Empiricism Is a Theory of Essay

As experiments became more complex, however, especially noting embryonic development, scientists found that the process that occurs in vitro parallels the evolutionary process of nerve system complexity, and then becomes more qualitative in that not every aspect of thought can be explained by a simple combination of neurotransmitters (neuron coded molecules) or electrical events. While it is true that the electrical even between two cells allows for communication, the subtle and complex nature of neural chemistry cannot completely define the process of memory and thought.

Thus, we see that not only was there an evolution in experimentation, but of the very definition of the neural system from a more purist rationalistic position, to one that combines the material with the immeasurable to form the next generation of conundrum.REFERENCES

Honderich, T., ed. (1995). Problems in the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.

Lacey, a.R. (1996). A Dictionary of Philosophy. 1st ed., Routledge.

Lynch, Robert. (2008). "Nerve Physiology." University of Colorado. Cited in:

www.colorado.edu/.../image/

Marike, Peter.(2004). "Rationalism vs. Empiricism." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Sweeney, M. (2009). Brain: The Complete Mind. National Geographic Books.

Van Doren, C. (1992). A History of Knowledge: Past, Present, and Future. Ballantine.

Watson, P. (2006). Ideas: A History of Thought an Invention. Harper.

Young, R.M. (2005). "The Mind-Body Problem." The Human Nature Review. Cited in:

http://human-nature.com/rmyoung/papers/pap102h.html.....