considering the objective indicia of the country's attitude toward capital punishment in rape cases. Nonetheless, this cannot be justified under the Constitution because the Supreme Court could have simply left the decision in place and restricted itself to analyzing the concerns and questions that were unexplored (Colb, 2003).

In making its ruling, the Supreme Court reversed the decision by Georgia's lower courts to give Coker the death penalty. As previously mentioned, the Supreme Court reversed the decision by Georgia's lower courts because it was considering the attitude of the nation toward death penalty in rape cases. While the reason for the Supreme Court's decision is justified, the ruling has attracted huge debates and concerns in favor and against the decision.

Based on the constitutional requirement of proportionally, I don't agree with the Supreme Court's decision since it's arbitrary.This decision results in the treatment of child rape as qualitatively more heinous than that of an adult woman for the purposes of capital punishment (Adam, 2008). One of the major concerns about the decision is that it specifically considers the rape of adult women but does not effectively address the rape of adults in general.

Conclusion:

In order to prevent subjective enforcement of the death penalty, there are certain constitutional requirements for an offender to receive this punishment. The major constitutional requirement that is used to determine cases involving the death penalty is proportionality.

References:

Adam, B. (2008, June 25). SCOTUS: Execution of Child Rapists Cruel, Unusual,

Unconstitutional. Retrieved July 29, 2012, from http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/06/25/541659/-SCOTUS-Execution-of-Child-Rapists-Cruel-Unusual-Unconst-l

Berman, D.A. & Bibas, S. (2008). Engaging Capital Emotions. Retrieved from Northwestern

University Law website: http://www.law.northwestern.edu/lawreview/colloquy/2008/17/

Colb, S.F. (2003, September 12). Is Capital Punishment Too Harsh for Rapists. Retrieved July

29, 2012, from http://edition.cnn.com/2003/LAW/09/12/findlaw.analysis.colb.rapists/index.html

"Death Penalty: An Overview." (2010, August 19). Legal Information Institute. Retrieved from Cornell University Law School website: http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/death_penalty

Silversten, M. (2011, January). Sentencing Coker v. Georgia to Death: Capital Child Rape

Statutes Provide the Supreme Court an Opportunity to Return Meaning to the Eighth Amendment. Gonzaga Law Review, 37(1), 121-166. Retrieved from http://blogs.gonzaga.edu/gulawreview/files/2011/01/Silversten.pdf

"Types of Sentences." (n.d.). Cliff Notes. Retrieved July 29, 2012, from http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/Types-of-Sentences.topicArticleId-10065,articleId-10040.html.....