Kite Runner Lord Loyalty and Coming of Thesis

Kite Runner Lord

Loyalty and Coming of Age in the Kite Runner and Lord of the Flies

Coming of age is as difficult a challenge as one will ever face. The challenges of growing up and of taking on the responsibilities incumbent upon an adult are considerable. This is even more so when one grows up before a backdrop of violence, chaos or disorder. In such a context, honor, integrity and loyalty are either forged or bypassed. This is the reality at the center of both Khaled Hosseini's massively successful The Kite Runner (2003) and William Golding's groundbreaking Cold War parable, Lord of the Flies (1959). In both texts, young boys find themselves faced with matters of life and death; civility and violence; friendship and hatred. And in both texts, young boys are forced to make the kinds of decisions typically reserved for men. In particular, the struggles of Hosseini's Amir and of Golding's Ralph demonstrate the implications of loyalty as it relates to the difficult process of becoming a man.

For neither character is the demonstration of loyalty a simple task, but to be certain, one of the protagonists rises to the challenge while the other does not. In either event, they suffer for their decisions. In Ralph, the reader is given a model of leadership and loyalty in all of its nobility and self-doubt. When a group of boys is stranded on an island by an apparent plane crash, their ambitions for self-governance, survival and rescue quickly descend into a penchant for savagery. And the responsibility of maintaining some semblance of order falls largely upon the democratically elected Ralph. In his unenviable task, Ralph faces constant challenges to his authority and finds that the reciprocation of loyalty between he and a select few of the boys serves as the ever-diminishing line between order and utter savagery. We find that Ralph's power to retain civility depends on this loyalty. The symbol of the conch underscores this dynamic as in the scene where Ralph declares "we can't have everybody talking at once. We'll have to have "Hands up" like at school.' He held the conch before his face and glanced round the mouth." (Golding, p. 33)

Just as Ralph finds himself in a position of authority constantly under challenge, Amir's high birth status creates certain social dynamics that he must live up to. As with Ralph, he finds this particularly difficult to do in a context where adult issues invade children's games. Though Kabul is a somewhat idyllic place before the Russian invasion of 1979, it remains a context where ethnic status and bloodlines are highly determinant of one's fortunes. In Amir's friendship with the servant-class Hassan, the boy unwittingly transgresses these lines of ethnic demarcation and finds his loyalty tested by the disturbing behavior of Assef. Contrary to Ralph, who channels his courage in order to demonstrate loyalty to the boys for whom he has assumed leadership, Amir fails the test of courage. When Hassan bravely resists Assef's demand that he turn over Amir's kite, Assef beats and violates the loyal friend. Out of fear, Amir can only remain in the shadows to watch in horror. Amir remembers, " I opened my mouth, almost said something. Almost. The rest of my life might have turned out differently if I had. But I didn't. I just watched. Paralyzed." (Hosseini, p. 73)

This inaction would come to define Amir's life thereafter and would define his relationship with Hassan. From this point forward, he would be too humiliated to consort with his loyal friend. And this humiliating is only intensified by the knowledge of his friend's great boldness. On his behalf, Hassan had acted with the courage and the loyalty to protect his friend. In their first tense encounter, Hassan emerges victorious over Assef. As Hosseini observes, "someone had challenged their god. Humiliated him. And worst of all, that someone was a skinny Hazara. Assef looked from the rock to….....