Transfer Pricing Case Study

Management Accounting Coffee Makers Incorporated Transfer Prices Case Study

The Current Position

Department B

Proposed Changes

Department B

Coffee Makers Incorporated has two divisions which purchase parts internally form a third department. Two parts; 101 and 201 are produced internally. The current transfer price for those parts is $1,000 and $2,000 respectively. The departments which are buying the parts; dept. A is buying part 101 and dep. B is buying part 201, want to change the purchase pattern, as external suppliers can supply the parts at a price less than the transfer price (dept. C) is charging.

Currently Dept A buys 3000 of the 101 parts from department C. topped up with 1,000 parts from external suppliers, department B. purchases 1,000 parts from dept. C and 1,000 parts from external suppliers. Both departments want to make a change to reduce their own costs, moving more purchases to the external supplier. It is likely that they are assuming the lower cost to the department will benefit the firm. However, the transfer price is not a price at cost; it is a price in which there is a surplus of revenues after the variable costs have been deducted. To assess if the plan to purchase more parts from external suppliers would be beneficial to the firm it is necessary to look a both the savings that will be made by the purchasing departments and the level of contribution that would be lost by department C (Atkinson et al., 2011)

The Current Position

The first stage of the calculation is to assess the current position. The contribution level of the internal parts needs to be determined; this is calculated by taking the internal transfer price and deducted all of the variable costs; this is shown in table 1.

Table 1; Contribution level for Parts 101 and 201

Transfer price

1,000

2,000

Direct material

Direct labor

Variable overhead

Total variable costs

Contribution per unit

Department A

The next stage is to calculate the costs of the departments purchasing the goods. Department A purchases 3,000 units at $1,000 from dept C, and 1,000 units from external suppliers at $900, these costs are sown in table 2

Table 2; Purchase costs to dept A

Purchase source

Units purchased

Cost per unit

Total costs

Dept C

3,000

1,000

3,000,000

External supplier

1,000

900,000

Total

4,000

3,900,000

The price includes the contribution which is created, so this needs to be assessed, and is shown in table...

...

A
No of units purchased

Contribution per unit generated

Total contribution

3,000

900,000

The net cost to the firm is the cost paid out by dept A., less the contributions received by dept C, shown in table 4.

Table 4; Current net cost to the firm for dept. A

Costs for department A

3,900,000

Less contribution from dept c

900,000

Net cost to firm

3,000,000

Department B

The same process may be used to calculate the current net cost. Table 5 shows the costs that are incurred by dept. B under the current purchase arrangements

Table 5; Current costs to dept. B

Purchase source

Units purchased

Cost per unit

Total costs

Dept C

1,000

2,000

2,000,000

External supplier

1,000

1,900

1,900,000

Total

2,000

3,900,000

The next stage is to assess the contribution that is created for dept C. As a result of the transaction. This is shown in table 6.

Table 6; Current contribution generated on sales to dept. B

No of units purchased

Contribution per unit generated

Total contribution

1,000

800,000

With the impact on both departments calculated, they can be brought together in order to assess the net cost of the purchases to the firm, this is shown in table 7.

Table 7; Current net cost to the firm for dept. B

Costs for department A

3,900,000

Less contribution from dept. C

800,000

Net cost to firm

3,100,000

Proposed Changes

With the current net costs to the firm assessed, the next stage is to assess the costs that would be incurred if the changes were implemented. This can then be used to compare to the current costs. Each department will be considered in turn.

Department A

Dept. A wants to changes the purchases, so 200 units are purchased internally and 200 externally, table 8 shows the new costs for dept. A.

Table 8; New costs for dept. A

Purchase source

Units purchased

Cost per unit

Total costs

Dept C

2,000

1,000

2,000,000

External supplier

2,000

1,800,000

Total

4,000

3,800,000

The costs will decrease for dept. A, under this plan. However,…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Atkinson, AA; Kalan, RS; Matsumura, EM; Young, SM, (2011), Management Accounting: Information for Decision-Making and Strategy Execution, Prentice Hall

Libby R; Libby P; Short, D, (2010), Financial Accounting, McGraw-Hill


Cite this Document:

"Transfer Pricing" (2014, January 20) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/transfer-pricing-181121

"Transfer Pricing" 20 January 2014. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/transfer-pricing-181121>

"Transfer Pricing", 20 January 2014, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/transfer-pricing-181121

Related Documents

Transfer Pricing Disputes Current Profit Inc./Dec Costs Costs Division A Internal @ $1,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,800,000 Total Costs 3,900,000 3,800,000 Division B Internal @ $2,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 External @ $1,900 1,900,000 2,850,000 Total Costs 3,900,000 3,850,000 Inc 50,000 Division C Part 101 @ $1,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 Part 201 @ $2,000 2,000,000 Total Sales 2,100,000 1,400,000 Part 201 @ $1,200 1,200,000 Total Costs 3,300,000 2,000,000 Profit 1,700,000 Company as a whole (100,000 + 50,000) -- 700,000 = 550,000 loss To enforce the proposed plan would cause a $550,000 loss for the company as a whole. The increases in profits for division A and B, $100,000 and $50,000 respectively, are not enough to

Next, the project management teams implementing the transfer pricing system need to benchmark existing processes, systems and pricing methodologies to evaluate their relative strengths and weaknesses (Sijmonsbergen, Carey, Schmid, 2007). Documentation of the processes and the planned improvements, including the methodologies for defining market-based pricing are completed. These are often process flow diagrams that provide insight into the extent of the change planned to ensure the organization can accomplish

Table 2, Relationships in MNSC problem provide an analysis of these factors in the form of a decision matrix of transfer prices, transport cost allocations and trade quantities from an import and expert standpoint (Villegas, Ouenniche, 2008). This is one of the more useful aspects of this article, in that it extrapolates the near-term decisions of transfer pricing systems directly and materially into the financial reporting of the firm in

Cmi and Transfer Pricing
PAGES 4 WORDS 1546

Accounting Transfer Pricing Case Study; Coffee Makers Incorporated The decision to make or purchase a good that can, or already is supplied internally requires careful consideration. Different departments may look at the issue differently, especially if the internal transfer pricing does not reflect the market conditions. However, although different departments may have different budgets, the firm will also need to take a broader view and consider the bottom line for the firm. In

For instance, a parent company that has a low level of ownership in a subsidiary may want to lower the price paid to that subsidiary to increase parent company profits. Or, if the subsidiary has a lower dividend payout, the parent may wish to pay a high price to that subsidiary to avoid larger dividend payouts at home. Further, high import tariffs at the parent's country may lead to

Transfer Price Evaluation Under the proposed plan, Division A would have a cost reduction of $100,000, Division B. would have a cost reduction of $50,000, Division C. would have a profit reduction of $700,000, and the company would have an increase in profits of $80,000. If Division C. would drop their prices to meet market prices and the other divisions agree to them doing all the production, they would still loose