Change Theory and Social Change Essay

Healthcare

Change Theory and Social Change

Domestic violence and abuse is a very severe difficulty, for both the victims and the abusers. There are a number of theories about what makes batterers use abuse on those who are close to them. One outlook is that batterers are toughened criminals who carry out their crimes in a cognizant, deliberate way to attain the supremacy they think men are entitled to. Others consider abuse to be the product of deep psychological and developmental scars, which are not gender particular. Some experts have reached an agreement on a number of universal characteristics amid batterers, they are scheming, calculating, frequently see themselves as victims and think that men have a predetermined right to be in charge of all facets of a relationship (Buddy, 2011).

Domestic Abuse takes place in associations where disagreement is the incessant consequence of authority inequity between the partners and one partner is afraid of, and injured by the other. The matters of authority and control are vital to an understanding of domestic violence (Buddy, 2011). Once domestic violence is understood then it can possibly be changed. Domestic violence is an intricate social difficulty. Addressing domestic violence raises significant challenges to the health care system itself. In order to truly stop domestic violence, rather than just treat its consequences, people must work together to change both the individual and social conditions that generate and support this kind of violence in the first place (Warshaw, 1996).

A change theory that can be applied to the issue of domestic violence is that of the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA).This theory suggests that the adoption, initiation, and maintenance of health behaviors must be openly envisioned as a process that is made up of at least a motivation segment and a volition segment. The latter might be further subdivided into a planning segment, action segment, and maintenance segment. It is maintained that perceived self-efficacy plays a critical role at all phases along with other cognitions (Schwarzer, 2011).

In the motivation segment, the person forms a meaning to either adopt a safety measure or change risk behaviors in favor of other behaviors. Self-efficacy and result expectancies are seen as the main predictors of purpose. Most preceding theories treat these two as being unconnected predictors. On the other hand, there might be a temporal and fundamental order among them. Result expectancies can be seen as originators of self-efficacy since people typically make suppositions about the possible penalties of behaviors prior to questioning whether they can really take the action themselves. If self-efficacy is particular as a mediator between result expectancies and purpose, the direct power of result expectation on intention may disperse. But the research findings on this matter are very contradictory, rendering both cognitions main candidates for inspiring alteration. Under circumstances where people have no experience with the performance they are considering, it is assume that result expectancies may have a stronger undeviating influence than self-efficacy. Only after an adequate level of experience is achieved does….....