Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Capital Structure Decision and Cost of Capital
My SLP Company of choice is Wal-Mart Stores. The other two companies I will be relying on for purposes of this discussion are Target Corp. And Costco Wholesale Corporation. Both companies happen to be in the same industry as Wal-Mart Stores. Most specifically, this text will compute the debt ratio and the debt-to-equity ratio of Wal-Mart Stores and discuss whether or not these ratios could be regarded too large or too small. Further, comparisons will be made between the debt-to-equity ratio of Wal-Mart Stores and that of its two competitors - Target and Costco. 44) define the same as "a measure of the firm's financial leverage…." It is computed by dividing the total debt or liabilities figure with the representative total equity figure. All the dollar figures below are in thousands.
The debt ratio in the words of Graham and Smart (2011, p. 44) is "a measure of the proportion of total assets financed by a firm's creditors." It is computed by dividing the total debt figure with the summation of equity and total liabilities. All the dollar figures below are in thousands.
Wal-Mart's debt ratio;
= total liabilities / (total liabilities + equity)
= $126,243,000 / ($126,243,000 + $76,862,000) = 0.62
Debt ratio for short-term liabilities;
= short-term liabilities / (short-term liabilities + equity)
= $71,818,000 / ($71,818,000 + $76,862,000) = 0.48
Debt ratio for long-term liabilities;
= long-term liabilities / (long-term liabilities + equity)
= $54,425,000 / ($54,425,000 + $76,862,000) = 0.41
Wal-Mart's debt-to-equity ratio;
= total liabilities / total equity
= $126,243,000 / $76,343,000 = 1.65
Debt-to-equity ratio for short-term liabilities;
= short-term liabilities / total equity
= $71,818,000 / $76,343,000 = 0.94
Debt-to-equity ratio for long-term liabilities;
= long-term liabilities / total equity
= $54,425,000 / $76,343,000 = 0.71
The debt ratio of Wal-Mart as per the computations above is neither too high not too low. This is particularly the case given the industry Wal-Mart operates in. Retail and utility industries according to Quiry et al. (2011) have highly predictable and relatively stable cash flows. Thus in addition to being stable, cash flows in this case are not volatile. In that regard, Wal-Mart's debt ratio of 62% is largely manageable. It is also important to note that given that the debt ratio is in this case below 1, the amount of assets Wal-Mart has significantly exceed the debt value.
As per the computations above, Wal-Mart's debt-to-equity ratio is particularly high.…
References
Borowski, A. (2010). Financial Management: The Role and Importance of Capital Markets and EMH. Norderstedt Germany: GRIN Verlag.
Graham, J. & Smart, S.B. (2011). Introduction to Corporate Finance (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Porter, G.A. & Norton, C.L. (2010). Financial Accounting: The Impact on Decision Makers (7th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Quiry, P., Fur, Y.L., Salvi, A., Dallochio, M. & Vernimmen, P. (2011). Corporate Finance: Theory and Practice (3rd ed.). Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Capital Structure Decision and Cost of Capital In basic terms, capital structure has got to do with how companies finance their overall operations using various sources of funds. In this text, I recommend what is in my opinion the optimal capital structure for the three companies selected for purposes of this discussion. The companies that will be used for purposes of this discussion are: Alaska Air Group, the Clorox Group, and
Business -- Corporate Finance -- Capital Structure Decisions and the Cost of Capital Based on the readings of the module and upon reviewing total debt/equity ratios, company betas, profitability ratios, company revenue, assets, and liabilities, and the nature of the operations of the companies, including the nature of their customers and products, what would you recommend to be the capital structure (total liabilities or debt and equity proportions) for each of
Statement 3 Another important issue to consider in the contraction of debt is represented by the impact of this debt on the company stakeholders -- employees, business partners, the public, and most importantly, the share holders. The primary scope of the economic agent is that of creating value for its stakeholders, but excessive debt could jeopardize this desire, especially since debt is money that has to be repaid and it as
Capital Structure Modigliani and Miller argued that capital structure is irrelevant, all other things being equal, but in the real world those other things are never equal. The factors that are ruled out of MM are neutral taxes, no capital market frictions, symmetric access to credit markets, and that firm finance policy reveals no information. Normally, arguments against the irrelevance of capital structure are based on these factors that MM assumed
All theories of capital structure are considered supplementary. As Myers pointed out it is a 'kind of puzzle and every new theory fills a small gap'. (Does Capital Structure really matter?) Evaluating the tradeoff and pecking order theory Shyam-Sunder and Myers by analyzing the debt patterns through time they could find out that under the pecking order model, "a regression of debt financing on the firms deficit of funds should
Capital Budgeting Sunk costs are costs that have already been incurred. So for example if a company spent money on a marketing assessment for a new product, that would not be included in the decision to bring that product to market because that money was already spent. Sunk costs are not included in a capital budgeting analysis. Opportunity costs are not included in a capital budgeting analysis. An opportunity cost is something