Total Length: 1806 words ( 6 double-spaced pages)
Total Sources: -24
Page 1 of 6
Unfortunately, at least according to the literature researched here, these are neither sufficiently addressed nor remedied, in most cases, by affirmative action alone at the post-secondary level.
Works Cited
Bowen, William G., and Bok, Derrick. The Shape of the River: Long-term
Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions.
Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1998.
Comer, J. And Poussaint, Alvin. Black Child Care. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1975.
Constitution of the United States. Microsoft Encyclopedia Encarta, 1-32.
Retrieved August 8, 2005, from Microsoft Works Suite 2000 (CD-ROM), Disc
Dred Scott Case. Microsoft Encyclopedia Encarta, 1-3. Retrieved August
8, 2005 from Microsoft Works Suite 2000 (CD-ROM), Disc 3.
Eaton, James. Strengthening Collegiate Education in Community Colleges. San Jose, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1994.
Kozol, Jonathan. Savage Inequalities. New York: Crown, 1993. 4. McCormick, R.L. "Advancing Diversity in a Post-Affirmative Action State:
Implications for the Future." Paper presented to the Association of American
Colleges and Universities, 20 January 2000. Retrieved August 10, 2005, from: http://www.washington.edu...1_Affirmative_Action_State- speechpage.htm>.
Moos, Patrick. "Ward Connerly Speaks on Affirmative Action, Diversity in Higher Education. Brown Daily Herald. Retrieved August 10, 2005, at http://www.browndailyherald.com/stories.cfm?ID=2208.htm.
Parnell, D. Why Do I Have to Learn This? Texas: Center for Occupational
Research and Development, Inc., 1995.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 1978. (1991). Civnet.
Retrieved August 8, 2005 from: http://www.civnet.org/resources/teach / basic/part6/41.htm.
Thernstrom, S., and Thernstrom, A. America in Black and White. New York:
Simon & Schuster, 1997.
U.S. Supreme Court Rules on University of Michigan Cases. (June 23, 2003).
News Service. University of Michigan. Retrieved August 9, 2005, at http://www.umich.edu/news/Releases/2003/Jun03/supremecourt.html.
Why….....