Terrorism Intelligence, Counterterrorism and Protection, and Subjects Term Paper

Terrorism

Intelligence, counterterrorism and protection, and subjects for investigation appear to be relevant, interesting and worthy of detailed examination. The research traditions allowed in mainstream educational systems provide different avenues of approach to examine these ideas. The purpose of this paper is to examine the ideas of terrorism through the lenses of the five research conditions: narrative, grounded theory, phenomenology, case study and ethnography. Additionally, I will propose three different topics for doctoral research and determine why each of these approaches warrant inquiry.

Before examining terrorism, it is a most important challenge to define the term. The defining of this word is perhaps the greatest source of confusion included in this type of research inquiry. How is terrorism related to intelligence and protection? While these are fashionable catchwords of the day, it seems important to link the phrases and terms with concrete and realistic symbols that can be understood by the general populace. Terrorism is an emotional concept. Terror and fear are relative terms within the human psyche and determining specific and limiting methods of examination will no doubt obscure the greater picture of what is important to the purposes of higher education. It is therefore most important to choose an appropriate research method for the appropriate research question in order to paint a coherent and unfragmented picture or argument.

How do we rate the emotional causes and effects within the scientific realm of investigation? This challenge is most prevalent in dealing with ideas as abstract as "protection." Is there too much protection? Does protection not make some forms of terrorism legitimate and worthy of pursuit? It is my opinion that the educational institutions in the Western cultures have not assimilated nor have understood the global and widespread impact of its myopic definition of the word terrorism.

In my opinion, grounded theory has the least relevance in examining this particular idea of terrorism. Emotions and emotional reactions are not systematic in a measurable way. While it is true that humans can relate to each other emotionally, ideas such as happiness, sadness and terror are abstract and intangible when discussing them in an overtly scientific method. Emotions themselves are much more of a phenomenon that any type of measurable and repeatable system that the scientific method can provide illumination towards. Grounded theory itself, and its limiting nature, is not very useful in this instance due to its restrictiveness and inability to incorporate the intangibles. Case studies, with a more subtle approach to these intangibles, seem more appropriate than grounded theory, while phenomenology is most likely the best approach for investigating and assisting in gaining understanding towards this concept comprehensively.

TOPIC #1: DEFINE TERRORISM

Terrorism has no real definition that is useful for any objective analysis in present situations. There are many allusions to this term however. Violent force being….....