Virtualization And Biometrics As Etzioni Article Review

Some Key applications are:Physical Acces facility and secure-area access, time-and-attendance monitoring. Growth: Flat, starting at 13% of total market revenues and ending at 14%. Logical Access: PC, networks, mobile devices, kiosks, accounts. Growth: From 21% to 31% of total market revenues. Identity Services: Background check enrollment, credentialing, document issuance. Growth: Decline from 65% to 47% of total market revenues. Surveillance and Monitoring: Time and attendance, watchlists. Growth: From less than 1% to nearly 8% of total market revenue. Virtualisation is the key technology to transform what's happening in the data centre and link it to external service providers using common technology, common formats, common shipping containers. Add information and security to the picture and we have an interesting view of the future of it, where we combine the attributes of what we like about data centres and what we like about clouds for fully virtualised assets in the data centre and compatible infrastructure that we can flex in and out of. A key aspect of this vision is to address what happens in the enterprise, on the device and the user experience, as well as with service providers. Three key technology areas that require addressing are the cloud operating system, what we need to do with networks and computing, and how does information infrastructure evolve and flex in this fully virtualised environment.The optimization of resource allocations through the use of virtualization has limits. Middleware may impose its own resource limits that cannot be overridden by the hypervisor. For instance, application servers may become constricted by such things as Java** Virtual Machine (JVM**) heap size restrictions or the number of allowed socket connections in a connection pool.19 in such cases, additional virtual cluster nodes may be needed to overcome the constraint.

The optimization of resource allocations through the use of virtualization has limits. Middleware may impose its own resource limits that cannot be overridden by the hypervisor. For instance, application servers may become constricted by such things as Java** Virtual Machine (JVM**) heap size restrictions or the number of allowed socket connections in a connection pool.19 in such cases, additional virtual cluster...

...

For instance, an OS such as Linux may automatically fill up any unused memory available to it with an I/O cache. Such a technique is reasonable in a standalone server environment, but in a virtual one it can needlessly consume resources that could better be used by other virtual cluster nodes. Hence, "right-sizing" virtual machine memory capacity becomes an important configuration consideration.
Likewise, availability management (and other system management) tools often depend on management agents running on each node to gather and report status back to a management server. These agents will typically consume some portion of a CPU even when the system they are monitoring is idle. On standalone systems, this is negligible. But even if one agent on each of 100 virtual machines is using only 1% of a physical processor, cumulatively the agents consume a full processor at idle. One solution is the use of management tools that operate at the hypervisor level rather than the individual guest level. Examples include IBM Operations Manager for z/VM and VMware VirtualCenter. A second possible solution is to use a tool whose agents operate with extremely low overhead (or only run if a particular resource has been consumed), such that even their accumulated processor usage will be tolerable. Alternatively, agents can be selectively deployed to only those virtual machines deemed the most critical.

An emerging virtualization optimization is to enable certain segments of memory to be directly shared between guests. This can be leveraged, for instance, to allow read-only Linux shared library files to be shared by all Linux guests, greatly reducing total real memory consumption.20 the impact, if any, of such memory sharing on guest availability in the face of various failure types is a topic for future work.

Reference

Etzioni, a. "Identification cards in America. " Society 36.5 (1999): 70-76. Social Science Module, ProQuest. Web. 4 Jun. 2010.

Bhargav-Spantsel et al. Privacy preserving multi-factor authentication with biometrics. Journal of Computer Security (15) (2007): 529-560. IOS…

Sources Used in Documents:

Reference

Etzioni, a. "Identification cards in America. " Society 36.5 (1999): 70-76. Social Science Module, ProQuest. Web. 4 Jun. 2010.

Bhargav-Spantsel et al. Privacy preserving multi-factor authentication with biometrics. Journal of Computer Security (15) (2007): 529-560. IOS Press.


Cite this Document:

"Virtualization And Biometrics As Etzioni" (2010, June 04) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/virtualization-and-biometrics-as-etzioni-10962

"Virtualization And Biometrics As Etzioni" 04 June 2010. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/virtualization-and-biometrics-as-etzioni-10962>

"Virtualization And Biometrics As Etzioni", 04 June 2010, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/virtualization-and-biometrics-as-etzioni-10962

Related Documents

The truth of the matter is the biometric templates for identity enrolment that are stored on a server are not in the real since images rather they are mathematical representations of the data points that the biometric algorithm is able to extract from the scanned fingerprint, finger vein, palm vein or iris. The identifying template is a binary file that has a series of zeros and ones. The algorithm then

Biometric Safeguards and Risks Biometric Safeguarding Itakura and Tsujii are proposing to allow an external organization, such as PKI, to issue biological certification as a way to ensure the validity of biological information. (Itkura, 2005) It would consist of three cryptographic keys; a public key and two secret keys. The public key would be defined as the representative template for personal biological information registration. The algorithm selects the representative template to be

It also helps to reduce the threat of identity theft as this is frequently initiated through the hacking of such highly vulnerable wireless communication devices. According to ThirdFactor, the same BioLock technology is currently being adapted to meet the needs of the Microsoft Windows and Mac OS packages on the market's near horizon. This suggests that the pacesetting consumer brands in the technology, software, cell phone and computing industries

Biometric Controls Biometric Cost Analysis There are some questions that will help determine the cost benefit analysis of a new biometric system (Cooper). The level of security, the level of reliability, need of backup, the acceptable time for enrollment, level of privacy, and storage needed are things that need to be determined first. Will the system be attended or not? Does the system need to be resistant to spoofing? Will the system

Biometric for Security
PAGES 5 WORDS 1493

This was done by creating an artificial fingerprint from the little traces that are left on the biometric scanners. This entailed the process of obtaining the relevant biometric data. The second approach involved employment of a technique that is commonly referred to as deploying a replay attack. In this approach is equivalent to the man-in-the-middle attack that is common in various communication data breaches. The process involves the tapping

However, a very determined criminal, as mentioned above, might go as far as cutting off fingers in order to circumvent this problem. Nonetheless, fingerprinting appears to make car theft somewhat more challenging than the ordinary immobilizing device. Main Conclusions Because of its groundbreaking technology and the fact that it makes car theft more difficult than ordinary immobilizing devices, biometric fingerprinting devices for immobilizing and car door locking holds particular advantages over