Total Length: 1876 words ( 6 double-spaced pages)
Total Sources: 5
Page 1 of 6
Conclusion
The adoption of national legislation (NCLB), as well as many other education based and popular pressures to utilize the miracle of American ingenuity, i.e. technology in the classroom to help students better achieve learning goals very handily falls in the laps of school administrators. This group of individuals, with their already lengthy list of responsibilities has no choice, regardless of fears and inhibitions but to adequately support this goal by learning about what technologies are best, most economical and most importantly most supportive of student learning. The school administrator is the seat of most school reform as they are responsible for populating committees that search for and advocate technology use and make recommendations to school boards as well as in many cases the ones who ask for the funding to buy technology and also and almost more importantly help to implement technology in the real classrooms. For this reason the burden of proof rests on their shoulders and should not be taken lightly.
Resources
Gibson, a. & Weir, S. (2010) Technology and the Classroom [online]. Idiom, 46, 1, 39. Retrieved November 18, 2010 from: http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=313649786803301;res=IELHSS
Gold, M. & Lowe, C. (2009). The Integration of Assistive Technology into Standard Classroom Practices: A Guide for K-12 General Educators. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (pp. 3964-3968). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Bracey, G.W. (2006). The 16th Bracey report on the condition of public education: Phi Delta Kappan, 88(2), 151.
Hagel, C. (2006, March). Can America deal with the 21st century? 'USA Today (Society for the Advancement of Education), 134, 10.
Holden, Steve. (July 2007) Reform, Reform, Reform [online]. Teacher: The National Education Magazine, 21. Retrieved November 18, 2010 from: