Socrates And Callicles We May Research Proposal

PAGES
2
WORDS
833
Cite

Then, my good friend, take my advice, and refute no more." In short, you must learn to take care of yourself and deal with current circumstances -- refusing to participate in 'the system' will only cause you harm, and by extension, harm to those you care about. If politicians did not learn to deal with the real world on a practical level, nothing would get accomplished, including social justice. That is why people think little of individuals who do not work at anything practical, and merely philosophize -- often living off of the good will of others. Callicles positions himself as a great orator, but Socrates states that the humbleness of philosophy and its necessity is what makes it great -- in other words, Callicles' advocacy of the political life does not involve real, material work, but only empty hot air. Knowing how to philosophize is as necessary as knowing how to swim: "Surely swimming saves a man from death, there are occasions on which he must know how to swim. And if you despise the swimmers, I will tell you of another and greater art, the art of the pilot,...

...

Yet his art is modest and unpresuming: it has no airs or pretences of doing anything extraordinary." Socrates says that the governing body of Athens is engaged in flattery when they profess to admire Callicles, and that they do nothing real and substantial, unlike a pilot.
If every good person were to follow Socrates' advice, no one who was good would become involved in politics, at least not in an effective manner. To be an able politician is to be an able educator. It is both knowing what is right, and communicating what is right: that is why Abraham Lincoln is considered America's greatest politician. He often made great compromises with the opposition when necessary, as well as stood by his core principles and used eloquence to defend his ideals. Knowing how to swim, philosophically, may indeed by vitally important, but people must understand why they need to swim, and be persuaded to do so, and that requires the tools of rhetoric. To change Callicles' 'dog-eat-dog' world where 'might makes right' ironically requires using the types of political and rhetorical skills Callicles advocates that his audience learn.

Cite this Document:

"Socrates And Callicles We May" (2009, June 23) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/socrates-and-callicles-we-may-21002

"Socrates And Callicles We May" 23 June 2009. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/socrates-and-callicles-we-may-21002>

"Socrates And Callicles We May", 23 June 2009, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/socrates-and-callicles-we-may-21002

Related Documents
Plato Gorgias
PAGES 2 WORDS 753

Plato Gorgias Based on your interpretation of "The Gorgias," what is the relationship between philosophy and politics, in a democracy? How does the debate between Callicles and Socrates inform your answer to this question? In the dialogue entitled "Gorgias," the title character, a teacher of rhetoric, does rhetorical battle with the philosopher Socrates. Several individuals enter the dialogue, most notably Callicles, whom over the course of this dialogue emerges as a rather

Nietzsche and Nihilism "Nihilism" was the term used by Friederich Nietzsche to describe what he considered the devaluation of the highest values posited by the ascetic ideal. The age in which he lived was viewed by the German philosopher as one of passive nihilism, which he defined as the unawareness of the fact that the religious and philosophical absolutes had dissolved in the emergence of the 19th century Positivism. Since traditional

Political Theory
PAGES 7 WORDS 2505

Gorgias, Plato addresses the Sophists and shows Socrates facing off against several of them in a discussion of justice. As can be seen from this dialogue, different Sophists taught somewhat different doctrines. In general, though, the Sophists considered the nature of law and whether law could be viewed as something objective, a scientific certainty to be applied to the world. Essentially, the Sophists found that there was no way

Plato, Thomas Aquinas and Jeremy Bentham have exerted great influence over our ideas of justice and have spawned various schools of thought. This paper compares views on justice by looking at their writings on the ideal state and what constitutes moral behavior. Plato (427-327 BC) is one of the most famous philosophers of antiquity. In The Republic, Plato wrote of his concept of individual justice as an offshoot of what he