Smoking Ban and Cost of Essay

Total Length: 864 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 8

Page 1 of 3

" (Montini, Bero, 2008)

During their research, Montini and Bero spoke with many bar owners and discussed the problem of compliance with the law. They found that generally they all wanted to comply because compliance meant no fines and bars had very slim margin of profits which meant they did not want to owe any money to the agencies. But they complained of "level playing field" issue. For a restaurant owner, the same problem may arise. Since there is no level playing field, compliance can be hindered. Not all restaurants in the vicinity of this restaurant would want to comply with this law and those who don't are likely to cause fewer problems for their customers. This meant customers have an option available if smoking ban is too strict at one restaurant. However, if all restaurant owners sit together and decide in favor of compliance then customers will have no choice but to follow the law.

"In order to protect their individual business interests, bar owners had to work collectively in unanimously complying with or unanimously ignoring the law. The slim profit margins at stake increased the focus on, and the salience of, even and consistently maintained enforcement so that no bar was at a competitive disadvantage. No amount of local discretion was going to provide local enforcers with a bigger stick or a better carrot to foster the magnitude of change required.
" (Montini & Bero, 2008)

The business of this restaurant owner is affected not due to the no-smoking sign but due to customers disregard for the sign. For one, it costs the owner some money in fines, and secondly, it also causes problems for non-smoking customers. They may have chosen this restaurant because of its no-smoking policy but seeing other customers smoke can make the question owner's understanding of and regard for law.

What can be even more frustrating for owners is the lack of responsibility placed on customer for his behavior. If a customer chooses to ignore the sign, shouldn't he be held responsible and shouldn't he have to pay the fine as well. It seems that government seems to overlook this aspect of the compliance issue. The customers who choose to ignore the sign should be made to pay and this will facilitate compliance. The sign should be followed by a warning about fines for violators of law. Compliance should not be the sole responsibility of the owner.

References

Theresa Montini and Lisa A Bero. Implementation of a workplace smoking ban in bars: The limits of….....

Need Help Writing Your Essay?