Strict Scrutiny Test for This Term Paper

Total Length: 845 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 3

The petit theft of the second degree charge will stand as well. Larceny in old common law was classified as compound or simple. Simple larceny was called grand larceny when the value of the stolen property was more than 12 pence, and petit (petty) larceny when the value was less. Compound larceny was the taking and carrying away of property from the person or house of the owner. In the U.S. today, the various criminal codes of the states generally define larceny and classify it as either grand larceny or petit larceny. Under these codes, property is stolen and larceny committed when, with definite intent to deprive oneself or a third person, one wrongfully takes, obtains, or withholds such property from an owner of it. In New York State, for example, grand larceny is classified as a felony. It is characterized as first-degree if the property is obtained by extortion or through the abuse of a position as a public servant, and as second- or third-degree larceny depending on the value of the property stolen and the nature of the theft. Petit larceny, a misdemeanor, refers to theft not covered in the first three degrees. So, indeed, petit theft equates to petit larceny.There was no "bad act" in the Pink *****cats case, so there is no crime there at all. Battery is an general intent crime and Sandy will be charged with that since she escalated the conflict even if she felt startled. Jammie can be sued for battery as an intentional tort as well. The Sam and Harry case is a classic one of felony murder. A co-conspirator and co-actor was killed in the commission of a felony, so the charge will stand.

By the mailbox rule, the first sale of the car stands - the acceptance was sent before a revocation received, so therefore the defendant will be bound by the first contract to sell the car. As far as the mob connection, there was an accord and satisfaction, so Herbert was in the right. However, the underlying illegality may erase all of those considerations.

Gerwin will win because the firm was already under a legal obligation to hire John. There is no merit to the ties suit as the store has a right to charge whatever it likes for its products.

If it was found by a jury that both parties understood the nature of the contract despite their individual….....

Need Help Writing Your Essay?