Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Free Trade Agreements
Are free trade agreements a good policy for nations? Given that there are 200 free trade agreements in place globally, there are clearly benefits, but what are the negatives? This paper explores the positives and negatives of free trade agreements, and this paper delves into the NAFTA pact between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, for the upsides and downsides of that agreement.
What are Free Trade Agreements and why does the U.S. engage in FTAs?
International Trade Administration (ITA) explains on its website that Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) have proved to be "…one of the best ways to open up foreign markets to U.S. exporters" (www.trade.gov). Trade agreements "…reduce barriers" to United States exports, they "protect U.S. interests," and they "enhance the rule of law" with the country that is partnering with the U.S. (www.trade.gov).
American companies can export their products less expensively when trade barriers are removed because this relationship with other countries creates a "…more stable and transparent trading and investment environment" (www.trade.gov). In fact forty-one percent of the American goods that are exported...
are growing at a "…faster rate than exports to the rest of the world," the ITA explains.
The main economic FTA the U.S. is involved with is NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, which went into effect in 2004. That said, the U.S. has three FTAs that are pending approval by Congress; those are a free trade deal with Colombia, with Panama, and with South Korea (Cooper, 2011). As to the potential FTA with Korea, Hyun Chong Kim writes in the peer-reviewed SERI Quarterly that the biggest beneficiaries for Korea will be "…consumers whose purchasing power will increase as a result of increased selection, increased competition, and inexpensive commodities that become available in the market" (Kim, 2011, p. 16). For example Kim points out that as of 2011, a kilogram of beer in Korea in 2005 was $43.70; that is the most expensive in the world, and presumably a FTA with the U.S. could lower that price considerably (Kim, 15).
NAFTA Advantages: There are several perspectives as regards the success of NAFTA. According to the…
Works Cited
Cooper, William H. (2011). Free Trade Agreements: Impact on U.S. Trade and Implications
for U.S. Trade Policy. Collingdale, PA: DIANE Publishing.
Gallagher, Kevin, and Wise, Timothy. (2009). Nafta's unhappy anniversary. The Guardian.
Retrieved August 9, 2012, from http://www.guardian.co.uk.
from http://trade.gov/fta/
Retrieved August 8, 2012, from http://www.ustr.gov.
The level of industrialization of the SEA countries also varies largely but this can be attributed to the difference in the size of the domestic market of each country or region and their overall level of development on the economic front. Singapore and Indonesia have benefitted largely from the creation of the ASEAN since these countries are the larger of the SEA countries. Malaysia has also benefitted as a
Trade Between China and the United States This paper discusses some theories about international trade, and why countries trade with one another. The first trade theory that warrants discussion is specialization, something that Adam Smith touched on. He used the analogy of specific professional to illustrate this theory -- nations do what they are best at. A quick look at the relationship between the U.S. And China illustrates this quite well.
Trade Liberalization In basic terms, trade liberalization has got to do with bringing down the various trade limitations existing between countries. It is important to note that in an attempt to protect their domestic industries, many countries from across the world have in the past erected numerous protectionist measures including but not limited to tariffs and quotas. This has amongst other things had the effect of stifling international trade. This text
The (international debt) crisis offers various faces to the observer according to the nature of the issues involved -- be they purely financial, political, economic and social, or structural -- and according to the role of the actors involved in these issues -- be they debtor countries, multilateral development agencies, creditor governments, or commercial banks." (Kaufman, "Banking And Currency Crises And Systemic Risk: Lessons From Recent Events") World Banks Trade requires
On the other side of the barricade stand the European Union and Japan. Canada and Bolivia are part of several free trade agreements: Bolivia is part of the Andean Community Free Trade Area, while Canada is part of NAFTA. The effects of free trade in agriculture in countries like Canada, China, and Bolivia can be quite diverse. Canada is a developed, industrialized country that can better handle the negative aspects implied
Free Trade Trade is the exchange of goods or services, and international trade is the same when it crosses international borders. Trade across borders traditionally has been subject to trade barriers such as quotas, taxes, tariffs and duties. Modern trade theory rests on two key platforms. The first is Ricardian trade theory, based on comparative advantage, where both parties in a trading arrangement can enjoy a higher net level of trade