Incarnation and the Bible Essay

Strauss, Lehman. Why God Became Man. 2004. [Online]. Available http://bible.org/Article/-god -- man. For journal article, write a critique similar Book Analyses assignments.

"Why God Became Man" - analysis

"Why God Became Man" brings on an intriguing idea -- the concept that incarnation can be discussed in a context involving the Bible and Christian teachings in general. The article provides readers with the opportunity to interpret biblical texts from the writer's perspective and to gradually become better acquainted with the idea of incarnation being an important idea in Christianity. While it is intriguing to look at these ideas and at how the author links incarnation with a series of accounts from the bible, it would also be interesting to perceive this point-of-view objectively.

Although the article relates to the idea of incarnation as seen from a rational perspective from the very first lines of the text, the article goes on to address this respective idea in the context of Christ's birth without actually attempting to provide readers with a complex understanding of the concept. To a certain degree, it would be safe to say that the writer simply attempts to retell biblical events from a more modern perspective. If some would feel those particular texts to be outdated, "Why God Became Man" aims at providing these people with the opportunity to get a fresh understanding of their meaning (even with the fact that the article does not attempt to alter their initial message).The fact that the article discusses biblical ideas without actually attempting to bring on innovative concepts plays an important role in making the overall text more credible. The writer obviously did not want to introduce new ideas and focused on reinforcing the ones that humanity has been discussing for two millennia. This makes it possible for the text to effectively reach out to readers and to provide them with a set of rational concepts that they cannot possibly refute. It is not necessarily that the article is aimed at non-Christians, as the writer obviously wanted to address convinced Christians at this point and to enable them to enrich their knowledge while also discussing topics that they were already familiar with.

The writer acknowledges the degree to which incarnation will always be a sensible subject and does not attempt to bombard readers with pointless information that might confuse them. By restating the same idea over and over again….....